The Media's Bias Exposed

By

       George Sontag

      The Democrats and their friends in the media are vigorously looking to expose “fake news.” The trouble is, they’re looking in the wrong places. They need to head to the nearest mirror. We knew the media were overwhelmingly liberal, but the truth and the proof can be seen in the Politico Poll of White House Press Corps which found that Democrat reporters out numbered Republicans by a margin of 60 – 3.

      That's correct, media, starting with the White House Press Corps, is overwhelmingly slanted towards one political party. Of these Forty-five percent said their coverage was biased against Trump, while two percent said they were biased in his favor, and 53 percent said they were not biased either way. At least that's what the 53 percent claim. Still 45 percent admit to slanting their stories – Left.

      This small sampling of some of the most important reporters in our country proves that there is a cultural shift in which journalists have moved, from reporting news, to spewing opinion disguised as fact. THIS IS THE TRUE NATURE OF “FAKE NEWS.” (Fake news is news reported with opinions and speculation.) There were days, long past, when reporters reported on the news. This means they listed the facts surrounding events and allowed viewers or listeners to make up their minds to form their own opinions. Today, many reporters no longer attempt to report, but instead give their audiences their version of what happened. (aka – Fake news)

Whatever happened to objective, professional journalism? In a free society the role of the press is to:

• 1. Serve as watchdog for our local/federal elected officials.

• 2. Inform readers to know what’s going on in the cultural as well as the political realm.
• 3. Generate an awareness of our country, states, and cities.

• 4. Get us mad about anything going wrong, and enough to do something about it.

      Today, Americans must recognize how much the condensed, controlled media have turned into a softer version of the old Soviet Union’s Pravda. So it should not be surprising that journalists and contributors from just about every major media outlet have been exposed by Wikileaks for their bias. Media bias isn’t just how they cover what they cover - it’s what they choose to ignore. The profession that congratulates itself with more awards, dinners, and honors than any other and prides itself for “speaking truth to power” has been fully exposed as the shield and the sword for the powerful. While Democrats implode, the media plays guard dog.

      Ever since Operation Mockingbird, a CIA-based

initiative to control mainstream media, more and more people are expressing their concern that what we see in the media is nothing short of brainwashing, and by and large, no more than a propaganda arm for the Democrat Party, and their actions now, especially as compared to the past eight years, out them as such. A number of ‘whistleblowers’ who actually worked in the industry have come out and said the exact same thing. Just one example is the Huffington Post. It’s an ultra-left wing blog with media credentials, but many people actually believe what they read there.

      "Fake news” simply works to distract us from what’s

truly going on in the world and replaces it a narrative of the organization's agenda. Nearly two-thirds (63%) of Americans say they’re either “regularly” (27%) or “occasionally” being fed fake news by traditional major TV and newspaper outlets. That's 90% of the American public believe that they are being lied to. I’m not suggesting you lock yourself in a room or run away and never look at the media again. I’m simply recommending that you stay conscious of your surroundings and critically think about what’s actually happening!

      So, the next time you’re watching a movie, reading an article, or listening to a song, ask yourself: What’s the real meaning behind this? Trust your intuition and don’t be afraid to investigate where the story came from, what the overarching message is, and more importantly, who it benefits.

Doublespeak* - The Language of Modern America

by

       Zeno Potas

Def. Doublespeak:

• Language that deliberately disguises, distorts, reverses, or redefines meaning to further an agenda.
  
• Doublespeak is language which pretends to communicate but doesn't. It is language which makes the bad seem good, the negative seem positive, the unpleasant seem unattractive. It is language which avoids, shifts or denies responsibility.
• Doublespeak may take the form of euphemisms, unsupported generalizations, or deliberate ambiguity. Contrast with plain English.
• It is language which conceals or prevents thought.

       Doublespeak is a tool of Socialism and used religiously by the Left in this country. It is most closely associated with political language. "Political language . . . is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind." -George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language,"-1946.

       Let us delve into today's world of our controlled media's codewords as to better understand exactly what they are trying to convey by stating what they are not stating.

  “Peaceful Protest” – No liberals were hurt while throwing bricks through windows, demanding “Death to the pigs” or getting together in large gangs to waylay small, lone counter protesters from behind.

“Love Trumps Hate” – Screaming obscenities, smashing windows and assaulting people to show that you’re loving and they’re hateful.

“Fake News” – News from non-liberal sources.

“Choice” – A wonderful thing when it comes to killing babies, but awful when it’s applied to guns, schools, opting out of Social security or having less government in your life.

“Sexism” – Disagreeing with the abortion of female babies or being against mentally ill men being allowed to use the bathroom with women.

“Corporate Welfare” – Something that’s horrible and should never happen unless it involves Planned Parenthood, PBS or NPR.

“Voter Suppression” -- Cutting into Democrat vote totals by taking any steps to prevent voter fraud.

“Bipartisanship” – When Republicans cooperate with Democrats to push the liberal agenda. Not to be confused with “selling out” which happens when liberals cooperate with Republicans to push their agenda

“The American Flag” - A symbol of oppression waved by ignorant citizens dumb enough to think that this is a great place to live.

“The Constitution” – An outdated, irrelevant document that should be ignored unless you are claiming that some liberal agenda item is guaranteed by it despite the fact that no one noticed it for 200 years.

“Fascist” - People who want to cut spending, abide by the Constitution and get the government off your back.

“Diversity” – A group of liberals who agree on every single issue, but also must be gay, black, female, Hispanic or transsexual.

“Racist” -- Those who believe that people should be judged by the content of their character, not the color of their skin and those who believe in enforcing the immigration laws that are already on the books.

“Climate change denier” -- Someone who actually judges global warming based on the available scientific evidence instead of coming up with a socialistic agenda first and then passing out grant money to any scientists who are willing to attempt to justify it.

“Angry, white male” – A white guy who votes Republican.

“Radical Islam” – Words you’re not supposed to say because it may make people who are trying to kill us in the name of their religion mad.

       We speak a different language within the United States. It is the language of deceit – smoke and mirrors. A five second soundbite taken out of context becomes truth within hours of it's publication. Keeping America confused and at each others throats to distract everyone from what is really happening allows their covert agenda to move forward. It is an un-Constitutional, anti-American agenda and Patriots....in the war for truth, we are losing.

*The word doublespeak is a neologism based on the compounds Newspeak and Doublethink in George Orwell's novel 1984 (1949)

ANOTHER CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATION? - ANOTHER FALSE FLAG? - THE SYRIAN CHEMICAL WEAPONS ATTACK

by

       Phillip Todd 

 

  

     The president needs congressional authorization for military action as required by the Constitution. The Constitution says “war must be declared by Congress."

For most of American history, the consensus view among politicians and legal scholars was that the Founding Fathers meant for Congress to have the "sole authority" in deciding to initiate any hostilities or war with another country. Although this remains the most common view among academics, actual practice has diverged significantly, said Andrew Kent, a law professor at Fordham University and an expert in the Constitution

and national security.

       The Constitution says only Congress has the power to declare war, but throughout the past 70 years or so, presidents have adopted a flexible view of their own constitutional role as commander-in-chief in order to engage in military action without congressional approval. Yet the courts have not settled some constitutional questions about what is war and who gets to decide when the United States attacks. "Hence, there is a kind of customary law of war initiation in modern times that has supplanted a long-held view, and the view of the Founders, about what the Constitution means," Kent said.

       That said, the strike against the so-called culprits in the chemical attacks, were blatantly unconstitutional because they were first, not needed to defend our country and in no way were in the national interest, secondly, against a foreign government that is not a threat nor have ever threatened the United States, thirdly, and most important, there is no reliable proof that the Syrian government was responsible – just the opposite.

       Many, around the world who are not afraid of the power of the United States, have openly criticized and offered proof that this was a false flag operation perpetuated by the “shadow government” that many feel now controls America.

       Here are the facts and the comments, not propaganda, of those outside the U.S. control of information:

• “In the light of recent developments and accusations directed against the Syrian government, it is important once more to set the record straight: the US supported rebels possess chemical weapons. Documents how the Pentagon not only provided chemical weapons to Al Nusra, an affiliated Al Qaeda terrorist organization, but also provided training to the rebels in the use of these weapons. While Washington continues to point its finger at president Bashar al Assad, a United Nations independent commission of inquiry confirmed as early as May 2013 that the rebels rather than the government have chemical weapons in their possession and were using sarin nerve gas against the civilian population. 
  
  
      - Michel Chossudovsky, an award winning author, Professor of Economics at the University of Ottawa, Founder and Director of the Center for Research on Globalization, Montreal, and the Editor of Global Research.
  
  

• Evidence Shows Pentagon Trained Syria’s Rebels in the Use of Chemical Weapons

  http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/04/11/evidence-shows-the-pentagon-trained-syrias-al-qaeda-rebels-in-the-use-of-chemical-weapons-rush/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Collective-evolution+%28Collective+Evolution%29

  

     The problem here is that not long ago Democratic lawmakers and Obama administration officials touted that Syria turned over 100% of it's chemical weapon stockpile. “We struck a deal where we got a hundred percent of the chemical weapons out,” then Secreatry of State John Kerry stated.

• "...there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an intensified entity representing the ‘devil’ only in order to drive TV watchers to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind thispropaganda is the United States."
  - Robin Cook, former British Foreign Secretary
  
  
  
  
  WHITE HOUSE PRESS SECRETARY SLIPS UP & ADMITS U.S. PLANS TO “DESTABILIZE SYRIA?”
• http://www.collective-evolution.com/2017/04/10/white-house-press-secretary-slips-up-admits-u-s-plans-to-destabilize-syria/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+Collective-evolution+%28Collective+Evolution%29 

"The President must get Congressional approval before attacking Syria-big mistake if he does not!" Trump tweeted Aug. 30, 2013.

Poison Gas Attacks KNOWN 24 Hours Before It Happened!!!!!!!!!  

      If this were clearly a surprise attack by the Syrian government - how did the rebels have knowledge of it before it happened and if so, why did they not bring it to the attention of the world? Something is rotten and it's not in Denmark, Patriots.

UPDATE: MIT expert claims latest chemical weapons attack in Syria was staged 

https://www.yahoo.com/news/mit-expert-claims-latest-chemical-100819428.html

Did the Russian Hacks Come from Inside the U.S. Government?

By

       M. Richard Maxson

      The state of Georgia has revealed that the Department of Homeland Security has attempted to hack their election system 10 different times since February 2nd of this year. In an exclusive interview, a visibly frustrated Secretary of State Brian Kemp confirmed the attacks of different levels on his agency’s network over the last 10 months. He says they all traced back to DHS internet provider addresses.

      Georgia first revealed on December 8th the state discovered an attempt to hack it’s election system that originated from an IP address that was tracked to the United States Department of Homeland Security. Before leaving office the Obama administration confirmed the attacks originated at the DHS but has refused to provide a straight story on why the attempted hackings occurred.

      Georgia’s Secretary of State has now confirmed that its election systems were the subject of cyberattacks on 10 separate occasions with each attack originating from a Department of Homeland Security IP address. With each attack occurring around critical registration and voting deadlines, Kemp said. Attacks of different levels occurred on his agency's network over the last 10 months. They all traced back to DHS internet provider addresses.

      The first one happened on Feb. 2, 2016, the day after Georgia’s voter registration deadline. The next one took place just days before the SEC primary. Another occurred in May, the day before the general primary, and then two more took place in November, the day before and the day of the presidential election.

      Why someone with a DHS IP address (216.81.81.80) had attempted to hack into his state’s election database on November 15, 2016 at 8:43AM? Furious with the lack of answers, he got from DHS Secretary Jeb Johnson, Georgia’s Secretary of State Brian Kemp fired off a letter to loop in President Donald Trump asking for a formal review. “We just need to ask the new administration to take a look at this and make sure that we get the truth.

      As a reminder NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden warned the public that the NSA controls servers all over the world and they can easily frame China or Russia for such attacks. The government’s secret anti-forensic program, Marble Framework, allows them to direct blame for the alleged hacks onto another party by hiding fragments of texts that would allow the author of the malware to be identified. Perhaps more alarmingly, they can also “add foreign languages” to malware, meaning that the agency can effectively divert attention to other countries. The program lists Chinese, Russian, Korean, Arabic, and Farsi. So, if malware and hacks are indeed domestic, they could easily be made to look as though they originated from another country. Given the National Security Agency is under the Department of Homeland Security their claims to attribute the so-called Russia hack attempts to Russian IP addresses are now suspect.

      After investigating the matter the Department of Homeland Security announced the attempt to infiltrate the Georgia’s election was a one-off committed by a rogue agent. But Georgia’s Secretary of State says the DHS’ story about its source keeps changing. “First it was an employee in Corpus Christi, and now it’s a contractor in Georgia,” Kemp said.

      He stated that several of those scans came around the same time he testified before Congress about his opposition to a federal plan to classify election systems as “critical infrastructure,” like power plants and financial systems. *Note: the so-called cyberattacks on Connecticut's power grid, originally tied to Russia, were also proven false.

      As we’ve said before, despite all the media attention on “Russian hackers,” this cyberattack, originated from within our own Department of Homeland Security, is the only actual confirmed case of hacking related to the 2016 election.

Communism's Goals Have Taken Hold of America

by

          Zeno Potas

       Progressivism was the word used in the early twentieth century to denote Socialist ideas of big government while stopping just short of Communism. The word Progressivism is still used today in the West as a proxy for a Socialist form of government. Many believe that the end result of a Socialist state is, inevitably - Communism, the loss of all individuality and freedoms. In this country it would be the end of the Constitution.

But could it happen - now? 

 

       In The Art of War, written 2500 years ago, Sun Tzu said, "Fighting on a battlefield is the most primitive way of making war. There is no art higher than to destroy your enemy without a fight by subverting anything of value in his country." 

 

       On January 10, 1963, the House of Representative and later the Senate began reviewing a document entitled "Communist Goals for Taking Over America." It contained an agenda of 45 separate issues that, in hindsight was quite shocking back then and equally shocking today. As in the book The Naked Communist written by FBI agent Cleon Skousen, it is a series of Communist goals for incapacitating the US without firing a shot. 

 

       The list of 45 Communist goals contained in the book was read into the Congressional Record (Appendix, pp. A34-A35) by U.S. Congressman Albert S. Herlong, Jr. of Florida, on January 10, 1963

Here, in part, are some key points listed in that document.

• Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

• Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats, white slave owners, who had no concern for the "common man."

• Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

• Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

• Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the Progressive party line in textbooks.

• Gain control of all student newspapers.

• Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are counter to Progressive views.

• Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.

• Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures for propaganda purposes.

• Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

• Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

• Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

• Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."

• Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

• Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture."

• Support any Progressive movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

• Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use "united force" to solve economic, political or social problems.

      Now, I am not saying that the U.S. is under some kind of Communist control, but what I do find frightening, is of the issues listed, all of them have come to pass. Remember this was in January 1963. The year in now 2017 and the number of these "goals" that have completely engulfed our society should chill every Constitutionalist to their bones.