by
Phillip Todd*
President(?) Joe Biden’s understanding of the world appears to be based on the same sort of self-deceiving narratives as his concept of the US, if his solo press conference following the Geneva summit is anything to go by. “As usual, folks, they gave me a list of the people I'm going to call on,” Biden admitted at the start, “they” being the White House staff, presumably. Parsing Biden’s words is a thankless task, because whatever he actually says, his White House handlers and the compliant media will quickly ‘clarify’ if it clashes with their narrative.
Biden’s preference for media-manufactured narratives – even when they clash with observable, proven facts – has been pretty conclusively established by now. He actually repeated one of them on Wednesday, claiming – falsely – that “literal criminals” at the US Capitol “killed” a police officer. The 'Capitol insurrection' narrative is what the ruling Democrats are currently leveraging to turn the power of the US security state against their political opponents.
There was a particularly surreal moment when Biden tried to argue that Putin is driven by desire to gain approval and standing in the eyes of the “world,” presumably referring to the US and its allies (or vassals). Reporters may not think it matters, Biden said, but he was “confident that it matters to him,” meaning Putin.
“How would it be if the United States were viewed by the rest of the world as interfering with the elections directly of other countries and everybody knew it? What would it be like if we engaged in activities that he engaged in? It diminishes the standing of a country,” he asked rhetorically.
Many people justifiably saw this as totally lacking in self-awareness. What does he mean, “if”? The US has literally been interfering in elections and toppling governments for decades, through military coups and color revolutions, some of which – such as Serbia and Ukraine, twice! – Biden was involved in himself. Yet few noticed Biden’s curious phrasing: it’s not about whether the US is actually doing these things or not, but whether it was “regarded around the world” as such. In other words, narratives over facts.
Another typical tactic of U.S. Left propaganda narratives is to accuse the other of things that are true of oneself. Whatever he may have said to Putin, Biden sent a very clear message to Russians during his press conference. In the early 1990s, he said, “Russia had an opportunity, that brief shining moment… to actually generate a democratic government” and “it failed.” Needless to say, actual Russians have a different recollection of that “shining moment” as one of rampant crime, oligarchy, pillaging, poverty, and humiliation at the hands of US ‘advisers’ propping up President Boris Yeltsin’s government – to the point of helping him, shall we say, “fortify” the 1996 election. “It’s hard to imagine having more direct control over a foreign country’s political system — short of a straight-up military occupation,” as Russian expat journalist Yasha Levine argued in his description of the U.S. involvment in the 1990s.
The element of Joe Biden that I have always found interesting is that it often feels like he says the quiet part of the progressive agenda out loud. He’s made several racially insensitive comments, each one more embarrassing than the last. Although I’m not convinced he’ll ever top asking black broadcaster Errol Barnett about taking a cocaine test after he asked then candidate Biden if he’d taken a cognitive test.
But when you think back to those comments, it shows what many progressives think about minorities, but dare not say. His sentiment of, "if you don’t vote for me, you ain’t black" seems to be pretty common on the Left. That somehow if you don’t vote for Democrats, you’re some sort of a race traitor. The same sentiment comes across with acting as if deportation is a major factor in Hispanic vaccine hesitancy. Why on Earth would a law-abiding Latino citizen be worried about deportation? Personally, I don’t have such a low opinion of the Latino community to think that they’re all cowering in fear of the INS.
This patrician soft bigotry is often grating for minorities in the United States, and these opinions are regularly cited by minority Americans who end up becoming Republican. The fact of the matter is that many Americans are sick and tired of having their intelligence insulted. Whether it’s speeches like these or attempting to shove critical race theory down people’s throats, ultimately there will be a backlash. Once it does happen, let’s hope it will be sudden, swift, and not something anyone predicted on the Left because for some reason they are convinced that they can pander to people forever.
*European views were observations from - Nebojsa Mali, a Serbian-American journalist, blogger and translator, who wrote a regular column for Antiwar.com from 2000 to 2015 and Norman Lewis, a writer, speaker and consultant on innovation and technology, was most recently a Director at PriceWaterhouseCoopers