George Soros Hacked Our Election - Not Russia

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      You know it, you feel it. Something is not quite right with the Russia hack our election story and as each day goes by, more and more people are realizing this in a big way. This is a story that has many ins and outs. It is complex as to hide the truth. We will focus on two areas of deceit - the hacking of our election and the discrediting of the President of the United States.

      The plan was set, the fix was in as the Soros controlled Spanish online voting company SKYTL bought the largest vote processing corporation in the United States, SOE. As the largest election results reporting company in the US, SOE provides reports right down to the precinct level. But before going anywhere else, those election returns are routed to individual, company servers where the people who run them “…get ‘first look’ at results and the ability to immediately and privately examine (and  change?) vote details throughout the USA.” In short, “this redirects results …to a centralized privately held server which is not just USA-based, but global.” It had acquired the means of manufacturing the outcome of the 2016 election.

   

      In 2016 we witnessed millions begin to realize how elections are rigged and that we truly have no choice.The votes were there for the taking and the George Soros funded candidate Hillary Clinton was to be the next President and continue the push towards Corporate Socialism in the United States that was accelerated by the last administration, but they overlooked one thing - the electoral college. While the Progressive candidate won the popular vote, she lost the election. Soros was furious. He set out to destroy the reputation and the legitimacy of the President elect by using his continuing campaign to push the western powers towards war with Russia. (Soros is a criminal in Russia and has an arrest warrant out for him. He faces the death penalty if convicted.) 

      The narrative is that the Russians, in order to defeat the anti-Russian candidate Hillary Clinton, hacked the U.S. elections and interfered with the results if not directly then indirectly. Through the use of his media holdings, leaks, and outright falsehoods Soros organizations turned the facts upside down and that narrative which succeeded to all but immobilized the U.S. government from any meaningful accomplishments which was his goal all along.

The problem is - it never happened!!

      The proof is everywhere. Leaders of both parties have stated that no votes were changed or the final outcome of the election comprimised. No, but it does have George Soros fingerprints all over the hack. The Russians aren't stupid or careless so why was the...

• Hacking was done with obsolete Russian software as to leave a "fingerprint."
• Hacking was traced to a company in Ukraine.
• Hack was obvious, not hidden.
• Hack did nothing to change votes. (Why not if that was the intent?)

      Hacking U.S. voting machines is easier than the government would lead you to believe. "The exposure of those devices to the people who do bug bounties or actually look at these kind of devices has been fairly limited," said Brian Knopf, an internet of things security researcher for Neustar, a security analysis company. "A  great opportunity for those of us who hack hardware and firmware to look to these kind of devices and really answer that question, 'Are they hackable?'" After just about an hour and a half, the answer was an emphatic "yes."

      "It's really just a matter of plugging your USB drive in for five seconds and the thing's completely compromised at that point," security checking Synack co-founder Jay Kaplan said. "To the point where you can get remote access. It's very simple. When you're in the machine, changing votes is as simple as updating an Office document." The question arises, why didn't they do it?

      Collusion? We don't even have to state the fact that numerous Democrats on panels investigating the "Trump/Russia connection" have come out to state publicly that "there is no proof of collusion," but that's not the whole truth. The mainstream media is covering up one of the largest scandals to rock this country - that Democrats WERE involved.

      The New York Post has an explosive report on the infamous “dossier” that tried to smear Donald Trump in order to swing the presidential election to Hillary Clinton. The New York Times says the Fusion GPS’ effort was funded by “Democratic supporters of Hillary Clinton” whose identities are not clear. (Men in the shadows?)

• According to an insider account, the Clinton team, put together the Russia Gate narrative within 24 hours of her defeat.
• The scurrilous Trump dossier, prepared by a London opposition research firm, Orbis, was paid for by unidentified Democrat donors.
• According to the BBC, “the opposition research firm that commissioned the report had worked first for an anti-Trump Super Pac – political action committee – during the Republican primaries. Then during the general election, it was funded by an anonymous Democratic Party supporter.”   

     David Satter, one of our top experts on Russia and himself expelled by the Kremlin, writes, "Perhaps most important, Russian intelligence acted to sabotage Mr. Trump. The ‘Trump dossier, full of unverified sexual and political allegations.  Fusion and Steele were paid by Democratic donors whose identity remains secret. The most likely explanation is that the anti-Trump-Steele dossier is the work of Russian intelligence "novelists" charged by the Kremlin with defaming Trump and adding chaos to the American political system." Writes Satter, “Perhaps the time has come to expand the investigation into Russia’s meddling to include Mrs. Clinton’s campaign as well.”

      It gets worse, the FBI was involved. "The FBI received a copy of the Democrat-funded dossier in August, during the heat of the campaign, and is said to have contracted in October to pay Steele $50,000 to help corroborate the dirt on Trump — a relationship that “raises substantial questions about the independence” of the bureau in investigating Trump."  - Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley.

      Why was the FBI meddling in a U.S. presidential election? Partisan interference in the election by public agencies like the FBI and major news sources like NBC are far more worrisome than anything Russians allegedly might do from afar. Now, Senate investigators are demanding to see records of communications between Fusion GPS and the FBI and the Justice Department, including any contacts with former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, now under congressional investigation for possibly obstructing the Hillary Clinton email probe, and deputy FBI director Andrew McCabe, who is under investigation by the Senate and the Justice inspector general for failing to recuse himself despite financial and political connections to the Clinton campaign through his Democrat activist wife. Senate investigators have singled out McCabe as the FBI official who negotiated with Steele. Like Fusion GPS, the FBI has failed to cooperate with congressional investigators seeking documents. “When political opposition research becomes the basis for law enforcement or intelligence efforts, it raises substantial questions about the independence of law enforcement and intelligence from politics,” - Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley

      Then on July 26 Senate Democrats used a parliamentary maneuver  “to cut short a high-profile hearing, where a key witness was set to testify on Russia’s misdeeds” and allegations against Fusion GPS. It appears that the Democratic Party has successfully corrupted the FBI as well as the CIA.

      The Fusion-Steele matter is explosive because it suggests that Russia’s most damaging intervention in the 2016 campaign may have been its creation of the Steele Dossier, remarkably paid for by the Clinton campaign! If so, the Clinton campaign (not Trump) was the prime sponsor of Russia’s intervention in the 2016 election. When will the truth come out?

The New World Order's Grip on America

By

        George Sontag

      Today, it’s no secret that a small group of elite people, the corporations they run, and the big banks who own them, have gained control over our healthcare, economics, education, food and energy supply, and pretty much every other conceivable aspect of our lives by controlling the world of finance. Prior to ‘credible’ people coming forward in an attempt to create awareness about the New World Order agenda, it was considered a conspiracy by most.

      The New World Order is the goal of a handful of global elitists who are pushing for a one world government and a heightened national security state. Those pushing for the New World Order are the same members of the elite class who control the U.S. government, otherwise referred to as the “shadow government.” The shadow government includes

billionaire families like the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, members of the financial elite like George Soros, and large corporations and big banks. This group, often referred to as the cabal, has been using foreign threats to heighten security, strip us of our rights, and invade other countries. In order to accomplish this goal, this group uses false flag terrorism and the fear of global threats to impose increased security measures on domestic populations to justify the invasion of other countries like Iraq and Syria. False flag terrorism is run by covert operations designed to deceive and manipulate in such a way as to appear as though they had been carried out by groups, nations, or entities other than those who actually planned and executed them.

      David Rockefeller’s own words as recorded in his “Memoirs.”

"Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – one world, if you will,” he wrote. “If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”

      Countless politicians and presidents have told the world, over and over again, that a ‘hidden hand’ or ‘invisible’ government is really in charge, and that this ‘shadow’ government is free from the law itself, doing whatever it wants while amassing enormous amounts of power and perpetuating the military industrial complex.

      We live in a world of secrecy, one in which transparency efforts like those of Julian Assange and Edward Snowden are condemned. The fact is that only the truth threatens

their entire system of control, it threatens the interests of the global elite, and it threatens their ability to keep us quiet but the grip that corporate media has on the minds of the masses is strong. It does a great job at keeping the world ignorant and oblivious to events and concerns being raised by many experts, in various fields, from all over the world.
It creates “fake news”(propaganda)

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our (Bilderburger) meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost 40 years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years.” - David Rockefeller


      Just how close is such an Orwellian nightmare to the America of 2017? How much has already arrived, cloaked in a velvet glove wrapped around an iron hammer; a hammer a mass media-blinded public begs to have used upon itself in the interests of its own so-called "security?"

      Unfortunately, the common theory that Democrats and Republicans are merely two wings of the same bird, sharing the same doners, the elite. If there is one major problem with this entire political process, it’s that it gives us the illusion of democracy. Think about it: With the entire American political system lying in the hands of a small group of people and the corporations they run, all held together by the big banks, what good does electing an outsider as president who has absolutely no power do anything and if he tries, he is subject to daily attacks from the cabal's collaborators?

The Western Elite's Fake Boogeyman

By

       Phillip Todd*

      Last week I spoke of the western elites desire to conquer Russia to exploit their natural resources for profit. They have attempted to undermine the President's popularity in order to overthrow his regime. They have tried to antagonize Russia's military by running NATO complete with troops, armor, and nuclear weapons right up to their border. They have attempted a coup to get to the underside of the country and seize a vital military base in the Crimean. To prevent a hostile NATO from establishing its own naval base in the Black Sea, Russia had to take Crimea, which in any case is historically Russian territory.

      Today, they have the US military flying fighter planes and sailing warships all over the Black Sea which was once referred to as a “Russian lake.” They are “poking the bear” with every chance they get short of a nuclear exchange-for now. They are still uncertain of Putin and Russia because they see the world through western eyes.

      Putin's Russia does not see the world as we do. How irreconcilable those world views are is seen in Russia’s conflict with Ukraine two years ago. According to the official United States account, Russia invaded its neighbor after a glorious revolution threw out a plutocracy. Russia then annexed Ukrainian naval bases in the Crimea. According to the Russian and other non-western countries view, Ukraine’s democratically elected government was overthrown by an armed uprising backed by the United States.

      One theme runs through Russian foreign policy, and has for much of its history. There is no country that has a more dangerous frontier with the Islamic world. You would think that this would be the primary lens through which to view Russian conduct—a good place for the West to begin in trying to explain Russian behavior that, at first glance, does not have an obvious rationale. Yet agitation against Putin in the West has not focused on that at all.

      Domestically, Russia is a conservative country. Their values are a complete contradiction of the western elites Progressive Corporate Socialistic agenda. The two episodes of concerted outrage about Putin among western Progressives have both involved issues trivial to the world, but vital to the world of Progressivism. World Socialism's success depends on the destruction of national traditions and identity.

      The first episode is destruction of religious morals. The young women called themselves Pussy Riot, performance artists who were jailed for violating Russia’s blasphemy laws when they disrupted a religious service with obscene chants about God on the alter of a large Christian church. The obscene translations were almost never shown on controlled Western television. The Progressive narrative in the west was how “freedom” of expression was being denied. Ask yourselves, what would the response be if this behavior happened in a church or mosque in the United States?

      The second episode was the passage of Russia’s Article 6.21, which was falsely described in the American press as a law against “so—called gay propaganda.” A more accurate translation of what the law forbids is promoting “non-traditional sexual relations to children.” Homosexuality is openly practiced, although frowned upon, in Russia. This law was meant to protect the children until they could become mature enough to make their own decisions unlike today in the United States where babies are now being prepped for gender (re)assignment. Some Americans might wish that Russia took religion or homosexuality less seriously and still be struck by the fact that these are very local issues. There is something sinister about turning them into diplomatic incidents and issuing all kinds of threats because of them.

      One of the more independent thinkers about Russia was a member of the U.S. Congress who was being scolded at a dinner in Washington a few years ago. A fellow guest told him he should be ashamed, because Reagan would have idealistically stood up to Putin on human rights. The Congressman disagreed, “Reagan's gift as a foreign policy thinker, he said, was not his idealism. It was his ability to set priorities, to see what constituted the biggest threat.” Today’s biggest threat to the US. isn’t Vladimir Putin. It is our overseers who continue to rush us to war – for profit.

*Many thanks to Christopher Caldwell for his helpful insights on the preparation of this article.

Who Is This Russian Boogeyman?

by

       Phillip Todd*

      Vladimir Vladimirovich is the elected leader of Russia, relatively poor, militarily powerful country that in recent years has been frequently humiliated, robbed, and misled. His job has been to protect his country’s prerogatives and its sovereignty in an international system that seeks to erode sovereignty in general in favor of a one world government and views Russia’s sovereignty, in particular, as a threat to that goal.

      Putin did not come out of nowhere. You can get a better idea of why he has ruled for 17 years if you remember that, within a few years of Communism’s fall, average life expectancy in Russia had fallen below that of Bangladesh. There are two things Putin did that cemented the loyalty of the Russian people, he restrained the billionaires who were looting the country, and he restored Russia’s standing abroad. Russian people not only tolerate him, they revere him. 

      When Putin took power in the winter of 1999-2000, his country was defenseless. It was bankrupt. It was being carved up by its new elites, in collusion with its old imperial rivals, the West. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn wrote “As a result of the Yeltsin era, all the fundamental sectors of our political, economic, cultural, and moral life have been destroyed or looted. Will we continue looting and destroying Russia until nothing is left?” The world's elite had them where they wanted them. The untapped treasures of natural resources that they had waited decades to exploit looked as if, finally, were there for the taking.

      Putin changed that. He refused, forcefully, with ever blunter rhetoric, to accept for Russia a subservient role in an American-run world system drawn up by foreign politicians and business leaders. He rescued his nation state, and gave it coherence and purpose. He disciplined his country’s plutocrats. He restored its military strength. His voters credit him with having saved his country. He put a stop to the deceitful attempted take-over of his country. The controlled western media immediately attacked. He would not do as he was told. 

      Under Communism there was oligarchic control of natural resources. The transfer of Russia’s natural resources into the hands of KGB—connected Communists, who called themselves businessmen, was a shameful one for the West. Western political scientists provided the theft with ideological cover, presenting it as a “transition to capitalism.” Western corporations, including banks, provided the financing as the elite began it's plan to carve up the country.

      Putin came to call these people “state-appointed billionaires.” He saw them as a conduit for looting Russia, and sought to restore to the country what had been stolen from it. He also saw that Russia needed to reclaim control of its vast reserves of oil and gas, on which much of Europe depended, because that was the only geopolitical lever it had left.

      The other thing Putin did was restore the country’s position abroad. He arrived in power a decade after his country had suffered a Vietnam-like defeat in Afghanistan. Following that defeat, it had failed to halt a bloody Islamist uprising in Chechnya. And worst of all, it had been humiliated by the United States and NATO in the Serbian war of 1999, when the Clinton administration backed a nationalist and Islamist independence movement in Kosovo. This was the last war in which the United States would fight on the same side as Osama Bin Laden, and the US used the opportunity to show Russia its lowly place in the international order, treating it as a nuisance and an afterthought. Furiously nationalistic, when Putin took office he stated, “We will not tolerate any humiliation to the national pride of Russians, or any threat to the integrity of the country,” and he meant it. He beat back the military advance of lslamist armies in Chechnya and Dagestan, and he took a hard line on terrorism—including a decision not to negotiate with hostage-takers, even in secret.

      The main theme of attack on Putin and Russia is do attempt to de-legitimize the president and de-stabilize the country once again as to leave it open to their exploitation. The controlled western media has gone into overdrive to accomplish this. The current is attempt started by the outgoing Obama puppet administration to cast doubt on the legitimacy of last November’s presidential election by implying that the Russian government somehow “hacked” it. This is an extraordinary episode in the history of manufacturing opinion. Anyone who has read the public documentation on which the claims rest will find only speculation, opinions, and attempts to make repetition do the work of logic. They have been beating this dead horse to a pulp.

      There are other steams of mis-information that the western media has attacked Putin with. In November, the Washington Post ran a blacklist of news organizations that had published “fake news” in the service of Putin, but the list turned out to have been compiled largely by a fly—by-night political activist group called PropOrNot, which had placed certain outlets on the list only because their views coincided with those of RT on given issues. Then in December, the Obama administration claimed to have found Russian computer code it melodramatically called “Grizzly Steppe” in the Vermont electrical grid. 
This made front-page headlines. But it was a mistake. The so-called Russian code could be bought commercially, and it was found, according to one journalist, “in a single laptop that was not connected to the electric grid.”

      Why is the West doing this? Russians has long been thought of as 'less than human.” That European idea dates back centuries well before the founding of the United States. That subject will be shelved for another day. Today, it is the exploitation of it's abundant natural resources at the lowest cost by means of political upheaval that drives the western elite's campaign against Putin's Russia. More on this subject and their continuing efforts next week.

*Many thanks to Christopher Caldwell for his helpful insights on the preparation of this article.

On This Fourth of July We Are Destroying Our True History

By

       Zeno Potas

     Samuel Adams once said, “A general dissolution of principles and manners will more surely overthrow the liberties of America than the whole force of the common enemy. While the people are virtuous they cannot be subdued; but when once they lose their virtue then will be ready to surrender their liberties to the first external or internal invader.” He and the other framers of the Constitution understood that liberty was rare in world history and that it would be no easy task to design a system that would both maximize and preserve it. Until recently most Americans cherished this system precisely because it was uniquely equipped to accomplish those purposes. Today forces within the country are out to destroy it.

     Slavery is an undeniable fact of our history. The

costly war fought to end it is also a part of the nation's history. Neither will go away through cultural cleansing. The current trend of attempting to rewrite history by eliminating undesirable people and removing statues of Confederates and renaming buildings are just a small part of the true agenda of America's Progressive Socialists. It is a typical Communist action which became part of Soviet Unions' effort to ensure that the correct ideological and political spin was put on their history. Now it is being done here.

      The removal of statues of southern statesmen with the justification that they were pro-slavery or owned slaves (all were Democrats) does a disservice to us all. We may disagree with them but it was a different world then and it is our history as distasteful as it may be. To remain a great nation, we should be able to stand up to the truth about ourselves, not hide it because it offends some.

   

  The successful removal of these reminders will not satisfy the Progressives. It will not be the end of it but rather only the beginning. Thomas Jefferson owned slaves as did many of this country's Founders. There's a monument that bears his name -- the Thomas Jefferson Memorial in Washington, D.C. George Washington also owned slaves, and there's a monument to him, as well -- the Washington Monument in Washington. I can see a day when these will “have to” be removed along with all of the other names of the Founders on schools, bridges, and cities because they are “old white slave owners.”

      Our currency and coinage will also “have to” be re-designed. Washington on the dollar bill and the quarter, Jefferson on the two and the nickle, Andrew Jackson, the first Democrat President on the twenty, owned a mercantile business that engaged in the domestic slave trade, at times accepting slaves in exchange for dry goods, using them to pay off debts, or mortgaging them for loans. Benjamin Franklin on the hundred dollar bill also must go.

      If this type of Progressive thinking persists, our grandchildren will never know the truth about their heritage. The first great battle for the American soul was settled in the Civil War. The second battle for America's soul, initiated over a century ago, is still raging. The choice for the Founders' constitutionalism or the Progressive-liberal administrative state is yet to be fully resolved. Instead of celebrating our nation's birth on this fourth of July, American Patriots should reflect on just how far away from the Founder's principals we have strayed and resolve to bring us back to the true America that our forefathers died for.