by
Zeno
Potas
Another
week, another court ruling allowing non-citizens to effect the
election by allowing them to vote as if they were Americans. This is a direct violation of the U.S. Constituion. Under Article I, Secion 2
and the Seventeenth Amendment to the Constitution, states
have the power to set
the “Qualification requisite for
electors.” As with many issues, the Left disdains the balance the
Framers adopted in the Constitution and objects to this delegation of
power to the states. The Justice
Department has been actively engaged in blocking an independent
bipartisan federal agency from allowing a state to verify that only
citizens are registering to vote.They prefer to see power over
elector eligibility centralized in Washington, D.C.
Recent
court ruling have left polling stations with the instructions that
proof of citizenship is somehow politically incorrect and all that is
required to vote is to show up! and state that you are a citizen
because nobody lies. How do you think the Internal Revenue Service
would respond if we all said it would have to take our word for our
income and expenses based on our "declarations" and we were
not going to furnish 1099s, W2s or expense receipts? What would the
NSA say if all airline passengers simply refused to show their
driver's licenses at airport security checkpoints? Is the integrity
of our elections so unimportant to President Obama's Progressives and
the rest of the Democratic cabal that they refuse to impose the
slightest checks against voter fraud? The answer is yes. His
nominations to the Federal Courts over the last decade HAS
fundamentally changed America.
What
you need to understand is that with the Progressive Socialists, this
bunch of Democrats, everything is about politics. For
them, the end
justifies any means, and their paramount end is to get Democrats
elected, and so they will pursue it, even at the expense of the
integrity of the system. This is undeniable given their opposition to
voter-ID laws. What other conclusion can we draw from their
opposition than they want to increase Democratic votes with voters
who abuse the election process? Democratic
political strategists Ruy Teixeira and John Judis have been gloating
for 20 years about how post-1965 immigration would soon produce a
country where Republicans could not win an election, anywhere. That
one-party Progressives would control the country - forever. This
government for the people and by the people has is turning into a
joke.
At
this time there are several well-funded organizations, including the
League of Women
Voters and the NAACP, who are fighting efforts to prevent
non-citizens from voting illegally in the upcoming presidential
election. They are losing every battle in a court system that has
been strewn with Socialist leaning judges that have been appointed by
the Progressive Socialists in our government including the President.
Who would have imagined just a decade ago that today the executive
branch of the federal government and a good chunk of its legislative
branch would be dominated by radical Leftist organizers wreaking
havoc on the rule of law and our cherished principles of equal
protection under the law and the impartial administration of justice?
Peter
Kirsanow,
a Republican appointee to the U.S. Commission of Civil Rights who has
warned of dangers from mass illegal immigrant voting. He said the
federal government does almost nothing to help states try to weed out
ineligible voters, and once they have driver’s licenses and Social
Security numbers it’s nearly impossible for states to spot them on
their own. “Even if an ineligible voter does not sway the outcome
of an election, his vote still chips away at the legitimacy of the
voting system,” Mr.
Kirsanow said in a letter to congressional leaders. “Every person
who votes despite being ineligible cancels out the vote of an
eligible voter.”
The
problem is real. It is not a "myth." It's unacceptable and
it must be dealt with. A recent Rasmussen poll of “Likely U.S.
Voters” shows that 78 percent favor voter ID
laws that include proof of U.S. Citizenship, with only 19
percent opposing that requirement. Other polls show broad support for
voter photo ID, regardless of race or party but the powers that be
will have none of it. Secretary of State Project co-founder Rebecca
Bond once said, "Any serious commitment to wrestling control of
the country from the Republican Party must include removing their
political operatives from deciding who can vote and whose votes will
count."
The
U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of voter ID in a 6-3
decision in 2008. Since that time, 34 states have adopted some form
of ID laws, according to the National Conference of State
Legislatures. Almost every one of those laws have been neutered by
the Leftist courts. The idea of controlling who counts the legal votes is
hardly original. Remember it was
Joseph Stalin who once said: “The people who cast the votes decide
nothing. The people who count the votes decide everything.”
No comments:
Post a Comment