He Spoke the Truth - They Murdered the President

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      What people don’t understand is that terrorism can be used as a tool to steer people in certain directions. It is happening today as the Shadow Government of the U.S. put forth the faux premise of a white supremacy terrorism to get the citizenry to give up some of their constitutional freedoms and move towards Socialism. It is also also happening in Eastern Europe, this so-called terrorism from Russia. In Ukraine where the US is at war with Russia, although undeclared and fought by proxies, for the enhancement of western elite. The so-called terrorism is Russia, seeing it’s citizens in Ukraine being systematically discriminated and eliminated from their eastern provinces, have moved in to rescue and remove it’s peoples facing the wrath of the U.S. which is pulling the rest of Europe down into it by the pocketbook.

      In the early sixties, a new president bumped heads with that emerging un-elected menace. The government and it’s decision making was not in control of those

elected to serve. The President saw this as a great threat and consulted with former President Eisenhower. The Generals farewell speech spoke of this as an evil within the country that needed to be eradicated. Less than a week later the President attempted to inform the public via the media however he did not realize that the Deep State already had their agents in place in most of the major media outlets. (See: Operation Mockingbird.) For this reason stories of the speech were not widely spoken of. A few years after this speech, the President  saw that the situation was worsening. He put his foot down and started firing those at the top who were involved in an attempt to take back the country from those who would subvert it. Within a number of days they arranged his assassination and blew his head off in Dallas, and making it very clear to his predecessor who was in command.

      Let us on this fifty-ninth anniversary of his murder re-live that speech he gave to the American Newspaper Publishers Association on April 27, 1961. He knew then what we know now. In his address, John F. Kennedy talked about 'a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy' that rules our country and the western world. That speech was apparently the one that sealed his fate. Here is the Selected Transcript of John F. Kennedy's Address before the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961:

      "The very word "secrecy" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.

      Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control.

      And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.

      For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence--on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.

      It is a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific and political operations.

      Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.

       Without debate, without criticism, no Administration and no country can succeed-- and no republic can survive. That is why the Athenian lawmaker Solon decreed it a crime for any citizen to shrink from controversy.

      And that is why our press was protected by the First (emphasized) Amendment-- the only business in America specifically protected by the Constitution-- not primarily to amuse and entertain, not to emphasize the trivial and sentimental, not to simply "give the public what it wants"--but to inform, to arouse, to reflect, to state our dangers and our opportunities, to indicate our crises and our choices, to lead, mold educate and sometimes even anger public opinion.

      This means greater coverage and analysis of international news-- for it is no longer far away and foreign but close at hand and local. It means greater attention to improved understanding of the news as well as improved transmission. And it means, finally, that government at all levels, must meet its obligation to provide you with the fullest possible information outside the narrowest limits of national security...

      And so it is to the printing press--to the recorder of mans deeds, the keeper of his conscience, the courier of his news-- that we look for strength and assistance, confident that with your help man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”

Election Integrity, Free Speech, and Election Fraud

 by

       George Sontag

      As has been widely reported, the DOJ is currently issuing subpoenas to individuals who have dared to question the 2020 election results, NOT the many who questioned the 2016 election, no, this is weaponized attack by the shadow government on a political party. It was Democrats who challenged the presidential election results in 2000, 2004, and 2016 and nothing happened..

      There is a history of Democratic Socialist questioning and interfering with elections. In 2000, 15 House Democrats objected to counting Florida’s electoral votes. Several members of Congress called the 2000 election “fraudulent,” and Texas Representative Eddie Bernice Johnson vowed that there would be “no peace” because of the allegedly stolen election. (Violence and Election denial.)

      In 2004, Democrats in Congress forced a vote to recess the joint session of Congress counting electoral votes in order to debate perceived election irregularities in Ohio. Thirty-one House Democrats voted to reject Ohio’s electoral votes and were applauded for doing so by Illinois Senator Dick Durbin, among others. (Throwing out Electoral College votes)

      In 2016, several Democrats objected to the certification of Trump electors based on “overwhelming evidence of Russian interference” in the election. The FACTS NOW ARE INDISPUTABLE that the Democratic National Committee, along with their candidate, Hillary Clinton, paid for false documents in order to tip the election in their favor. Fines have been issued and paid by the Clinton organization, yet…...no DOJ action was taken.

      This is occurring against the backdrop of President Biden’s vendetta against what he calls “ultra MAGA Republicans,” a term completely made up by the left. This is the type of behavior you’d expect in a third-world dictatorship.

      What has changed now, is the politicization of the Justice Department. The 2020 election was rampant with reports of irregularities and fraud. States had the right to take appropriate steps to increase the security of their elections in the wake of these proven reports. Constitution’s elections clause—Article I, Section 4, Clause 1—gives states the primary duty of regulating the time, places, and manner of elections for federal office, and yet, from its first days, the Biden administration has been bent on waging an intimidation campaign against states attempting to bolster election integrity.

      President Biden denounced these reforms as “Jim Crow 2.0.” The DOJ sued Georgia to block the new law and issued two new guidance documents intended to put states including Georgia on notice of potential violations of federal election laws. It has used similar tactics in Arizona and Texas. Included in the DOJ’s crosshairs are those who participated in the political process as alternate electors; those in Congress who voted against certifying the election results and those who have raised funds from donors with a promise to investigate and challenge election fraud.

      We now have had the 2022 vote. So-called “breakdown” in the electronic voting system, which is ripe with fraud, and again, massive, late, unreliable mail-in ballots. Double digit leads for the other party evaporated into single digit losses - overnight. How? Thousands Democrat operatives  execute the DNC's ballot harvesting program, by collecting millions of the absentee ballots from non-voting immigrants and criminals, and illegally submitting them as being votes cast legitimate voters. Why do you think they are so against voter ID? We are one of the only countries in the world that don't demand voter ID.

 

MAIL IN VOTING IS FRAUD WAITING TO HAPPEN. 

MOST OTHER COUNTRIES UNDERSTAND THIS. 

THAT’S WHY THEY DON’T ALLOW IT. 

      But here, in the states that were united, the Left’s massive flow of media propaganda, which even reached European countries, has made fools of the voters. Their slogan “We must save our democracy” was shouted from every media outlet. Problem is –

WE ARE NOT A DEMOCRACY.

     

      A vote towards that end was a vote against, America, against the Constitution, and a step towards Democratic Corporate Socialism. One day after the vote and the states that were united, nothing has really changed. Comrades that voted Democrat, enjoy the hand-basket ride.

The End of the Republic

by

        M. Richard Maxson

      The events of 9/11 will most likely be remembered by future historians as the end of the Republic. First the terrorists attacked us—and then, in the name of national security, we began to attack ourselves. We enacted The Patriot Act, a dagger to the heart of the Constitution in a country where it was already struggling for breath. Ever since Congress, on a fully bipartisan basis, enacted the Patriot Act six weeks after the attacks on 9/11, we have lived in a surveillance state where the Constitutional guarantees are over-ridden in the name of national security. This special, unconstitutional law designed for an apparent emergency, has become a permanent addition. The government’s technology now monitor all of our electronic devices, listen to our phone calls, and read our emails and text messages. Secret courts that do the bidding of those who have agendas that would not be legal in a proper court. Once-rare applications for surveillance warrants to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court have multiplied many times in relative peacetime and have almost nothing to do with combating terrorism. It does have to do with Deep State politics.

      The Patriot Act was supposedly designed to fight the unique problem of terrorism. It quickly morphed into a mechanism by which the state keeps constant tabs on law-abiding Americans with different political views other than their own and those who ask the wrong kinds of questions about what is actually happening in public.

      What we have is a surveillance state controlled by the national security crowd pandering to the wishes of the un-elected elite and when you couple that with an executive branch willing to weaponize its mountains of information against its perceived political enemies, and the country has got a frightening problem it’s our hands. Act contrary to those in power and have your life disrupted forever...or worse. If you are passionate about the Constitution and the Bill of Rights, I believe there is no higher priority than addressing this danger.

      Throughout human history, the deterioration of freedom has been accompanied by oppression, corruption and enslavement. The suggestion to curtail some freedoms in the name of “saving our democracy”, is reminiscent of tyrants such as Stalin, Hitler and Mao. It doesn't matter what rights you have under the Constitution of the United States, if the government can punish you for exercising those rights such as having an opposing view. And it doesn't matter what limits the Constitution puts on government officials' power, if they can exceed those limits without any adverse consequences.

       The Constitution cannot protect you, if you don't protect the Constitution with your votes against anyone who violates it. Those government officials who want more power are not going to stop unless they get stopped. As long as millions of Americans vote on the basis of who gives them free stuff, look for their freedom -- and all our freedom -- to be eroded away, bit by bit. Our children and grandchildren may yet come to see the Constitution as just some quaint words from the past that people once took seriously. Some of yours already do.