by
M.
Richard Maxson
Fifty
years ago, Republicans had a big financial advantage, and few rich
people backed liberals. In the 21st century this is not the
case. Democrats have become the party of the rich. Most of
today’s rich love Barack Obama—so much so
that Washington D.C. area airports ran out of space to
handle all of the private jets flying in the well-heeled for both of
his inaugurals and high cost parties. Democrats now control the
majority of the nation's wealthiest congressional jurisdictions. More
than half of the wealthiest households are concentrated in the 18
states where Democrats control both Senate seats. This new political
demography holds true in the House of Representatives, where the
leadership of each party hails from different worlds. Nancy Pelosi,
Democratic leader of the House of Representatives, represents one of
America's wealthiest regions. Her San Francisco district has more
than 43,700 high-end households. So please, enough of this about
Democrats being the party of the little guy.
In
2012, Barack Obama carried eight of America's 10 wealthiest counties.
He carried the majority of the richer rich, those making
$200,000 or more per
year. These rich Democrats level
of wealth is different, and how they earn it is different. They
live in rich social enclaves. They live on the two coasts,
and have a different value system. They are not religious.
They are not family oriented and they are determined to "change"
America. The most famous example would be in the entertainment
industry, where star-studded events have become a significant part of
Democratic fund raising culture. These “elite”
group of liberal “millionaires and billionaires” is pumping money
into an elaborate network of groups to influence the country's
policies, even using “shady” donations from foreign companies to
fund their efforts.
There
is argument over the definition of what is rich. Mainstream
media supports Democrat propaganda by defining rich as households
that earn more than $75,000. In today's world, seventy-five
thousand for a two-income household is not rich. The unbiased Pew
Report states that the median wealth for the middle
class was
$96,500. A review of the 20 richest Americas found that 60
percent affiliate with the Democratic Party…Among the richest
families, the Democratic advantage rises even higher, to 75
percent.
This
falsehood of fighting against those "rich Republicans"continues
to be pushed as a main driving force of the Democrats and the mostly
uneducated people in this country consider it as truth. The real
truth is that it is the education levels that prove that Republicans
are the party of America’s middle and working class, while
Democrats are the party of the extremes. People who vote
Democrat haven’t graduated from high school or else tend to have
post-graduate degrees. The majority of high school graduates, people
with some college, and people with a college degree are Republican.
Education largely determines class in this country. The educated can
plainly see the "big lie" but judging by the last few
decades election results, many cannot.
If
the media would ever check Democrat talking points, the evidence that
Democrats are the party of the rich is easy to find. There
are now more Democratic millionaires in Congress than
Republican ones. Of 534 current members of Congress, at least 268
were millionaires, according the Center for Responsive Politics’
review of financial disclosure reports filed last year. The
Democratic party is that the party is increasingly ruled by the “new
oligarchs.” In his review of The New Class
Conflict, by Joel Kotkin,
a lifelong Democrat, George Will explains that there is
a “growing alliance between the ultra-wealthy and the
instruments of state power. The bigger the government, the easier it
is for the increased power to be abused by moneyed interests. Growing
the government doesn’t change that fact; it only changes the people
who become rich. In Hollywood and high tech, there is a sudden jump
into wealth. The very richest of these are Democrats.
Yes,
but haven’t many of the leading plutocrats, such as Warren
Buffett and Bill Gates, embraced higher income taxes? Yes,
they have, but one important fact has escaped notice: higher income
tax rates will not touch the bulk of the fortunes of today’s
plutocrats, for the simple reason that the great bulk of the
accumulated wealth of Gates, Buffett, Silicon Valley and Wall Street
consists of appreciated asset values—not ordinary income. Few seem
to be aware that most of this wealth has never been taxed, and in the
case of Buffett and Gates, who are taking advantage of the charitable
foundation laws, will never be taxed. Rich Leftists are not stupid,
but maybe we Americans still are.
No comments:
Post a Comment