The Bilderberger Meeting 2014 - Conclusion

by

       M. Richard Maxson

     Bilderberg, the annual gathering of the world’s most powerful politicians and business magnates, is clearly shaping global policies by positioning its favored politicians as world leaders, determining the timetables of military conflicts and influencing the economic policies of nearly every nation on the planet, impacting the lives of billions around the globe. They influence key decisions that affect all aspects of our lives including the price of gasoline, how the prices of stock and commodity markets will be manipulated, and even which countries will be attacked or invaded.The Bilderberg Group is pushing ahead with its anti-free market, state-corporate takeover designed to destroy independent nations as well as the individual in order to make the population dependent on a system controlled by the tiny elite well-represented at the conference.

      Besides modern-day king making, the Bilderberg Group also has tremendous influence in economics and geopolitical events.Politicians need corporate backing to win elections and corporations need politicians to write favorable laws. There is this “collaboration”  between business and politics has been in the open for a very long time. This is why it's critical to follow the most powerful group in the world

     The list of topics to be discussed fat the Bilderberg conference:

• Is the economic recovery sustainable?
More bailouts to prop up the Euro.
 
• Who will pay for the demographics?
Organizing more aggressive powers of tax collection
 
• Does privacy exist?
The Bilderbergers are also worried about the blowback from Edward Snowden's revelations about NSA spying. They are worried that American and especially European citizens will demand privacy protections that will impede the NSA's "total information awareness."  The Bilderbergers discussed strategies for defeating the privacy-rights advocates and continuing their progress towards a world in which everyone and everything is under total, permanent surveillance. They are currently undergoing a major transformation that will see it and other high profile networks merge under the banner of Google as the elite accelerates its plan to consolidate its technocratic agenda.  Bilderberg is merging with Google under the stewardship of Google CEO Eric Schmidt, a regular Bilderberg attendee. Behind the scenes Google is using such forums as proving grounds on which to form the consensus that shapes the globe. Google’s growing influence within both the British and American governments is also well documented. Google is clearly positioning itself to become a force more powerful than governments in controlling and monitoring people’s behavior across the globe through all manner of different means, from cars that drive themselves (and are constantly tracked by a centralized Google database), to Google Glass which is akin to having a Google microchip in your forehead.
                                                                                                                          

• How special is the relationship in intelligence sharing?

Keith Alexander, head of the NSA, the agency which also began using new collection methods in secret for months until the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court ruled them unconstitutional was in attendance at the Bilderberg Conference.

 • Big shifts in technology and jobs
The manufacturing revolution of 3D printing and ways to control it and prevent the democratization of production.
 
• The future of democracy and the middle class trap
No more middle class, no more democracy just Socialism. There might be manufactured crises and wars, centralized control over education (indoctrination) to train those chosen for specific roles, and possibly even a tax on all ‘world citizens.’
 
 China’s political and economic outlook
The gas deal between Russia and China have raised grave questions about whether the Bilderberg-led West can continue its world-domination scheme.
 
• The new architecture of the Middle East
The neoconservative architects of 9/11 and the 9/11 wars are disappointed that Obama refused to bomb Syria, attack Iran, and go to war with Russia over Crimea. They also believe that the US may have to attack China to prevent that nation's rise to world's leading superpower status.
 
• Ukraine
There are military chiefs briefing arms companies bosses - in private - about their hopes and dreams for Ukraine. But you've also got billionaire speculators and the heads of gigantic private equity funds listening in. These are the people who stand to make a killing out of knowing where and when the bombs are going to fall, how many and on whom.

• What next for Europe?

Recent elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes, an historic development, which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create. It means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble

elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes—an historic development which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create—means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17472#sthash.JJTPRKmA.dpuf

elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes—an historic development which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create—means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17472#sthash.JJTPRKmA.dpuf

elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes—an historic development which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create—means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17472#sthash.JJTPRKmA.dpuf

elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes—an historic development which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create—means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17472#sthash.JJTPRKmA.dpuf

elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes—an historic development which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create—means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17472#sthash.JJTPRKmA.dpuf

elections which seated nationalists and populists of various stripes—an historic development which poses a challenge to the European Union that the Bilderbergers helped create—means that the political and economic infrastructure that Bilderberg fostered for decades, and still religiously upholds, may be in trouble. - See more at: http://americanfreepress.net/?p=17472#sthash.JJTPRKmA.dpuf

• Climate change.
This is high on the Bilderberg agenda is the establishment of a new, huge UN bureaucracy on the environment, so the industrialists can reap immense profits from new technology to clean the world's air and water. "Nothing has changed from when that was written," the an official said. "By establishing an ecology commission, the United Nations further intrudes into the domestic affairs of nations, reducing their sovereignty piece by piece until there is none left." People suspicious of the elites call climate change a euphemism for the artificial deindustrialization of some nations, with the goal of keeping the global economy under the control of transnational corporations and the expense of potential hubs of economic growth.

       No matter how you look at the Bilderberg Group, it is eerily disturbing. Just the fact that a global power elite with representatives from politics, finance, and industry is meeting behind closed doors, in almost total secrecy on a regular basis, should be enough to cause concern and public outcry. The fact that they feel the need to control everything which occurs at these meetings, allow NO public attendance or reporting of any kind, and stay behind armed military guards seems suspicious to say the least. As more and more people become aware of their existence and possible explanations regarding their activities, the true desires and agenda of this influential group may come to light.

The Bilderberger Meeting 2014 - Part 1

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      The Bilderberg Group is a decades-old club for some of the world’s most influential individuals, politicians, officials, businessmen, academics and European royalty, regularly gathering to discuss global policy issues. Critics accuse them of acting as a shadow unelected government, would-be rulers of the world, which take decisions affecting billions of people behind closed doors, with little regard for the needs or wishes of the general population. Where will the next war be? Who will be elected as a head of state? Where can we make moves to cause conflict to make the most profit? All this was within their power to determine. These ARE the majority of the men who actually run the world.
 
      They are billionaire captains of industry who landed invitations include the heads of Shell, BP, Airbus, HSBC, Saab, AXA, Google, and Linkedin. They will sit alongside key global powerbrokers such as

Christine Lagarde, the head of the International Monetary Fund, and senior officials from the European Central Bank. It's a guest list that most conference organizers can only dream of, with attendees ranging from royalty to business leaders, spies to politicians. Make no mistake this isn't any conference – this is the Bilderberg conference, a top-secret annual gathering attracting the richest and most powerful people from across the globe. 120 of the world's richest and most powerful people meet behind closed doors and protected, not by the local police force, but by the military of the host country. The press, is not welcome.

  MORE: Full list of Bilderberg 2014 attendees

      Do we need proof that these people, not our elected officials, are the ones who decide the immediate future of mankind? They first need to control the more powerful countries. How do they do this, let's examine,

• The former Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair, came to power as the UK’s Leader of the Opposition one year after attending a Bilderberg meeting in 1993.
•  In 1991, the then governor of Arkansas, who was relatively unknown at the time, was invited to attend the Bilderberg meeting in Baden-Baden, Germany. Just over one year later the governor, William Jefferson Clinton, became the President of the United States.
• Democratic mayor of Atlanta, Kasim Reed, was invited for this year’s Bilderberg conference in Copenhagen.“He’s seen as one of the few legitimate Democratic candidates for higher office in Georgia,” a Republican strategist told Roll Call in 2012, adding that he will be a formidable adversary to the GOP. It would appear that Bilderberg is grooming him for just that.

       To truly realize the influence of the Bilderberg Group, it’s critical to look back at several of the world’s most significant events in the past several decades, which were not as random as they appear but were rather planned by design inside the eloquently-furnished meeting rooms of past Bilderberg conferences.

• In the early 2000s, late investigative journalist Jim Tucker correctly predicted that Operation Iraqi Freedom would commence in March 2003 and not in late 2002 as so many defense analysts were suggesting at the time. How did Tucker know? Because he wasn’t just guessing; sources inside Bilderberg told him.
• Daniel Estulin, author and public speaker on the Bilderburg group, correctly predicted the 2007 collapse of the housing bubble a year before it happened after receiving information from his own sources inside the Bilderberg Group.
• In 2009, Tucker predicted that Bilderberg would use the resulting economic slowdown to erode America’s national sovereignty. This is now coming to fruition through multiple ways, such as the Trans Pacific Partnership, which allows transnational mega-corporations to tighten their grip on individual countries such as the United States. 

      According to the Bilderberg Group’s official press release, members discussed several key topics this weekend while also asking the question, “Does privacy exist?” Given the fact that the architects of the modern surveillance state were among the attendees, the real question is, will Bilderberg end privacy as we know it? This years meeting focused on Internet Privacy, The  Rise of Nationalism, and Ukraine to name just a few. In part two of this report we will explore in more detail these and other topics that these rulers of the world are discussing.

The Military's Death Panel

by

       Zeno Potas

      They said they would never happen, but my niece is dead. We were told they would never exist, yet one sentenced my niece to die. I am speaking of the "Death Panel", the group of people who decide who gets the health care and who does not. Who will live and who will die. This one made a call, a huge mistake, but then, it was too late.

      My nephew was in the military. It was the first area where the Affordable Care Act was introduced. His wife was pregnant and delivered a healthy baby. After she got home there were problems. She was not doing well. In the military you go with the government doctors. While under their care for a number of months, she slowly deteriorated. They didn't seem to be helping her so the couple went to get a second opinion outside of the military. Private care was very expensive, too much for a soldier to afford, so it was back to the military doctors.

      One day, six months after the birth of her child, she was found unconscious on the floor of her bedroom. She had internal bleeding and had slipped into a coma. After examination my the military doctors her case was referred to the panel for them to make a decision on her care. Their verdict - unlikely to recover, maintain for now, talk to the family about terminating her life support. Further surgery was ruled out as "low chance of recovery". She had been sentenced to death!

      The family struggled with the decision to terminate. At the very least it was incompetence on the part of the military doctors. In the private section it could be called malpractice. Then a call came in, she was waking up! The family rushed to the hospital. She lay there, semi-comatose and doctors were rushing to get the authorization to take her to surgery. She passed before it came.

      There is no doubt in the family's mind that her death was unnecessary. The fact is that the panel decided not to help her, to withhold and ration treatment for another, was the cause of her death. In doing this they also were able to cover up the incompetence of the doctors that treated her. They are the"Death Panel", the ones who decide who lives and who dies. My niece was one of the first casualties of the ACA. One of the first deaths caused by, what is called, Obamacare. She was one of the first to die, but I guarantee she was not going to be the last.

Socialism: No Longer a Dirty Word

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      The election of people who declare that they are Socialists to public office is starting to snowball. The recent election of Kshama Sawant to Seattle City Council, Bill DeBlasio as Mayor of New York City, and

Bernie Sanders of Vermont, who says he may run for president, is representative of the direction the United States is going.

      Ms Sawant recent rally to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour drew many new converts to the cause. Their victories not only establishes a model for others to follow, it flies in the face of American wisdom which holds that no Communist candidate can win an election in the United States. Not only can these Progressives win, but they can win in the largest city in the country. This is a substantive change in U.S. politics. Is anyone paying attention or is this the nation's future?

      In Florida  Rep. Joe Garcia (D., Fla.) of Florida stated that “communism works"  "We’ve proved that communism works. If you give everybody a good government job, there is no crime,” Rep. Garcia said. This is the mindset of the Progressives, the Socialists, the Democrats. As much as they dance around any suggestion of this truth, it is a slip of the lip that occasionally shows their true colors, their anti-Constitutional, anti traditional American agenda. They wave the flag to hide behind, but the truth is nothing of the kind.

      There are a lot of arguments about whether communism, socialism, and liberalism are the same thing.

What shouldn't be arguable is that they're all closely related branches of the same tree. We have seen this progression before with failed policies around the world. Winston Churchill described described what the Socialists in Britain had brought to that once-proud island. He stated that “Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings; socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.”

      Today, the government  -- the welfare and warfare states in which we Americans now live -- is comfortably in the hands of Progressives. With the exception of the Goldwater and early Reagan years, the leadership of both major political parties has been dominated by Progressives since WWII -- heavy progressives in the Democratic Party, now almost completely infected, and light progressives in the Republican Party, the "mainstream Republicans."  The Democrats in the Senate are loading up the federal courts with Socialist judges, who will be dismantling the rule of law and destroy the rights of the people, for decades after they are long gone from the Congress. The Senate's power to confirm or not confirm presidential nominees to the federal courts is the only thing that can prevent the Progressives from leaving that kind of toxic legacy in the federal courts, including the Supreme Court.

       We are at a crucial point in the history of America, and perhaps approaching a point of no return.  This year's elections and the 2016 presidential election may be among the most important elections in the history of this country, and can determine what kind of country this will be for years -- and even generations -- to come. We will choose whether to continue down the course of Democratic Socialism or try to reverse this back towards what the USA was once was.

     

What's Really Going on in Europe?

by

       Phillip Todd

       Addressing the Russian Federal Assembly Putin, as usual, had some choice words for the United States. "In the case of Ukraine, our Western partners have crossed the line," he told lawmakers. "Western partners, led by the United States, prefer not to be guided by international law in their practical policies, but by the rule of the gun. ... They have come to believe in their exceptionalism and their sense of being the chosen ones. That they can decide the destiny of the world, that it is only them who can be right. It is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation," Putin stated. "There are big countries and small countries, rich and poor, those with long democratic traditions and those still finding their way to democracy. Their policies differ, too," he wrote. "We are all different, but when we ask for the Lord's blessings, we must not forget that God created us equal."

       Those are the words and thoughts of the Russian leader. Instead of finding common ground with Russia, the US continues to escalate tensions with inefficient sanctions and rhetoric while provocatively supporting the illegitimate CIA led Kiev government. This didn't have to happen if they had realized back in 1990 that they should create a new security organization, with no Warsaw pact and no NATO. Not without Russia, nor against Russia, but with Russia – a common security alliance.

      Let us look back at what has transpired. From 1989 to 1991, Mikhail Gorbachev agreed to let Eastern Europe go free and withdraw his troops and tank armies back to the Urals. The Soviet Union was allowed to dissolve into 15 nations. In three years, the USSR gave up an empire, a third of its territory, and half its people. It extended to us a hand of friendship. How did we respond? We pushed NATO right up to Russia's borders, bringing in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Rumania, Bulgaria, even former Soviet republics Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia. European objections alone prevented us from handing out NATO war guarantees to Ukraine and Georgia.

       To cut Moscow out of the Caspian Sea oil, we helped build a pipeline through two former Soviet republics, Azerbaijan and Georgia, and, thence, under the Black Sea to our NATO ally Turkey.In the Boris Yeltsin decade, the 1990s, George W. Bush sought to put an anti-missile system in Poland and the Czech Republic. Neither country had requested it. We said it was aimed at Iran.  U.S. hustlers are colluding with local oligarchs in looting Russia of her natural resources. You can't take riches from a nuclear power, but you can have them surrender them. The goal has always been to encircle Russia and bring it's to it's knees for the profit of the Democratic Socialist billionaires of the world.

      So how did we think he would react to U.S. encirclement of his country by NATO and U.S. meddling in his internal affairs? What did everyone expect when the US broke promises and expanded NATO to the East? Did they expect Russia would sit back and do nothing? Are the US and it's allies trying to start WW III? No, they want to pry their riches out of them. Why cannot we Americans see ourselves as others see us?

      The answer to that is very easy - American media propaganda. As it was in the old Soviet Union, so it now how it is in the West. The US public is bombarded with non-news and government propaganda. Half truths and outright lies furnished by rich Leftist Socialists, many of whom are not US citizens but control the media almost completely. Looking at the US today, Joseph Stalin would have been proud.

Todays Democratic Socialism

by

       George Sontag

         
     "Democratic control is therefore also essential to the meaning of socialism," - World Socialist Movement. Democratic socialism is a political ideology advocating a democratic political system alongside a socialist economic system. Democracy and socialism go hand in hand. All over the world, wherever the idea of democracy has taken root, the vision of socialism has taken root as well. The Founding Fathers knew this. That is why they set up the country as a Republic. They did all they could to avoid creating a democracy. For them, democracy meant mob rule and depotism. It is also, the first step towards Socialism.


      To get to Socialism you first have to go through another stage - Fascism. It doesn't have to be exactly as the definition suggests. You would have a leader who, in the eyes of the media, can do no wrong. Constitutional violations would be marginalized and spun to be inconsequential and the ruling elite would arbitrarily pick and choose which of the country's laws to enforce and by how much. The judicial systems judges would be appointed according to their political views especially their willingness to "change" the laws "to fit" a "modern world".

       What Socialism, Fascism and other ideologies of the left have in common is an assumption that some very wise people -- like themselves -- need to take decisions out of the hands of lesser people, like the rest of us, and impose those decisions by government fiat. The left's vision is not only a vision of the world, but also a vision of themselves, as superior beings pursuing superior ends. In the United States, however, this vision conflicts with a Constitution that begins, "We the People..." That is why the left has for more than a century been trying to get the Constitution's limitations on government loosened or evaded by judges' new interpretations, based on notions of "a living Constitution" that will take decisions out of the hands of "We the People," and transfer those decisions to our betters.

      To keep the average citizen confused and complacent they go by different names such as Progressives, Liberals, Socialists, or today, Democrats. They are the ones changing the country. These are "mainstream" liberals, who control the Democratic Party, the old media, the executive branch of the federal government, the U.S. Senate, the U.S. Supreme Court half the time, the mammoth federal bureaucracy, many state governments, our universities, our national educational establishment and other cultural institutions. Their Socialist mindset oozes intolerance for opposing viewpoints, and with their cultural bullying, they've effectively scared many non-liberals into silence using such tactics as "political correctness".

      This is the stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which collective ownership of the economy under the dictatorship of the ruling class has not yet been successfully achieved. We are, however, going down that road.  Unless the American people come to their senses and stop the "something for nothing" mindset and demand that the Constitution, as it is written, be respected, the end of this great Republic will come sooner than later.
      

The American Propaganda Machine

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      It is getting more difficult for me to watch the mainstream media news coverage without screaming"liar" into my television set every few minutes. There is so little of the whole truth being broadcast to our citizens it is frightening. There was a time when it wasn't so but that was when there was plenty of competition and control over the media was not so tight. Twenty years ago, thirty corporations controlled 90 percent of US media. Today, it is a grand total of six mega-corporations or four according to Dan Rather who claims that "big business is in bed with big government." This is how our country has morphed into the Capitalistic Socialistic form of government that we have today.

      Mr Rather, in an interview with Tom Green, was asked if he thought the American people are aware of

the collusion between the government and the networks?  He replied, "No, they don't realize that four to six big conglomerates own ALL the networks and control 80% or more of ALL news in the United States." He went on, "Big corporations give a lot of money to legislators to influence votes. They work together." The FCC changed the rules in the 1980's with deregulation and according to Rather. "Before that the networks had to meet certain requirements and broadcast what was in the public's interest. You had to give both sides a fair chance to speak but today the peoples airwaves are gone."

      You don't hear much international news any more from the major US outlets unless it is cold war rhetoric or other news that will sway the gullible citizens opinion to match that of their corporate masters. "The amount on international news the public sees is far less than in the past 50 to 75 years and the quality is the lowest of all," Rather stated. "It is much more difficult to get to the truth due to the volume of false information out there."

       "International and investigative news requires deep digging and it is the most expensive to fund that is one reason it is easier to show celebrity news than to go after a real story and report the true facts." So long as the information and opinions that reach the public are selected by mainstream media people, whom polls show to be overwhelmingly on the left, the left's view of the world prevails. "If you want the truth," Rather stated," you need to read more than one newspaper, watch more than one network, and read international news on another country's website. Only then can you have enough information to make a rational decision on what the reality of the situation is."  What happened to the watchdog media?  Will we ever get our nations media back to fair and balanced reporting on important issues? As Dan said, "You have a better chance of the Queen of Sheba riding through here on a hippo before we ever see that again."