Is It News or Propaganda?

by
     M. Richard Maxson

    The disgracefully slanted coverage of the trial of George Zimmerman, an EPA study that failed to link fracking with environmental contamination and a recent study by Justice Department concluding that gun control laws are ineffective in reducing gun violence is only the latest, prominent example of liberal media bias. Many Americans are experiencing despair over what we believe is the destruction of this nation from within led by the Liberal media. We see a rejection of the moral principles and system of government that have made this the greatest nation in the history of the world.

     Since the 2006 election, America’s national media hasn’t let up. It’s pushing harder on its pro-liberal Democrat, Socialist, anti-Constitutionalist Republican slant. They run stories that help Democrats hard and long. The media does not insist that Democratic politicians explain why they defy public opinion on extreme positions like late term abortion, partial birth abortion, or parental consent and stories that help Republicans, will be be ignored, or should be delivered quietly and, especially if they hurt the president.

     The Press today is based upon a manipulation of the truth, half-truths, a cynical representation of manipulated facts, screenshots, sound-bites video clips, and outright lies, to sway public opinion. The press doesn't listen and then ask questions about the results found, instead it asks questions and relentlessly quizes Republicans and Independants, eagerly hunting any gaffe that they can be discredited with. They attack the persons who have presented the creditable evidence that doesn't fit the liberal agenda.
   
      For most Americans, their entire informational and intellectual universe is shaped by the left -- from elementary school through graduate school, and of course, in the news media.  The non-political middle hears only stories shaped by the leftist media. They rarely, if ever, encounter non-left viewpoints. The media is nothing short of a corrupt PR arm for the Democratic/Socialist Party. The cynical, despicable thing about all this is that even though the public knows it’s being played by the liberals, the game still works.
      
     Average Americans might not trust the media, but the networks still set the agenda and control the subject. Sadder still is that few in the general public even seem to be taking notice of the loss of quality reporting across the state and nation. Walter Cronkite, the great news reporter, once remarked, “Freedom of the press is not just important to democracy; it is democracy,”


     We are the first to live in a total mass-media-oriented world, and every night when we turn on the television and the news comes on, we see the almost unbelievable hypocrisy and deceit and even outright idiocy of our national leaders and the corruption and disintegration of all our institutions, from the police and courts to the White House itself, and we are told is is alright. This is the norm. This is the Leftist media.

     The media in the United States, while still not completely controlled by the government, is mostly under the direction of large Liberal contributors which dictate the content of the newspapers, magazines, and TV networks they own, so except for small independent efforts it is no longer really free. In a democracy, we need journalists to hold the government accountable.  An independent, experienced and competent press is vital to governmental transparency – and a check on unfettered government power.

     Friedrich Hayek noted in his book, The Constitution of Liberty, that democracy only makes sense if individuals are able to form an opinion independent of their government.  That is the reason behind first amendment rights such as freedom of speech and freedom of the press, but as a rare moderate Democrat recently stated "America has no functioning democracy at this moment," - Jimmy Carter
   
     

Islam - I'm Tired of the Lies

by

    M. Richard Maxson

     

      How many more 9/11’s do we need before we wake up? How many more Bali bombings? How many more attempted beheadings? When will we wake up and realize that Islam is in fact a political ideology cult which has always been spread by the edge of the sword?

      “When will we believe the words of Muhammad? When will we believe the Koran? When will we believe the hadith? When will we take them at their word when they tell us they intend to kill us? When will we understand that they want to see the entire world under submission to Islam and sharia law?”

      On this anniversary of our nations greatest loss, when thousands of Muslims are preparing to march on Washington because of their perceived anti-religious indignities, I am reprinting a post that is a truth, a fact, that is staring us all in the face but is yet unrecongnized by the Western masses.

                                                       Islam is not a religion.

                                                                        It is a cult

    What is a religion? All religions are basically the same; do these things -- pray, penance, repent, be good to others, etc -- and earn your salvation. Christianity says your salvation has already been given and will not be lost as long as you practice the aforementioned. 

    There are some violent passages in these "holy books" of religion but nowhere does it say to murder, rape, lie, and degrade our fellow human beings as it does in Islamic texts. It says what it means. To say that a believer can pick and choose what parts of the Koran to adhere to is folly.

     To understand Islam one must understand the prophet Mohammad himself. His words and deeds. Mosab Hassan is the author of "Son of Hamas". His father was one of the founders of Hamas. Hassan says, "In order to know what Islam is all about we need to study and learn the behavior of Mohammad, the same in Christianity we need to study who Jesus is.

     In Islam's early days, Mohammed spread the faith with the sword. He was a murderer, a rapist, and a pedophile who showed no mercy to anyone who opposed him. This is made quite clear in the five Islamic holy books which details Islam. (see Craig Winn (teawithterrorists.com) and his soon-to-be-released manuscript, Prophet of Doom.)

   In the translated versions of the Koran and the Hadith (books of Mohammed's teachings) show the manuscripts to be riddled with exhortations to commit violence and terror against those who don't follow their doctrine. Peaceful Muslims are only deluding themselves by believing Islam is a religion of peace. The fact is that "According to Allah the most vile of creatures is a peace-loving Muslim," said author and Islamic terror expert Craig Winn "Muslims are the victims of Islam"

   The basic message of these Muslim fundamentalists is to "slay the infidels wherever you find them," which includes Christians and Jews, as well as Muslims who don't believe in the Jihad. "I came to the conclusion that this so-called religion, Islam, is poison." Winn believes it is essential to fully comprehend doctrines such as the Koran in order to understand the roots of terrorism.

The big problem is that the public is widely misled about Islam, thinking that it is a peaceable religion that was hijacked by a small segment of fundamentalists, when it is actually based on violent teachings. Winn puts forth that the western world must own up to the fact that "Islam is at war with us."

   When will this happen? After a "nuclear dirty bomb" is detonated in New York, or Washington, or Los Angles is probably the correct answer. there is too much political correctness in this country to allow the truth to shine through.

     I'm tired of being told that Islam is a "Religion of Peace," when every day I can read dozens of stories of Muslim men killing their sisters, wives and daughters for their family "honor", raping eight year old brides that do not survive the first night, of Muslims rioting over some slight offense; of Muslims murdering Christian and Jews because they aren't "believers"; of Muslims burning schools for girls; of Muslims stoning teenage rape victims to death for "adultery"; of Muslims mutilating the genitals of little girls; all in the name of Allah, because the Qur'an and Shari’a law tells them to.

     I'm tired of being told that out of "tolerance for other cultures" we must let Saudi Arabia use our oil money to fund mosques and mandrassa Islamic schools to preach hate in America and Canada , while no American nor Canadian group is allowed to fund a church, synagogue or religious school in Saudi Arabia to teach love and tolerance.

                                                                        I'm tired of the lies

The Powers of War

by M. Richard Maxson                                                              

     The president of the United States is also known as the Commander and Chief of the Army and Navy and has the powers to:
- Declare war, grant letters of marks and reprisal
- Call forth the Militia
- Provide and maintain a Navy
- Define and punish offenses against the law of nations
 - Raise and support armies
- Make rules for the government and regulation of [the armed forces]
- Make rules for captures on land and sea
- Define and punish piracies and felonies on the high seas
- Organize, arm and discipline the militia
- Exercise authority over building of forts, magazines, arsenals, dock-yards, and other needful buildings.

    If you agree with the above then you are compeltly WRONG. These are the powers given to the Congress, but most Americans, believing many powers assigned to Congress belong to the president.  The Framers gave only the Congress the authority – and duty – to make such decisions. James Madison observed, “In no part of the Constitution is more wisdom to be found than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department.”

    Recent Presidents have advanced an interpretation of Art. II that gives the “commander in chief” power over any and all issues that can be tied to the defense of the nation. In these arguments, so many actions are defined as under the president’s  limit of authority that the executive branch becomes an unlimited and unstoppable force. However, this misunderstanding about whether the constitution could be amended through the making of treaties was denied in the case of Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1957):  "This court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the constitution over a treaty" [Reid, at p. 17]. "No agreement with a foreign nation (no executive orders, no Presidential directives, no "accords" etc.) can confer power on Congress or any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the constitution" [Reid, supra].

      The current perversion of the Constitution is a lethal attack on our core value of divided government.  Constitutional powers are not subject to be “taken” from one branch by another. However Congress and the public now seem satisfied to let the president exercise this pilfered authority. The Framers intended that decisions regarding the use of military force were to be safely in the hands of Congress while the execution of those decisions were to be solely presidential. Today's Democratic Socialists have no regard for the Constitution or rule of law and have severely weakened it in many places, and as a result, our liberty, our prosperity and our very nation are in decline and in grave jeopardy.
    
    


 

Leftism - Part 2

By
  

       M. Richard Maxson
    

     Liberalism was once a philosophy based in Constitutional respect and American exceptionalism, but it’s been a long time since that was the case. Perhaps not since John Kennedy has there been a national Democrat who believed in this vision of America, one in which individual liberty and personal responsibility brought about collective greatness, not a partisan legislative agenda and the systematic silencing of dissent.
     The Democratic Party was infected by the progressive (Leftist) philosophy at the dawn of the 20^th century, as was the Republican Party and the world. Republicans largely rejected them, but they found a willing host with the Democrats. The concept sounds great – government can make things better. Soon, they had metastasized through the Democratic Party and won the White House with Woodrow Wilson. Wilson abused his power and sought to imprison opponents whose only crime was criticizing his administration. (On top of his rabid racism, another staple of the progressive movement no one likes to talk about.)
    The Leftist movement during the post WWII era tried again to gain control but were forced underground by the rabid Anti-Communism that had swept the country. The Cold War was upon us and only good Americans were required to fight this battle. The re-election of Harry Truman may have been the last election of a "true" Democrat. Some may say that it was John Kennedy and that topic is truly up for debate, but this was the time of the silent take-over of the Democratic Party (1946-1964).
    The election of 1960 brought huge numbers of Leftists into the party to fight the "establishment" Democrats behind a new younger leader, John F. Kennedy. Was Kennedy a Leftist? Far from it, but it was that huge influx of young Leftists into the party that sealed it's fate. Kennedy was not of their mindset but his campaign was a means to an end.
     The 1960s, became the decade liberals love to hate. Why? Because the path-breaking supply-side tax cuts of John F. Kennedy generated one of the greatest booms in economic history showing once again that left alone our system of economic freedom works!  Actually, it was two big tax cuts. The first was a business tax cut put in place in 1962, and the second was an across-the-board personal tax cut that began in early 1964. Kennedy cut the top tax rate from 91 percent to 70 percent, but all other tax rates were also reduced for top-to-bottom income earners. The result was an eight-year expansion from 1961 to 1969 saw growth of 48 percent -- a third more in an eight-year period than in the 16 years ending in 1960.
    Since that time, conveniently, John Kennedy’s powerful tax-cut slashing on business, individuals, and investors doesn’t exist in the Left’s post-war, economic narrative. It’s been rubbed out of history, replaced by a liberal vision of powerful unions and high tax rates on the rich, which is supposed to create growth.
     This was one of the most turbulent times in our nations history. War, riots in the street, and on our university campuses decided the election of 1968. Law and order and an end to the war won the day but something else was happening......... in our schools. Across the country the universities had a new generation of teachers who had other ideas of what the United States was going to be. Educating the masses in the ideology of the Left was the new way to power.
     The uprisings on our nations campuses was directly due to the anti-American ideals that were being ingrained from these new Leftist teachers into our youth to mold them for a new world. Reported as anti-war protests, when if fact, it was not only protests against the war but they were the beginning of anti-American protests from within our own country.
 

        America will never be destroyed from the outside.
                    If we falter and lose our freedoms, 
         it will be because we have destroyed ourselves.
                                                                                  - Abraham Lincoln



    
     

What America's Schools Should Be - An Announcement by the Principal

 

Guest Column  

By Dennis Prager 

To the students and faculty of our high school:

    I am your new principal, and honored to be so.
There is no greater calling than to teach young people.
I would like to apprise you of some important changes coming to our school. I am making these changes because I am convinced that most of the ideas that have dominated public education in America have worked against you, against your teachers and against our country.
 
First , this school will no longer honor race or ethnicity.
     I could not care less if your racial makeup is black, brown, red, yellow or white. I could not care less if your origins are African, Latin American, Asian or European, or if your ancestors arrived here on the Mayflower or on slave ships. The only identity I care about, the only one this school will recognize, is your individual identity -- your character, your scholarship, your humanity. The only national identity this school will care about is American.
    This is an American public school, and American public schools were created to make better Americans. If you wish to affirm an ethnic, racial or religious identity through school, you will have to go elsewhere. We will end all ethnicity, race and non-American nationality-based celebrations. They undermine the motto of America , one of its three central values -- epluribus Unum, "from many, one."  This school will be guided by America 's values. This includes all after-school clubs. I will not authorize clubs that divide students based on any identities. This includes race, language, religion, sexual orientation or whatever else may become in vogue in a society divided by political correctness.
    Your clubs will be based on interests and passions, not blood, ethnic, racial or other physically defined ties. Those clubs just cultivate narcissism -- an unhealthy preoccupation with the self -- while the purpose of education is to get you to think beyond yourself. So we will have clubs that transport you to the wonders and glories of art, music, astronomy, languages you do not already speak, carpentry and more. If the only extracurricular activities you can imagine being interested in are those based on ethnic, racial or sexual identity, that means that little outside of yourself really interests you.
 
Second , I am uninterested in whether English is your native language. My only interest in terms of language is that you leave this school speaking and writing English as fluently as possible. The English language has united America 's citizens for over 200 years, and it will unite us at this school. It is one of the indispensable reasons this country of immigrants has always come to be one country. And if you leave this school without excellent English language skills, I would be remiss in my duty to ensure that you will be prepared to successfully compete in the American job market. We will learn other languages here -- it is deplorable that most Americans only speak English -- but if you want classes taught in your native language rather than in English, this is not your school.
 
Third , because I regard learning as a sacred endeavor , everything in this school will reflect learning's elevated status. This means, among other things, that you and your teachers will dress accordingly. Many people in our society dress more formally for Hollywood events than for church or school. These people have their priorities backward. Therefore, there will be a formal dress code at this school.
 
Fourth , no obscene language will be tolerated anywhere on this school's property -- whether in class, in the hallways or at athletic events. If you can't speak without using the f -word, you can't speak. By obscene language I mean the words banned by the Federal Communications Commission, plus epithets such as "Nigger," even when used by one black student to address another black, or "bitch," even when addressed by a girl to a girlfriend. It is my intent that by the time you leave this school, you will be among the few your age to instinctively distinguish between the elevated and the degraded, the holy and the obscene.
 
Fifth , we will end all self-esteem programs. In this school, self-esteem will be attained in only one way -- the way people attained it until decided otherwise a generation ago -- by earning it. One immediate consequence is that there will be one valedictorian, not eight.
 
Sixth , and last, I am reorienting the school toward academics and away from politics and propaganda. No more time will be devoted to scaring you about smoking and caffeine, or terrifying you about sexual harassment or global warming. No more semesters will be devoted to condom wearing and teaching you to regard sexual relations as only or primarily a health issue... There will be no more attempts to convince you that you are a victim because you are not white, or not male, or not heterosexual or not Christian. We will have failed if any one of you graduates this school and does not consider him or herself inordinately fortunate -- to be alive and to be an American.
 
Now, please stand and join me in the Pledge of Allegiance to the flag of our country. As many of you do not know the words, your teachers will hand them out to you.

Leftism - Part 1

by 

       M. Richard Maxson

    The Constitutional Republic that was created after the Revolutionary War was fragile at the beginning, but it has prospered over the centuries beyond the founding generation’s wildest dreams. Our Founders developed an ingenious system of checks and balances, which George Washington described as, “though not absolutely perfect, it is one of the best in the world.” This government “by the people, for the people.” The primary architects of our constitutional republic understood that history teaches essential lessons. They meticulously studied history and comparative political systems in preparation for crafting a system of government likeliest to maximize liberty.

    Around the same time Socialism began to take hold in France. They were called "Leftists" due the fact that people with certain views sat on the left side of the National Assembly. The French Revolution was their chance to show what they could do when they got the power they sought. In contrast to what they promised -- "liberty, equality, fraternity" -- what they actually produced were food shortages, mob violence and dictatorial powers that included arbitrary executions, extending even to their own leaders.

    By the eve of World War I, poor working and living conditions in American cities helped clear the way for socialism.  In 1912, Socialist Party presidential candidate Eugene Debs won 6 percent of the popular vote.  And there were hundreds of Socialist elected officials in cities and towns across the country. Terrorist bombings and assassinations of government officials that were happening in the United States were the seeds that sprouted agencies like the FBI. These governmental agencies were extremely anti-Communist and crusaded to hinder their spread. The party had other problems."The Socialists, who were a small third party, had very little to offer," says political scientist Gary Marks.  "What they could offer was ideological purity.  They could offer a beacon for a different society.  But the labor unions were rooted in the 'here and now.'"

    The economic upheaval of the 1930s gave many socialists hope that the time had come for a workers’ party in the United States.  But political scientist Benjamin Ginsberg says it was too late. "During the period of the Great Depression and economic downturn, there was more of a possibility for the creation of labor parties," says Ginsberg.  "But with the advent of Franklin Roosevelt and his New Deal coalition, labor became such a prominent force within the Democratic Party that most labor leaders could see no advantage to trying to go out on their own."

   Labor unions have been very active in promoting voter participation within the context of America's two-party system.  And since the Great Depression, organized labor generally has supported the Democratic Party, which has embraced many people on the left of the U.S. political spectrum.

     After the McCarthy hearings left them reeling they reinvented themselves as the "new" left. They threw out the concept of right and wrong for the ideal that it was a persons circumstance that caused all of societies problems. They struggled to avoid facing the plain fact of evil -- that some people simply choose to do things that they know to be wrong when they do them. Every kind of excuse, from poverty to an unhappy childhood, is used by the left to explain and excuse evil.

    Published in 1963, in the congressional records are the 45 goals of the Communist party. One of these is the take over of one of the political parties. The Democratic party was ripe for the taking. Since the Civil War, America's two major political parties, the Democrats and the Republicans, have averaged between them about 95 percent of the popular vote in national elections. Essentially this means that third parties have no chance to gain representation at the national level in the United States.  So it's a logic where one has to try to create the broadest coalition that one can," says Marks. They began to infiltrate and mold the democratic party into their liking. "And to do that means that under normal circumstances, one has to downplay ideology and appeal to as many diverse groups as possible."

NEXT - Part 2 - The Last "Real" Democrat.

                                         

  
   

The Takeover of America

by M. Richard Maxson

    It seems like an eternity ago that the stated goals of the Socialist/Communist party in the

United States were put forward into the congressional record for all to see. There were 45 of these stated goals. For today's discussion I will list their main objectives. This is 1963, so read on and see if they were successful.

                              Communist Goals (1963) Congressional Record

                                                          Appendix,

                                                         pp. A34-A35                                    

                                                     January 10, 1963

 

• Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.
• Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.
• Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.
• Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy-making positions.
• Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.
• Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.
• Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
• Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
• Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a "religious crutch."
• Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."
• Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.
• Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.
• Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.
•  Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

 

    If this were a sporting event it would be labeled a "blowout". They have succeeded beyond their wildest dreams in the takeover of this country. Can we, as a nation, recover to what was once was a shining light for the world?

     As a people, we need to look back and remember what it is that made this nation unique: its commitment to our God-given rights and liberties and the constitutional framework that allowed them to flourish.

    Unless we rededicate ourselves to restoring our liberty tradition and educating the uninitiated about the foundational importance of liberty and how our present course is destined to destroy it, we will not save ourselves.