A History of How the Elitist Bankers Have Controlled the United States - Epilogue - Ukraine

by

       George Sontag

      *What must be understood about what we have been talking about is that Private Central

Banks do not exist to serve the people, the community, or the nation. Private Central Banks exist to serve their owners, to make them rich beyond the dreams of Midas and all for the cost of ink, paper, and the right bribe to the right official. Behind all these wars, all these assassinations, the hundred million horrible deaths from all the wars lies a single policy of dictatorship. The private central bankers allow rulers to rule only on the condition that the people of a nation be enslaved to the private central banks. Failing that, said ruler will be killed, and their nation invaded by those other nations enslaved to private central banks.

      The so-called "clash of civilizations" we read about on the corporate media is really a war between banking systems, with the private central bankers forcing themselves onto the rest of the world, no matter how many millions must die for it. So off to war your children must go, to spill their blood for the money-junkies' gold. We barely survived the last two world wars. In the nuclear/bioweapon age, are the private central bankers willing to risk incinerating the whole planet just to feed their greed?
Apparently so.

      This brings us to the current situation in the Ukraine, Russia, and China.

 

      The European Union had been courting the government of the Ukraine to merge with the EU, and more to the point, entangle their economy with the private owned European Central Bank. The

government of the Ukraine was considering the move, but had made no commitments. Part of their concern lay with the conditions in other EU nations enslaved to the ECB, notably Cyprus, Greece, Spain, and Italy. So they were properly cautious. Then Russia stepped in with a better deal and the Ukraine, exercising the basic choice all consumers have to choose the best product at the best price, dropped the EU and announced they were going to go with Russia's offer. It was at that point that agents provocateurs flooded into the Ukraine, covertly funded by intelligence agency fronts like CANVAS and USAID, stirring up trouble, while the western media proclaimed this was a popular revolution. Snipers shot at people and this violence was blamed on then-President Yanukovich. However a leaked recording of a phone call between the EU's Catherine Ashton and Estonia's Foreign Minister Urmas Paet confirmed the snipers were working for the overthrow plotters, not the Ukrainian government. Urmas Paet has confirmed the authenticity of that phone call.

      This is a classic pattern of covert overthrow we have seen many times before. Since the end of WW2, the US has covertly tried to overthrow the governments of 56 nations, succeeding 25 times. Examples include the 1953 overthrow of Iran's elected government of Mohammed Mossadegh and the imposition of the Shah, the 1973 overthrow of Chile's elected government of Salvador Allende and the imposition of the Pinochet dictatorship, and of course, the current overthrow of Ukraine's elected government of Yanukovich and the imposition of the current unelected government, which is already gutting the Ukraine's wealth to hand to the western bankers.

      Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa have formed a parallel financial system called BRICS, scheduled to officially launch on January 1, 2015. As of this writing some 80 nations are ready to trade with BRICS in transactions that do not involve the US dollar. Despite US economic warfare against both Russia and China, the Ruble and Yuan are seen as more attractive for international trade and banking than the US dollar, hence the US attempt to fan the Ukraine crisis into war with Russia, and attempts to provoke North Korea as a back door to war with China. 

      Propaganda aside, all modern wars are wars by and for the private bankers, fought and bled for by third parties unaware of the true reason they are expected to gracefully be killed and

croppled for. The process is quite simple. As soon as the Private Central Bank issues its currency as a loan at interest, the public is forced deeper and deeper into debt. When the people are reluctant to borrow any more, that is when the Keynesian economists demand the government borrow more to keep the pyramid scheme working. When both the people and government refuse to borrow any more, that is when wars are started, to plunge everyone even deeper into debt to pay for the war, then after the war to borrow more to rebuild. When the war is over, the people have about the same as they did before the war, except the graveyards are far larger and everyone is in debt to the private bankers for the next century. This is why Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was funding the rise of Adolf Hitler.
 
      The next world war for control, we believe, will be between the two banking powerhouses. The western elites, who have ruled for over 400 years, and the new BRICS consortium that is trying to break their stranglehold. As long as Private Central Banks are allowed to exist, inevitably as the night follows day there will be poverty, hopelessness, and millions of deaths in endless World Wars, until the Earth itself is sacrificed in flames. 


                                                                                                                      *Text by Michael Rivero

A History of How the Elitist Bankers Have Controlled the United States - Part 7

by

       George Sontag

      *As America's manufacturing and agriculture had declined, the oil producing nations faced a dilemma. Those piles of US Federal Reserve notes were not able to purchase much from the United States because the United States had little (other than real estate) anyone wanted to buy. Oil producing nations started to talk of selling their oil for whatever currency the purchasers chose to use. Iraq, already hostile to the United States following Desert Storm, demanded the right to sell their oil for Euros in 2000 and in 2002, the United Nations agreed to allow it under the "Oil for food" program instituted following Desert Storm. This could not stand. One year later the United States re-invaded Iraq under the lie of Saddam's nuclear weapons, lynched Saddam Hussein, and placed Iraq's oil back on the world market only for US dollars.

       The clear US policy shift following 9-11, away from being an impartial broker of peace only further eroded confidence in the Petrodollar deal and even more oil producing nations started

openly talking of oil trade for other global currencies. In Libya, Muammar Gaddafi had instituted a state-owned central bank and a value based trade currency, the Gold Dinar. Gaddafi announced that Libya's oil was for sale, but only for the Gold Dinar. Other African nations, seeing the rise of the Gold Dinar and the Euro, flocked to the new Libyan currency for trade. This move had the potential to seriously undermine the global hegemony of the elitist's plan for the dollar. The French elite reportedly went so far as to call Libya a “threat” to the financial security of the world. So, the United States invaded Libya, brutally murdered Qaddafi, imposed a private central bank, and returned Libya's oil output to dollars only. The gold that was to have been made into the Gold Dinars is, as of last report, unaccounted for.

       According to General Wesley Clark, the master plan for the "dollarification" of the world's oil nations included seven initial targets, Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Venezula and Iran. None of theses countries are members of the Bank for International Settlements, the private central bankers private central bank, located in Switzerland. This meant that these nations were deciding for themselves how to run their nations' economies, rather than submit to the international private banks.This also, could not stand.

     Their war agenda is also to force Iran's oil to be sold only for dollars and to force them to

accept a privately owned central bank. Malaysia, one of the few remaining nations without a Rothschild central bank, is now being invaded by a force claimed to be "Al Qaeda" and has suffered numerous suspicious losses of its commercial passenger jets. Suddenly France invades Mali, ostensibly to combat Al Qaeda, with the US joining in. Mali just happens to be one of the world's largest gold producers with gold accounting for 80% of Mali exports. War for the bankers does not get more obvious than that!

       You have been raised by a public school system and media that constantly assures you that the reasons for all these wars and assassinations are many and varied. The US claims to bring democracy to the conquered lands (they haven't; the usual result of a US overthrow is the imposition of a dictatorship, such as the 1953 CIA overthrow of Iran's democratically elected government of Mohammad Mosaddegh and the imposition of the Shah, or the 1973 CIA overthrow of Chile's democratically elected government of President Salvador Allende, and the imposition of Augusto Pinochet), or to save a people from a cruel oppressor, revenge for 9-11, or that tired worn-out catch all excuse for invasion, weapons of mass destruction. Assassinations are always passed off as "crazed lone nuts" to obscure the real agenda.

      The real agenda is simple. It is enslavement of the people by creation of a false sense of

obligation. That obligation is false because the Private Central Banking system, by design, always creates more debt than money with which to pay that debt. Private Central Banking is not science, it is a religion; a set of arbitrary rules created to benefit the priesthood, meaning the elitist owners of the Private Central Bank. The fraud persists, with often lethal results, because the people are tricked into believing that this is the way life is supposed to be and no alternative exists or should be dreamt of. The same was true of two earlier systems of enslavement, Rule by Divine Right and Slavery, both systems built to trick people into obedience, and both now recognized by modern civilizatyion as illegitimate. Now we are entering a time in human history where we will recognize that rule by debt, or rule by Private Central Bankers issuing the public currency as a loan at interest, is equally illegitimate. It works only as long as people allow themselves to believe that this is the way life is supposed to be. 



                                                                                                             
                                                                                                             *Text by Michael Rivero

The Patriot Act - Domestic Spying

by



       M. Richard Maxson



      The deadline for the renewal of the Patriot Act is the end of this week and even with the massive uproar over this unconstitutional piece of legislation, especially section 215, there is still no consensus. The true colors of many Republicans and Democrats are coming to light with their insistence that, regardless of the Constitution, they want to extend ALL portions of the act. If the fourth amendment is ignored again by the three branches of government, does the United States still REALLY exist?
                               
                                                         SECTION 215 -DOMESTIC SPYING 

       The NSA is extremely interested in OUR new form of communication which has experienced such breathtaking success in recent years: smartphones About 130 million people in the US have such a device. The mini-computers have become personal communication centers, digital assistants and life coaches, and they often know more about their users than most users suspect. For an agency like the NSA, the data storage units are a goldmine, combining in a single device almost all the information that would interest an intelligence agency: social contacts, details about the user's behavior and location, interests (through search terms, for example), photos and sometimes credit card numbers and passwords.

      

      In exploiting the smartphone, the intelligence agency takes advantage of the carefree approach many users take to the device. According to one NSA presentation, smartphone users demonstrate "nomophobia," or "no mobile phobia." The only thing many users worry about is losing reception. A detailed NSA presentation titled, "Does your target have a smartphone?" shows how extensive the surveillance methods against users of Apple's popular iPhone already are. According to one NSA document, these files contain the kind of information that is of particular interest to analysts, such as lists of contacts, call logs and drafts of text messages. To sort out such data, the analysts don't even require access to the iPhone itself, the document indicates. The department merely needs to infiltrate the target's computer, with which the smartphone is synchronized, in advance. Under the heading "iPhone capability," the NSA specialists list the kinds of data they can analyze in these cases. The document notes that there are small NSA programs, known as "scripts," that can perform surveillance on 38 different features of the iPhone 3 and 4 operating systems. They include the mapping feature, voicemail and photos, as well as the Google Earth, Facebook and Yahoo Messenger applications. The NSA analysts are especially enthusiastic about the geolocation data stored in smartphones and many of their apps, data that enables them to determine a user's whereabouts at a given time. The bottom line is that if you own a smartphone you are already compromised. Once your entire life is connected and online, some company somewhere will end up knowing you better than you know yourself.
 

          If this legislation is left to stand the future of personal
privacy is over. The big boys already have plans in place. Imagine if every single gadget in your life was "smart." Your self-driving car could let your house know you're on the way home so it can adjust the thermostat and kick on the lights. Maybe your smartwatch knows from your vital signs you had a stressful day, so it has your car activate some soothing music that transfers seamlessly to your home stereo when you walk in the door. It could even tell your smart tub to draw a bath. Your fridge could detect that you're out of milk. Your smart mattress notes that you didn't sleep well. The possibilities are endless. Controlling your home from a distance and getting gadgets to talk to each other sounds like science fiction, but it's real and companies are working to make the scenarios I gave above a reality. This so-called "Internet of Things" could be the next big advance in human culture and lifestyle.

      

      There's a key word in the "Internet of Things" that's always troubling and that's "Internet." To work together, gadgets have to connect to the Internet and upload their data to the company that made them. While this data is supposed to be anonymous, don't think for a second that companies aren't thinking about ways to sell your data or serve you ads to boost their revenue. It doesn't help that every gadget out there has a unique privacy policy, and most of them aren't very specific. We saw that firsthand earlier this year when the news broke that Samsung smart TVs were listening to their owners' private conversations.

      This is going to be the next big breach in your personal privacy. In fact, it could already be affecting you. One recurring theme of connected gadgets so far is that the manufacturers haven't thought enough about security. Every new gadget has weak points that hackers can use to get your information, from smart thermostats to car insurance and life insurance trackers. Just the other day, we found out that poor security in drug pumps could let a hacker take over and sabotage an entire hospital's critical care equipment.

       That's bad enough when gadgets are working on their own and hackers have to tap into each one individually. However, when every gadgets is connected through a central service, like Apple's HealthKit or whatever Google, Microsoft, Honeywell and other companies are cooking up, a hacker will only need to break into one thing to see your entire life. A burglar will know when you aren't at home and probably what security system you have. Scammers will know if you're having health problems, what you eat, what music you listen to and other things that could make it easy to trick you into giving up even more information in an email or on the phone. A practical joker could mess with your lights, music, temperature, coffee, laundry or even your car. And, of course, because everything is tied together, an identity thief could really take over your entire life.

       That just leaves the question of what you can do about it? If the country is to be saved the citizens MUST engage in the

running of the society. Any public official that endorses the status quo has cast aside their oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution; they rejected his oath to enforce all federal laws faithfully; and they are moving the government decidedly in the direction of secret laws, secret procedures and secret courts. Such purported statutory authority directly violates the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantees the right to privacy in our "persons, houses, papers and effects." That includes just about everything held by the custodians of our records. Privacy is not only a constitutional right protected by the document; it is also a natural right. We possess the right to privacy by virtue of our humanity. Our rights come from within us -- whether you believe we are the highest progression of biological forces or the intended creations of an Almighty God.

A History of How the Elitist Bankers Have Controlled the United States - Part 6

by

      George Sontag

      * President John F. Kennedy understood the predatory nature of private central banking. He

understood why Andrew Jackson fought so hard to end the Second Bank of the United States. So Kennedy wrote and signed Executive Order 11110 which ordered the US Treasury to issue a new public currency, the United States Note. Kennedy's United States Notes were not borrowed from the Federal Reserve but created by the US Government and backed by the silver stockpiles held by the US Government. It represented a return to the system of economics the United States had been founded on, and was perfectly legal for Kennedy to do. All told, some four and one half billion dollars went into public circulation, eroding interest payments to the Federal Reserve and loosening their control over the nation. Five months later John F. Kennedy was

John J. McCloy

assassinated in Dallas Texas, and the United States Notes pulled from circulation and destroyed (except for samples held by collectors). John J. McCloy, President of the Chase Manhattan Bank, and President of the World Bank, was named to the Warren Commission, presumably to make certain the banking dimensions behind the assassination were concealed from the public.
    
      We, at the American Constitutionalist firmly believe that the next world war will pit the elitists of the western world against the up and coming banking system emerging from the second-world countries of the world.It is known today as BRICS. This is why NATO is pushing up to Russia's doorstep, why the west is supporting a Nazi-like regime in Ukraine, and why the United States is also moving towards a more active Asian policy. Future history will most certainly describe this as World War Three.

                                                                     HOW WE GOT HERE 


      We need to examine the financial dimensions behind the push towards war. Towards the end of World War Two, when it became obvious that the allies were going to win and dictate the post war

The Infamous Bretton Woods

environment, the major world economic powers met at Bretton Woods, a luxury resort in New Hampshire in July of 1944, and hammered out the Bretton Woods agreement for international finance. The British Pound lost its position as the global trade and reserve currency to the US dollar (part of the price demanded by Roosevelt in exchange for the US entry into the war). Absent the economic advantages of being the world's "go-to" currency, Britain was forced to nationalize the Bank of England in 1946. The Bretton Woods agreement, ratified in 1945, in addition to making the dollar the global reserve and trade currency, obligated the signatory nations to tie their currencies to the dollar. The nations that ratified Bretton Woods did so on two conditions. The first was that the Federal Reserve would refrain from over-printing the dollar as a means to loot real products and produce from other nations in exchange for ink and paper; basically an imperial tax. That assurance was backed up by the second requirement, which was that the US dollar would always be convertible to gold at $35 per ounce.

      The Federal Reserve, being a private bank and not answerable to the US Government, did start overprinting paper dollars, and much of the perceived prosperity of the 1950s and 1960s was the result of foreign nations' obligations to accept the paper notes as being worth gold at the rate of $35 an ounce. Then in 1970, France looked at the huge pile of paper notes sitting in their vaults, for which real French products like wine and cheese had been traded, and notified the United States government that they would exercise their option under Bretton Woods to return the paper notes for gold at the $35 per ounce exchange rate. The United States had nowhere near the gold to redeem the paper notes, so on August 15th, 1971, Richard Nixon "temporarily" suspended the gold convertibility of the US Federal Reserve Notes. Later termed the "Nixon shock", this move effectively ended Bretton Woods and many global currencies started to delink from the US dollar.


                                                               THE SELLING OFF OF AMERICA 

     Worse, since the United States had collateralized their loans with the nation's gold reserves, it quickly became apparent that the US Government did not in fact have enough gold to cover the outstanding debts. Foreign nations began to get very nervous about their loans to the US and understandably were reluctant to loan any additional money to the United States without some form of collateral. So Richard Nixon started the environmental movement, with the EPA and its various programs such as "wilderness zones", Roadless areas", Heritage rivers", "Wetlands", all of which took vast areas of public lands and made them off limits to the American people who were technically the owners of those lands. But Nixon had little concern for the environment and the real purpose of this land grab under the guise of the environment was to pledge those pristine lands and their vast mineral resources as collateral on the national debt. The plethora of different programs was simply to conceal the true scale of how much American land was being pledged to foreign lenders as collateral on the government's debts; eventually almost 25% of the nation itself. All of this is illegal as the Enclave Clause of the Constitution limits the Federal Government to owning the land under Federal Government buildings and military bases, and that Enclave Clause was written into the Constitution by the Founding Fathers to specifically to prevent the Federal Government simply seizing the land belonging to the people to sell off, pledge as collateral, or rent!

Land no longer owned by the United States

                                   WHY WE ARE ENGAGED IN THE MIDDLE EAST

      With open lands for collateral already in short supply, the US Government embarked on a new program to shore up sagging international demand for the dollar. The United States approached the world's oil producing nations, mostly in the Middle East, and offered them a deal. In exchange for only selling their oil for dollars, the United States would guarantee the military safety of those oil-rich nations. The oil rich nations would agree to spend and invest their US paper dollars inside the United States, in particular in US Treasury Bonds, redeemable through future generations of US taxpayers. The concept was labeled the "petrodollar". In effect, the US, no longer able to back the dollar with gold, was now backing it with oil. Other peoples' oil. And that necessity to keep control over those oil nations to prop up the dollar has shaped America's foreign policy in the region ever since.

      In the next installment: The scramble to keep the illusion of prosperity alive.


                                                 
                                                                                                            *Text by Michael Rivero

A History of How the Elitist Bankers Have Controlled the United States - Part 5

by

       George Sontag

      * With the victory of the National Socialist party, Germany threw off the elitist banker cabal and it's economy flourished becoming, once again, a threat to the western powers. 
"Germany's unforgivable crime before WW2 was its attempt to loosen its economy out of the world trade system and to build up an independent exchange system from which the world-finance couldn't profit anymore. The war wasn't only about abolishing fascism, but to conquer sales markets."-Winston Churchill
Great Britain and other nations boycotted Germany in an attempt to destroy it's economic success. Threatened by Germany's economic power they looked for an excuse to go to war. "
We could have, if we had intended so, prevented this war from breaking out without doing one shot, but we didn't want to." --Winston Churchill

As public anger in Germany grew over the boycott, Hitler foolishly gave them that excuse.

      Meanwhile, on the other side of the Atlantic, Wall Street bankers and financiers had bankrolled the successful coups by both Hitler and Mussolini. Brown Brothers Harriman in New York was financing Hitler right up to the day war was declared with Germany. They decided that a fascist dictatorship in the United States based on the one on Italy would be far better for their business interests than Roosevelt's "New Deal" which threatened massive wealth re-distribution to recapitalize the working and middle class of America. So the Wall Street tycoons recruited General Butler to lead the overthrow of the US Government and install a "Secretary of General Affairs" who would be answerable to Wall Street and not the people, would crush social unrest and shut down all labor unions. General Butler pretended to go along with the scheme but then exposed the plot to Congress. Congress, then as now in the pocket of the Wall Street bankers, refused to act. When Roosevelt learned of the planned coup he demanded the arrest of the plotters, but the plotters simply reminded Roosevelt that if any one of them were sent to prison, their friends on Wall Street would deliberately collapse the still-fragile economy and blame Roosevelt for it. Roosevelt was thus unable to act until the start of WW2, at which time he prosecuted many of the plotters under the Trading With The Enemy Act. The Congressional minutes into the coup were finally declassified in 1967, but rumors of the attempted coup became the inspiration for the movie, "Seven Days in May" but with the true financial villains erased from the script.



       Who was General Butler? He was former US Marine Corps Commandant who spent 33 years and four months in active military service. He was also the elitist's "problem solver". In 1935 he described his career:

• "I spent more of my time being a high--class muscle man for Big Business, for Wall Street and for the bankers".
• "I helped make Mexico and especially Tampico safe for American oil interests in 1914".
• "I helped make Haiti and Cuba a decent place for the National City Bank boys to collect revenues in".
• "I helped in the raping of half a dozen Central American republics for the benefit of Wall Street".
• " I helped purify Nicaragua for the international banking house of Brown Brothers in 1909-12".
• "I brought light to the Dominican Republic for American sugar interests in 1916".
• "In China in 1927 I helped see to it that the Standard Oil went its way unmolested".

"I was a racketeer, a gangster for capitalism. I was rewarded with honors, medals and promotion. Looking back on it, I feel I might have given Al Capone a few hints".
- General Smedley Butler, former US Marine Corps Commandant

      Between the world wars our military was very busy doing the bidding of "War for Profit" western elite. Their profits exploded between 1941-1945 and they resolved never to give up this power again and would continue to do whatever it took to keep it. A shadow government, to be sure and it continues to this day as we will examine in our next installment.



                                                                                                            *Text by Michael Rivero

A History of How the Elitist Bankers Have Controlled the United States - Part 4

by


       George Sontag

      *The swearing in of Progressive Theodore Roosevelt opened the doors for the elite and  in 1913, the Private Central Bankers of Europe, in particular the Rothschilds of Great Britain and the Warburgs of Germany, met with their American financial collaborators on Jekyll Island, Georgia to form a new banking cartel with the express purpose of forming the Third Bank of the United States, with the aim of placing complete control of the United States money supply once again under the control of private bankers. Owing to hostility over the previous banks, the name was changed to "The Federal Reserve" system in order to grant the new bank a quasi-governmental image, but in fact it is a privately owned bank, no more "Federal" than Federal Express.

      1913 proved to be a trans formative year for the nation's economy, first with the passage of the 16th "income tax" Amendment and the false claim that it had been ratified. In 2003, U.S. District Court Judge James C. Fox, commenting on the case of Sullivan Vs. United States,stated,

"I think if you were to go back and and try to find and review the ratification of the 16th amendment, which was the internal revenue, the income tax, I think if you went back and examined that carefully, you would find that a sufficient number of states never ratified that amendment." (*Editors Note - This ruling means that the 16th Amendment is not legal under the Constitution.)

 

       Later that same year, and apparently unwilling to risk

another questionable amendment, Congress passed the Federal Reserve Act over Christmas holiday 1913, while members of Congress opposed to the measure were at home. This was a very underhanded deal, as the Constitution explicitly vests Congress with the authority to issue the public currency, does not authorize its delegation, and thus should have required a new Amendment to transfer that authority to a private bank. But pass it Congress did, and President Woodrow Wilson signed it as he promised the bankers he would in exchange for generous campaign contributions.

(*Editors Note - Under the Constitution, only a new Amendment could transfer the government's authority to create the currency to a private party.)

The next year, World War One started, and it is important to remember that prior to the creation of the Federal Reserve, there was no such thing as a world war. Woodrow Wilson later regretted his decision to turn over the nations currency to private bankers. "I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is now controlled by its system of credit. We are no longer a government by free opinion, no longer a government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men." -- Woodrow Wilson 1919

     
      In 1914, with the United States economy now under their control the elitists turned their attention to Europe and although the war started between Austria-Hungary and Serbia , they quickly shifted to focus on Germany, whose industrial capacity was seen as an economic threat to Great Britain, who saw the decline of the British Pound as a result of too much emphasis on financial activity to the neglect of agriculture, industrial development, and infrastructure (not unlike the present day United States). Pre-war Germany had a private central bank under government control and it was heavily restricted by law.  When the elitist bankers broke free of government control, massive inflation followed (mostly triggered by currency speculators) , permanently trapping the German people in endless debt and the elitists reaped the rewards.

 

      

      When the Weimar Republic collapsed economically, it

opened the door for the National Socialists to take power. Their first financial move was to issue their own state currency which was not borrowed from private central bankers. Freed from having to pay interest on the money in circulation, Germany blossomed and quickly began to rebuild its industry. The media called it "The German Miracle".  TIME magazine lionized Hitler for the amazing improvement in life for the German people and the explosion of German industry, and even named him TIME Magazine's Man Of The Year in 1938. The elephant in the room was that Germany's state-issued value based currency was also a direct threat to the wealth and power of the private central banks, and as early as 1933 they started to organize a global boycott against Germany to strangle this upstart ruler who thought he could break free of private central bankers!

       The elite was out of power again in Germany. This could not, would not stand. This first destruction of a free government via a European war wasn't enough to solidify their grip, they had to try again. We will continue in our next installment.

                                                     

                                                                          *Text by Michael Rivero

                                                                                                                                                                 

     

A History of How the Elitist Bankers Have Controlled the United States - Part 3

by

       George Sontag

       Goaded by the private bankers, much of Europe supported the Confederacy against the Union, with the expectation that victory over Lincoln would mean the end of the Greenback.

Tsar Alexander II

France and Britain considered an outright attack on the United States to aid the confederacy, but were held at bay by Russia, which had just ended the serfdom system and had a state central bank similar to the system the United States had been founded on. Left free of European intervention, the Union won the war, and Lincoln announced his intention to go on issuing greenbacks. Following Lincoln's assassination, Tsar Alexander II, who authorized Russian military assistance to Lincoln, was subsequently the victim of multiple attempts on his life in 1866, 1879, and 1880, until his assassination in 1881.

       After an attempt to remove Lincoln's successor failed and Johnson's administration was out of office the elitists renewed their attempts to take over the nations money supply and  in 1872 New York bankers sent a letter to every bank in the United States, urging them to fund newspapers that opposed government-issued money (Lincoln's greenbacks). "Dear Sir: It is advisable to do all in your power to sustain such prominent daily and weekly newspapers... as will oppose the issuing of greenback paper money, and that you also withhold patronage or favors from all applicants who are not willing to oppose the Government issue of money. It will not do to allow the greenback, as it is called, to circulate as money any length of time, as we cannot control that. Slavery is likely to be abolished by the war power, and chattel slavery destroyed. This, I and my European friends are in favor of, for slavery is but the owning of labor and carries with it the care for the laborer, while the European plan, led on by England, is for capital to control labor by controlling the wages. THIS CAN BE DONE BY CONTROLLING THE MONEY."

      The Greenbacks were pulled from circulation and the American people forced to go back to an economy based on bank notes borrowed at interest from the private bankers. With the end of Lincoln's Greenbacks, the US could no longer create its own interest free money and was manipulated during the term of President Ruthford B. Hayes into borrowing from the Rothschilds banking system and in 1878, restoring to the Rothschilds control of the US economy they had lost under Andrew Jackson.
April 12,1878.
Hon. John Sherman,
Secretary of the Treasury, Washington D. C.:
Very pleased we have entered into relations again with American Government. Shall do our best to make the business successful. - ROTHSCHILDS.

President James Garfield

      It appeared that their control wouldn't last long when James A. Garfield was elected President in 1880 on a platform

of government control of the money supply.
"The chief duty of the National Government in connection with the currency of the country is to coin money and declare its value. He who controls the money supply of a nation controls the nation". -- James Garfield
Garfield was shot on July 2, 1881 and died of his wounds several weeks later.

President William McKinley

      The next challenge to the elitists was in 1896 when William McKinley was elected President in the middle of a depression-driven debate over gold-backed government currency versus bank notes borrowed at interest from private banks. McKinley favored gold-backed currencies and a balanced government budget which would free the public from accumulating debt. "Our financial system needs some revision; our money is all good now, but its value must not further be threatened. Our currency should continue under the supervision of the Government."
-- William McKinley
McKinley was shot by an out-of-work anarchist on September 14, 1901, in Buffalo, NY, succumbing to his wounds a few days later.

      In the early years of our nation, leading up to the beginning of the twentieth century, there is a pattern of behind the scenes activity that are linked by one common thread - the take over of the government of the United States by mean of controlling it's purse. This pattern continues as we will discuss in our next installment.
 




                                                                                                                 *Text by Michael Rivero