The Coming War in Europe - Part Two

by

       Phillip Todd

      In attempting to write part two of the impending war in Europe, I was going to discuss many things about Ukraine. One is the corruption that has gone on since the nineties by the western elites after the fall of the Soviet Union. Then the big one, the fact that over half of their army are avowed NAZIs (See National Geographic “Trafficked, White Supremacy) and the absolute paranoia of Russia towards all NAZIs. It feel is unnecessary for a new article as all the facts have been ststed here at The American Constitutionalist over 6 years ago! Here are the stories and their links.

                                                             The "Nazification" of Ukraine

       "The Svoboda party has tapped into Nazi symbolism including the "wolf's angel" rune, which resembles a swastika and was worn by members of the Waffen-SS, a panzer division that was declared a criminal organization at Nuremberg."

https://thetheamericanconstitutionalist.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-nazification-of-ukraine.html

 

                                                     Why Ukraine? - Why Now? 

       "In Ukraine there are currently two different "armies." There are the Ukrainian regulars, who are inept at best and then there are the "special units." These divisions operate as they see fit with one goal in mind and that is to eliminate all Russian speaking peoples from eastern Ukraine by any means."

https://thetheamericanconstitutionalist.blogspot.com/2015/04/part-3-why-ukraine-why-now-by.html 

 

          Ukranians Speak About the War, the Media, and America

       "Since February 2015, millions of peaceful people are living in hell in eastern Ukraine while the national government starves, freezes and murders them because it benefits the New World Order. There is a co-ordinated effort in western media to suppress the truth of what is going on there."

https://thetheamericanconstitutionalist.blogspot.com/2018/03/ukranians-speak-about-war-media-and.html

 

                    Germany Not Fooled by US Lies about Ukraine

       Der Spiegel said. “False claims and exaggerated accounts, warned a top German official during a recent meeting on Ukraine, have put NATO – and by extension, the entire West – in danger of losing its credibility,” 

https://thetheamericanconstitutionalist.blogspot.com/2015/03/germany-not-fooled-by-us-lies-about.html 

 

Europeans, Russians, and Americans Speak Out About the Elitist's Plan for WWIII

       From the expansion of NATO eastward to the coup in Ukraine the encirclement campaign is charging ahead and the threat of a limited nuclear war is not a detriment to their cause. The elite now feel that is not only survivable but an acceptable consequence.

https://thetheamericanconstitutionalist.blogspot.com/2017/03/europeans-russians-and-americans-speak.html 

 

       Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesman said on Sunday that Russia began its military buildup along the Ukrainian border because it could no longer "tolerate" NATO's eastward expansion and "gradual invasion" of Ukraine. "When Germany was reunited and when the then-Soviet Union and the Soviet Union leader Mr. [Mikhail] Gorbachev said OK to that, there was a promise by American side not to expand NATO," Peskov said on Sunday. It was a gentleman's agreement which Russia accepted. "Unfortunately, not fixed in a juridical, in a legally binding guaranteeing document, but it — there was a guarantee that NATO would never ... expand its military infrastructure or political infrastructure eastwards," he continued.

      They lied, "the opposite thing started to happen since then, and NATO's military infrastructure started to get closer and closer to the borders of the Russian Federation," he added, saying that recent actions of installing troops and building a Ukraine arms factory have implied that actions speak louder than words. "At first, they were just words, but with the time being, we have seen the gradual invasion of NATO into Ukrainian territory, with its infrastructure, with its instructors, with supplies of defensive and offensive weapons, teaching Ukrainian military, and so on and so forth. The U.S. military have led Russia to feel that its national security is being "endangered." NATO is a "weapon of confrontation" rather than a "dove of peace," Peskov, a career diplomat and longtime Putin spokesman, stated and that brought us to the red line. That brought us to the situation when we — when we couldn't tolerate it anymore."

 

 

 

 

The Coming War in Europe - Part One

by

 

        Phillip Todd

• "War [with the U.S.] is inevitable.” - Margarita Simonyan, editor in chief of the state-funded Russian media outlets RT and Sputnik. 

To understand why war is coming you must understand the Russians. They lost an enormous amount of citizens fighting the NAZIs alone for most of the war. A whole generation of males were lost to Hitler. They hate and fear Nazis to this day. Their country was invaded multiple times in the twentieth century including by America. Is it any wonder paranoia is in their psyche? Then there are the lies from the west.

      Mikhail Gorbachev, at the end of the Cold War, reportedly told U.S. Secretary of State James Baker that Russia would agree to unification of East and West Germany if the U.S. would guarantee that NATO would not be moved further east. Baker is said to have told Gorbachev, "Not one inch." Since then fourteen nations have been admitted to NATO, and thus received U.S. war guarantees, after 1991, to defend them against…..Russia. The NATO line has been moved right to their borders and the west has installed weaponry aimed at…..Russia. That makes 29 nations, stretching far into Eastern Europe and represents an expansion of U.S. war commitments riskier in ways than the original creation of NATO, when we were obligated to defend 10 nations of Western Europe. Still, further NATO expansion may be in the cards. Georgia and Ukraine are looking to join NATO and have the U.S. thereby obligated to fight Russia in their defense. Two other nations, Sweden and Finland, are talking of abandoning their traditional neutrality for NATO membership and U.S. war guarantees.

      Presidents Harry Truman, Dwight Eisenhower, John F. Kennedy, Lyndon B. Johnson, Richard Nixon, Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan did agree on this: U.S.-NATO war guarantees stopped at the Elbe. Beyond the river in Germany, we battled the USSR with weapons of diplomacy, politics and economics, not weapons of war. But that hasn’t happened.

•  "Now they’re saying that they will have Ukraine as well. This means they will deploy their weapons there, even if it's not officially part of NATO,” he went on. According to the Russian leader, it is now up to the US-led bloc to come up with guarantees “immediately,” instead of continuously talking about it “for decades.” - V. Putin

        At a meeting with high-ranking military officers, Putin warned that stationing rockets in Ukraine would allow NATO to reduce “their flight time to Moscow to seven-to-ten minutes, and if hypersonic weapons are deployed, to just five.” Russia has warned it will take steps to defend its territory from the perceived threat.

•        "What would Americans do if we went to Canada and Mexico and deployed missiles there?" V. Putin

      How would we have reacted if, after losing the Cold War, we were treated to Russian warships on Lake Ontario and Moscow giving Canada war guarantees? Can we not understand why a Russian nationalist like Vladimir Putin would feel his country was being corralled and imperiled, if a NATO alliance created to contain Russia had lately added 14 members, most of which were former allies or republics of the USSR? As the New York Times editorialized:"Mr. Putin's concerns cannot be entirely dismissed. Were Ukraine to join NATO, the alliance would then have a 1,200-mile land border with Russia, a situation no major power would abide, no matter how loudly the Atlantic alliance claims to be purely defensive."

      Do we believe Putin will indefinitely accept the encirclement and containment of his country by nations united in an alliance created to keep Russia surrounded? With NATO's continuous post-Cold War expansion into Central and Eastern Europe, America has to ask: If the risk of war with Russia grows with each new member on its borders admitted to NATO, why are we doing this? Is there no red line of Putin's Russia we will not cross? When this war begins, the fault will lie with the West.