Ukraine Investigates Democrat Election Interference

by

       Phillip Todd

      In September 2019, House Democrats launched a formal impeachment inquiry into President Trump over a whistleblower's accusation that he threatened to withhold aid to Ukraine as a pressure tactic to force the Ukrainian government to investigate allegations that Joe Biden's son Hunter benefited financially from the firing of that same Ukrainian prosecutor. That’s the story out in the public domain but the real reason the president wanted the investigation reopened was to uncover, discretely, what is known throughout Europe - Foreign election interference by Democratic operatives who were in Ukraine and Italy attempting to dig up dirt on Donald Trump in order to help Hillary Clinton win the election.

      Ukrainian law enforcement officials believe they have evidence of wrongdoing by American Democrats and their allies in Kiev, ranging from 2016 election interference to obstructing criminal probes. One focus of Ukrainian investigators, Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s International Legal Cooperation Department said that money had been spirited unlawfully out of Ukraine and moved to the United States by businessmen friendly to the prior, pro‐Russia regime of Viktor Yanukovych. Ukrainian businessmen "authorized payments for lobbying efforts directed at the U.S. government," he stated. In addition, these payments were made from funds that were acquired during the money‐laundering operation. "We have information that a U.S. company was involved in these payments." That company is tied to one or more prominent Democrats, Ukrainian officials insist. Prosecutor General Yuriy Lutsenko, stated that he has enough evidence particularly involving Biden, his family and money spirited out of Ukraine ‐ to warrant a meeting with U.S. Attorney General William Barr. "I'm looking forward to meeting with the attorney general of the United States in order to start and facilitate our joint investigation regarding the appropriation of another $7 billion in U.S. dollars with Ukrainian legal origin," Lutsenko said.

      In another instance, he said, Ukrainian authorities gathered evidence that money paid to an American Democrat allegedly was hidden by Ukraine's National Anti‐Corruption Bureau ﴾NABU﴿ during the 2016 election under pressure from U.S. officials. "In the course of this investigation, we found that there was a situation during which influence was exerted on the NABU, so that the name of [the American] would not be mentioned," he said. Ukrainian officials say they don't want to hand the evidence to FBI agents working in Ukraine because they believe the bureau has a close relationship with the NABU and the U.S. Embassy. "It is no secret in Ukrainian political circles that the NABU was created with American help and tried to exert influence during the U.S. presidential election," Kulyk stated. Any investigation into any Democrat (Joe and Hunter Biden) would surly expose this truth.

      The left leaning Politico reported in 2017 on evidence of Ukraine's U.S. embassy helping the Clinton campaign to discredit Trump. "A Ukrainian‐American operative who was consulting for the Democratic National Committee met with top officials in the Ukrainian Embassy in Washington in an effort to expose ties between Trump, top campaign aide Paul Manafort and Russia," the newspaper reported. Ukraine's evidence, if true, would mark the first documented allegation of Democrats receiving assistance from a foreign power in their efforts to help Clinton win the 2016 election.

      There is public‐source information, in Ukraine and in the United States, that gives credence to some of what Ukrainian prosecutors allege. A court in Ukraine formally concluded that law enforcement officials there illegally tried to intervene in the 2016 U.S. election by leaking documents of Manafort's business dealings after he was named Trump's campaign chairman. And a Ukrainian parliamentarian released a purported tape recording of a top Ukrainian law enforcement official bragging that he was responsible for the leak and was trying to help Clinton win. Lutsenko told Hill.TV in an interview aired last week that he has opened a criminal investigation into those allegations. Nellie Ohr, wife of a senior Justice official and a researcher for the Fusion GPS opposition research firm, testified to Congress last year that some of Fusion GPS's research on Trump-Russia ties came from a Ukrainian parliamentarian. The Democratic Party and the Clinton campaign paid Fusion GPS to dig up dirt on Trump.

       Why isn’t this front page news? Because the investigator was terminated after refusing to drop the investigation into Burisma and Joe’s son, Hunter Biden. Financial records showing a Ukrainian natural gas company routed more than $3 million to American accounts tied to Hunter Biden, younger son of then‐Vice President Joe Biden, who managed U.S.‐Ukraine relations for the Obama administration. Biden's son served on the board of a Ukrainian natural gas company, Burisma Holdings. Records shown that Vice President Biden pressured Ukrainian officials in March 2016 to fire the prosecutor who oversaw an investigation of Burisma Holdings and who planned to interview Hunter Biden about:

• The financial transfers

• Correspondence showing members of the State Department and U.S. Embassy in Kiev interfered or applied pressure in criminal cases on Ukrainian soil.

• Disbursements of as much as $7 billion in Ukrainian funds that prosecutors believe may have been misappropriated or taken out of the country, including to the United States.

• Sworn statements from two Ukrainian officials admitting that their agency tried to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election in favor of Hillary Clinton.

• Contacts between Democratic figures in Washington and Ukrainian officials that involved passing along dirt on Donald Trump.

      So bold were the Democrats that on January 18, 2018 bragged about his meeting with Ukrainian officials. Biden said, “I remember going over, convincing our team, our leaders to— convincing that we should be providing for loan guarantees. And I went over, I guess, the 12th, 13th time to Kiev. And I was supposed to announce that there was another billion-dollar loan guarantee. And I had gotten a commitment from Poroshenko and from Yatsenyuk that they would take action against the state prosecutor, and they didn’t. I said, ‘I’m telling you, you’re not getting the billion dollars,” Biden boasted of his threats to Ukraine’s leaders. “I said, ‘You’re not getting the billion. I’m going to be leaving here in’ — I think it was about six hours — I looked at them and said, ‘I’m leaving in six hours. If the prosecutor is not fired, you’re not getting the money.’ Well, son of a bitch — he got fired.”

                                                 Quid Pro Quo

       Kostiantyn Kulyk, deputy head of the Prosecutor General’s International Legal Cooperation Department confirmed Ukraine is investigating that alleged incident: "We have evidence and witnesses stating that Joe Biden applied pressure on Ukrainian law enforcement to stop the investigation."

      The head of Burisma Holdings, Nikolai Zlochevsky, was reportedly indicted in Ukraine this week, and Ukrainian members of parliament are demanding that President Donald J. Trump and president of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, investigate. The indictment claims that $7.4 billion was laundered by the “family” of ex-President Viktor Yanukovych through American investment fund Franklin Templeton Investments. They also allege that the investment fund has ties to the U.S. Democratic Party, according to Ukraine news agency. This is big news in Europe but almost non-existent in the U.S. media. We will keep you updated on future events.

Involuntary Treason is Still Treason Under the Law - Part 2

by

        M. Richard Maxson

      The greatest scandal in American history is unfolding, or not, before our eyes. The so-called impeachment is the latest smoke screen by a desperate coalition of party loyalists and anti-constitutionals to fundamentally change America. The Russian connection, that they paid for, has turned out to be what is was – false and they are losing control of the narrative as the Justice Department’s criminal investigation into the previous administration continues. They appear solemnly in front of cameras daily as their “secret investigation” leaks continuously from one direction. The American Constitutionalist will continue to print the facts – the truth, as difficult as it can be to differentiate from the smoke, mirrors, and outright lies being fed to the American people on a daily basis. 

     In part one we disclosed the fact that by February of 2016 it was known that 2,101 e-mails that were outside of the government's protection were retroactively marked as classified and 22 being upgraded to top secret and one of the final unclassified emails is being withheld from the public at the request of law enforcement. Was this just sloppiness or incompetence as the administration was saying or was it to intentionally allow foreign powers access to this information? Either way it is a clear violation of the Espionage Act. Whether voluntary or involuntary the Espionage Act does not differentiate. It states, "Whoever...having lawful possession or control of any… document relating to national defense…(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from it’s proper place of custody… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years or both."

     Between March 1st and the election in November the administration and the Democratic party went into full blown damage control to protect their now candidate for president. The cover-up began.

 

The Timeline continues

• March 2, 2016 -- Bryan Pagliano has agreed to provide an interview with investigators and accepted an offer of immunity from the FBI and the Justice Department. Pagliano is a former Clinton staffer who helped set up the private email server.

• April 10, 2016 -- Obama defends Clinton in an interview on "Fox News Sunday" but "guarantees" that he will not interfere with the ongoing investigation into her private email server.
  
• May 25, 2016 -- A State Department Inspector General report says Clinton failed to follow the rules or inform key department staff regarding her use of a private email server. The report states: "At a minimum, Secretary Clinton should have surrendered all emails dealing with Department business before leaving government service and, because she did not do so, she "did not comply with the Department's policies that were implemented in accordance with the Federal Records Act."

•  June 9, 2016 -- Judicial Watch announces that State lawyers could not track which employees were conducting business on the Clinton email server.

• June 22, 2016 -- Earlier Judge Emmet G. Sullivan approved a proposal by Judicial Watch and the State Department to take depositions from current and former State Department officials. A spokeswoman for Judicial Watch says that during Bryan Pagliano's deposition, he invoked the 5th Amendment approximately 125 consecutive times. 

• June 27, 2016 -- Attorney General Loretta Lynch stated eight days earlier that the Justice Department probe into Clinton's emails was being conducted the same as similar investigations. "The investigation into the State Department email matter is going to be handled like any other matter. We've got career agents and lawyers looking at that. They will follow the facts and follow the evidence wherever it leads and come to a conclusion," she states during an interview on that Sunday. However, on this date, the AG holds a secret meeting with ex-President Bill Clinton on an airport tarmac. The meeting raised huge questions about whether the independence of the Justice Department, which was conducting the investigation of Hillary Clinton's private email server, had been compromised.

•  July 2, 2016 -- Clinton meets with the FBI for a three-and-a-half hour interview as part of the investigation into her use of a private email server while leading the State Department. We now know the the conclusion of the interview was decided BEFORE it took place.

• July 5, 2016 -- FBI Director James Comey states that he would not recommend charges against Clinton for her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. However, Comey does note that Clinton and her aides were "extremely careless" handling classified information. The espionage Act is quite clear on this.

• July 6, 2016 -- AG Lynch makes it official that Clinton will not be charged for her use of a personal email server during her tenure as secretary of state. There is much outrage on this pass given Clinton for this obvious violation of the act.

• July 7, 2016 -- FBI director Comey testifies before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee. It doesn't go well. The same day, the State Department reopens its investigation into Clinton's use of a private email server.   
  
  

      At this point damage control goes into overdrive in the attempt to save their presidential shoe-in. Clinton goes on Fox News for an interview. Clinton defends her use of a private email server. She states, "FBI Director James Comey said my answers were truthful, and what I've said is consistent with what I have told the American people, that there were decisions discussed and made to classify retroactively certain of the emails." Even the left-leaning Washington Post Fact Checkers give her their lowest rating, four Pinocchios,(meaning a lie) for this statement.

•  August 18, 2016 -- A New York Times report reveals that Clinton told the FBI that Colin Powell recommended that she use a private email server during her tenure as secretary of state.  Two days later Powell responds to the allegations that he gave Clinton the idea to use a private email account. Calling it a lie, Powell says, "Her people are trying to pin it on me."

• September 2, 2016 -- With still much uproar over the pass given to Clinton, the FBI releases its report on the Clinton email investigation.

• September 13, 2016 --Bryan Pagliano, the former State Department staffer who was involved in setting up and maintaining Clinton's private email server, refuses to appear at a hearing before the House Oversight Committee.

• September 22, 2016 -- Members of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee vote to hold Pagliano in contempt for failing to appear at a hearing.

• September 23, 2016 -- It is revealed that Cheryl Mills, Clinton's chief of staff and adviser at the State Department, was given a limited immunity deal by the FBI during its investigation of Clinton's private email server. The same day, the FBI releases nearly 200 pages of notes from its investigation of Clinton's private email server. These contain even more evidence of violation of the act.

• October 28, 2016 -- In a letter to Congress, Comey says the FBI is reviewing more new emails related to Clinton's time as secretary of state, according to a letter sent to eight congressional committee chairmen. The emails are discovered as part of an investigation into Anthony Weiner and were sent or received by Clinton aide Abedin.

• November 6, 2016 -- Based on a review of the newly discovered emails, Comey tells lawmakers, two days before the election, that the agency has not changed its opinion that Clinton should not face criminal charges. 

 Conclusion:

      It is obvious that Hillary Clinton, whether involuntary or not, violated the Espionage Act. Now, after three years, we now know that Barrack Obama, though his own correspondence, knew of this illegality and helped to cover it up. Also a violation of the Espionage Act.

     The American public has, for three years, witnessed the elite and the deep state by all means to attempt to get our elected President out of office as to put an end to this matter. This this so-called impeachment, this  political theater that Americans are being subjected to is a last ditch effort to put an end to current A.G. Barr's now criminal investigation into the matter. We seriously doubt that Clinton and Obama will ever be arrested or face charges as the damage to the country would be unacceptable. 

      Full blown damage control is now at hand. This morning's survey shows the media negative bias at 90-96%. The elite that control our press  are running scared. As truth emerges, they no longer have complete control over the narrative. They don't know where the chips will fall as the A.G.'s initial report is days away from release and there is a real danger to their precious politicians and to what's left of their reputation as a "free press." They also know that American Patriots are waking up and the elite are running scared
 

 

Involuntary Treason is Still Treason Under the Law - Part 1

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      The greatest scandal in American history is unfolding, or not, before our eyes. The so-called impeachment is the latest smoke screen by a desperate coalition of party loyalists and anti-constitutionals to fundamentally change America. The Russian connection, that they paid for, has turned out to be what is was – false and they are losing control of the narrative as the Justice Department’s criminal investigation into the previous administration continues. They appear solemnly in front of cameras daily as their “secret investigation” leaks continuously from one direction. The American Constitutionalist will continue to print the facts – the truth, as difficult as it can be to differentiate from the smoke, mirrors, and outright lies being fed to the American people on a daily basis. Let’s get to it.

      Whether voluntary or involuntary the Espionage Act does not differentiate. It states, "Whoever...having lawful possession or control of any… document relating to national defense…(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from it’s proper place of custody… shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years or both."

The Timeline

• 2008 – Soon after the election an illegal off-site server used for clintonemail.com is registered under the name Eric Hoteham. This is presumably a misspelling of Eric Hothem, the name of a former Clinton aide.

• January 13, 2009 -- The domain clintonemail.com is registered in the name of longtime adviser to former President Bill Clinton, Justin Cooper. Hillary Clinton's email is set up as hdr22@clintonemail.com

     

     Government employees are allowed to use private emails for government work. However, this practice is strongly discouraged. If using a private email, "the agency must ensure that federal records sent or received on such systems are preserved in the appropriate agency record-keeping system." The National Archives and Records Administration states that personal email can only be used in "emergency situations" and that emails from personal accounts should be captured and managed (stored, preserved, and protected) in accordance with agency record-keeping practices. The State Department requests that all former secretaries of state "submit any records in their possession for proper preservation."

• November 2012 -- Clinton's private email server was redesigned to use Google as the backup server.

• December 13, 2012 -- Congressional investigators ask Clinton if she uses a personal email as information has surfaced that a Romanian hacker called "Guccifer" had possession of emails from this account. Clinton changes her email address.

• July 2013 – Suspecting multiple hacks Clinton's email server is changed once again.

• March 3, 2015 – With reports of another hack and classified information being leaked, State Department spokeswoman Maria Harf says: "[There's] no indication that Secretary Clinton used her personal email account for anything but unclassified purposes ... While Secretary Clinton did not have a classified email system, she did have multiple other ways of communicating in a classified manner, including assistants printing documents for her, secure phone calls and secure video conferences."

• March 4, 2015 -- The House committee investigating the 2012 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, issues a subpoena for Clinton's Libya-related emails. After 48 hours of silence, Clinton tweets: "I asked State to release them. They said they will review them for release as soon as possible."

• March 5, 2015 -- It is revealed that Clinton isn't publicly registered as the owner of the domain and server used to operate her personal email. This makes it more difficult to trace the account back to her. Accounts were registered in her aides' names, and she used a proxy company to shield her involvement.

• March 6, 2015 -- The State Department begins reviewing emails to determine what can be publicly released, not whether Clinton violated the law. (Espionage Act) Refusing to co-operate with the Congressional investigation, Clinton wouldn't disclose how her emails were encrypted. Her reasoning was, "given what people with ill intentions can do with such information in this day and age, there are concerns about broadcasting specific technical details about past and current practices."

• March 27, 2015 -- Rep. Trey Gowdy makes the statement, "Secretary Clinton unilaterally decided to wipe her server clean and permanently delete all emails from her personal server," during a Congressional investigation. This is a possible violation of the law. Clinton's lawyer responds in a letter that she "has maintained and preserved copies" of work-related or potentially work-related emails that were turned over to the State Department late in 2014. The lawyer, David Kendall, also stated that federal law governing record retention requires that each federal employee individually decide what emails must be preserved.

• March 31, 2015 -- It is revealed that Clinton used both an iPad and a Blackberry for email, contradicting the statement she made on March 10 about not wanting to carry multiple devices.

• April 15, 2015 -- It is discovered that Clinton ignored questions from Congress in 2012 about her email.

• May 21, 2015 -- The government's chief records officer says more than 1,200 of the emails Clinton gave them were deemed to be personal and not part of the federal record, but in March, Clinton stated that these emails no longer existed as they were wiped.

• July 7, 2015 -- CNN's Brianna Keilar has an exclusive interview with Clinton. In response to being asked about deleting 33,000 emails while under investigation by a House panel, Clinton says other secretaries of state had done the same thing. Clinton also says she was never subpoenaed by the House.

• July 24, 2015 -- The inspector general for the intelligence community informs members of Congress that some materials from Clinton's emails contain classified information.

• July 26, 2015 -- Clinton says she did not send classified emails from her private server while she was secretary of state. "I am confident that I never sent nor received any information that was classified at the time it was sent and received," Clinton tells reporters in Winterset, Iowa.

• July 31, 2015 -- The State Department releases another batch of emails. This batch has been heavily redacted with sensitive information that needed to be kept from the public. This was NOT what she had been saying so on August 11, 2015 -- Clinton agrees to turn over her private email server and a thumb-drive backup to authorities and the intelligence community inspector general confirms that at least five emails have contained classified information.

• August 12, 2015 -- One of Clinton's lawyers confirms that the private server used to contain Clinton's emails from 2009-13 was turned over to the Justice Department. The server was previously wiped of data, but FBI officials are confident that the data from it will be able to be recovered. Law enforcement officials suspect that the examination will take months as BleachBit was used to erase data.

• August 17, 2015 -- Intelligence officials reviewing emails from the server have recommended that 305 documents be sent to other agencies for consultation. Clinton tells reporters, “I just said, over 1,200 of those emails have been deemed not work-related. Under the law, that decision is made by the official. I was the official. I made those decisions."

• August 26, 2015 -- At an event in Iowa, Clinton says, "My use of personal email was allowed by the State Department. It clearly wasn't the best choice. I should have used two emails -- one personal, one for work -- and I take responsibility for that decision." She also adds: "Well, I know people have raised questions about my email use as secretary of state, and I understand why. I get it." This is a change from her previous responses to questions about her email use.

• September 8, 2015 -- Hillary Clinton releases an apology and statement on her Facebook page about the email scandal: "I wanted you to hear this directly from me. Yes, I should have used two email addresses, one for personal matters and one for my work at the State Department. Not doing so was a mistake. I'm sorry about it, and I take full responsibility …"

• September 30, 2015 -- The State Department releases the latest batch of Clinton's emails. This batch contains 3,849 documents from mostly 2010 and 2011. There are 215 more documents in addition to a previous batch of 125 that have been retroactively upgraded to "classified" and were not made publicly available. That made 340 emails with classified information in them that were not categorized as such by the Clinton’s State Department. The new emails also show that there was worry about the use of private email inviting hackers.

• November 30, 2015 -- The latest and largest batch of Clinton's emails is released. This release contains more than 5,000 emails, and approximately 328 of those were retroactively classified which brought the total to 668. Also included with the emails is a chain at the center of Republican criticism of Clinton's handling of the 2012 attack on the US Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

2016

• January 7, 2016 -- Having not met its goal for the month of December, the State Department releases another batch of Clinton emails. The next group of emails to be released at the end of January is expected to be the last.

• January 14, 2016 -- In a letter to congressional intelligence committees, Intelligence Community Inspector General I. Charles McCullough III writes that emails on Clinton's private server have been flagged for classified information, some of which is considered the highest "top secret" level of classification.

• January 20, 2016 -- During a segment on National Public Radio, Clinton says the letter from the inspector general was nothing more than a ruse to damage her campaign for the presidency. Clinton's spokesman, Brian Fallon, also tells Bloomberg that they believed McCullough and Republican senators were working together to make the letter public.

• January 22, 2016 -- Due to inclement weather, the State Department asks for a one-month extension to release Clinton's remaining emails. January 29 is the original deadline set by the courts for releasing all of the emails on Clinton's private server.

• January 29, 2016 -- The State Department releases the second-to-last batch of emails from Clinton's private server. The State Department also announces that 22 emails would not be released due to their containing "top secret" information.

• February 4, 2016 -- During a State Department review of the past five secretaries' of state emailing practices, it is revealed that former secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice had received emails containing classified information through personal email accounts. The State Department found that Powell received two emails that are now deemed classified and that Rice and her staff received 10 emails. Minor mistakes in classification but nothing like the volume under Secretary of State Clinton.

• February 13, 2016 -- The State Department releases 551 of Hillary Clinton's emails. Of those, 84 emails were redacted and deemed classified bringing the total to 752.

• February 19, 2016 -- A batch of 562 emails are released ahead of the Nevada caucuses. Of those, 64 emails were upgraded to "confidential" and heavily redacted.

• February 23, 2016 -- U.S. District Judge Emmet Sullivan considers ordering subpoenas of Clinton and aide Huma Abedin, but he ultimately decides to wait and rule in favor of discovery.

• February 26, 2016 -- The State Department releases 881 emails, approximately 1,500 pages, of the remaining emails. As of this release, 1,840 emails have been retroactively upgraded to classified.

• February 29, 2016 -- The State Department releases the final batch of Clinton's emails. In total, more than 52,000 pages of emails have been reviewed with 2,101 being retroactively classified and 22 being upgraded to top secret. One of the final unclassified emails is being withheld from the public at the request of law enforcement.

      This is the greatest scandal in our country’s history and every true American should be outraged and also frightened in the way it is being swept away and the truth hidden by powerful forces within and without of our nation. In these next few months the future of the United States hangs in the balance. Will we survive whole? Will we break apart or will the Founders vision be extinguished for an attempt at a Socialist utopia which we know will fail? The Timeline continues with our next installment.

Treason - Stopping an Investigation by Use of Impeachment

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      Are we witnessing the end of America as we have known it? Will our country break apart into separate entities on one side by Constitutional originalists and on the other by those who believe that the constitution changes with societal norms of the day over-riding rule of law? Will we become a Socialist country, this condition unrecognized by it’s citizens as it will be wrapped up in red, white, and blue? A Trojan horse appearing to be a democracy yet Communist at it’s core? Let us begin just to touch on some key points.

                                                           

                                                 TREASON

"Whoever...having lawful possession or control of any… document relating to national defense…(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from it’s proper place of custody…or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from it’s proper place of custody... and fails to make prompt report of such loss….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years or both."

                                                           THE UNDISPUTED FACTS

• Hillary Clinton set up an unauthorized computer server outside of the government.

• Mail containing sensitive classified information was transmitted through this server.

• The server was hacked by foreign governments and individuals then publicized and an “investigation” occurred which concluded, “Although we did not find clear evidence that Secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive, highly classified information.”

"Whoever...having lawful possession or control of any… document relating to national defense…(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from it’s proper place of custody."

• Mr. Obama knew (as e-mails have verified) that this had and was happening and used his office to cover up and downplay the seriousness of it.

"...or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from it’s proper place of custody... and fails to make prompt report of such loss….shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years or both."

 

                                                         THE COVER-UP

• Secretary of State Clinton’s associates were ordered to smash cell phones and wipe hard drives with BleachBit to obliterate evidence which included election interference, attempting and paying to get dirt on her Republican opponent, with the help of foreign entities. 

• Bill Clinton’s secret tarmac meeting with then Attorney General Loretta Lynch just days before Hillary Clinton was to be interviewed by the FBI about her mishandling of classified emails. As pressure was mounting about the premature ending of the FBI’s e-mail investigation. Comey claimed it wasn’t intentional but the law states “gross negligence” IS the criteria.

      The administration was confident that the election was in the bag and the situation could be lost in time after the inauguration of President Hillary Clinton. Then, the seemingly impossible happened – Donald Trump won the election. Panic ensued as the possibility that top officials in their administration, could be arrested and charged with espionage!

                                                                   DAMAGE CONTROL

      The morning after the election results were in the attacks on President-elect Trump began. Many players were involved to certain degrees in this crime and there was much to lose. Pre-inaugural assassination was briefly on the table as it was deemed that serious but this was quickly dismissed as too radical at this time. The players came to the conclusion that Mr. Trump’s personal history and temperament, with the help of the pro-Obama media would wear on the American people and of course there was the Russia investigation which surly would end his presidency. In addition, they still had co-operation of the FBI and the Justice Department.

      The Russia investigation went on for over two years and the conclusion could be spun but not lied about. It was a dead end from the beginning because it was not true. The story had been spun and twisted to cover-up more damning information, that the Clinton campaign and the Democratic party have been trying to dig up dirt on President Trump in Ukraine, Italy, and around the world before, during, and after the election to stop any further inquiry.

      Recently the smoke and mirrors have been put into overdrive. The Russian collusion story is out and impeachment is in. It is not a normal impeachment. It is being done in private in an extraordinary, one-sided, biased exhibition. The race is on to stop the new Attorney General and Justice Department from finding the truth. Getting President Trump out is the only way to replace these officials and stop the investigation. It is even more imperative that it happen as the Justice department has now stated that their inquiry is now a criminal investigation! This may well be the largest political scandal the county’s history and the future of America depends on it. The race for the truth is on Patriots. Will America win?