By
Phillip
Todd
The
NY Times is once again acting more like the personal propaganda arm
of the US neo-con elite who have been dragging the US into one war
after another to line their pockets with blood stained profits. This
time the US is pushing for a war with Russia. This war cannot be sold
on its own merits and so the propaganda flows daily so that it can be
sold as a humanitarian mission to prevent more unconscionable acts
from being carried out by that “evil Putin.” This “war for
profit” crowd hide in the shadows, they never come out in the open.
They use their media to hide behind anonymity. Your tip-off is the
number of times you read the words “US officials” or “a highly
placed source” or some other phrase that hides the individual while
evoking authority.
The
New York Times‘s editorial board has supported every single US
war—Persian Gulf, Bosnia, Kosovo, Iraq, Libya—for the past 30
years. While its reporting and op-eds on these wars has often been
critical, much of it’s coverage has also helped to sell war-weary
liberals on the current military mission—the most notable example
being Judith Miller and Michael Gordon’s hyping Iraq’s
nonexistent nuclear program in the buildup to the March 2003
invasion. Indeed, the image of The New York Times as an objective,
unbiased news outlet is precisely how it was able to sell the war in
the first place.”
"It
is alarming that military intervention in internal conflicts in
foreign countries has become commonplace for the United States. Is it
in America’s long-term interest? I doubt it. Millions around the
world increasingly see America not as a model of democracy, but as
relying solely on brute force, cobbling coalitions together under the
slogan “you’re either with us or against us.” - Vladimir Putin
To
most Europeans, America now looks like the most dangerous country in
the world but it's own citizens seem to be clueless to this world
view. Since America is unquestionably the most powerful country, the
transformation of America’s image within the last 30 years is very
frightening for Europeans. It is probably still more frightening for
the great majority of the human race who are neither Europeans nor
North Americans. Washington has openly declared its right to use
military force unilaterally and anywhere - to defend its own
interests. Military intervention has become a norm, even though all
military operations that the United States has conducted during the
recent years, ended deplorably.
Russia
is being left no options other than to prepare itself for the worst –
a nuclear war with the Western elite. The
U.S. Actions have forced them to recently sign military pacts with
China and India. They have had to move nuclear missiless into
Kaliningrad to off set NATO's newmissiless in Poland. In an attempt
to help Europe with the ISIS inspired immigration, they joined the
fight against Islamic terrorists only to find themselves in the U.S.
cross-hairs because they were bombing ALL terrorists including the
ones being trained and financed by the U.S.
"Terrorists
are terrorists," stated Vladimir Putin but apparently not when they
are U.S. terrorists. This is leading toward a “no-fly zone” being
discussed by NATO which would prevent Russia from any more assistance
in the fight or face the fact that they will have to defend
themselves against the West shooting down their planes. A
Russian newspaper predicts a direct military confrontation between
Russia and the United States as tensions heat up over Syria, stoking
worries about World War III.
“Just imagine that the U.S. does what it has wanted to do for a
long time and strike against [Syrian President Bashar] Assad, not by
mistake but on purpose and openly,” the
newspaper said.
“Should Russia defend its ally or consider striking against the
Americans, but this would definitely lead to a Third World War.”
German Foreign
Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier told Bild newspaper the situation
now is more dangerous than during the Cold War. German politician
Willy Wimmer suggested that it has demonstrated that Russia is the
only major power ready to seriously fight terrorism, and to call
for an end to a war which risks spreading across the region. The
US and its allies, meanwhile, have only managed to throw a wrench in
the peace process, and have been unable to reach any of their own
goals due to the Russian intervention, the politician argues.
Germany
to tell people to stockpile food and water in case of attacks
Aug
21, 2016
For the first time
since the end of the Cold War, the German
government plans to
tell citizens to stockpile food and water
in
case of an attack or catastrophe, the Frankfurter
Allgemeine
Sonntagszeitung
newspaper reported on Sunday.
Russia
tells citizens to ‘prepare for nuclear war with West’
Oct
4, 2016
Russia
has warned citizens that a nuclear war with the West could be
imminent – sparked by clashes in the Middle East.Zvezda, a
nationwide TV service run by the country’s Ministry of Defence,
said last week, ‘Schizophrenics
from America are sharpening nuclear weapons for Moscow.’
Officials said on Friday that underground shelters had been built
which could house 12 milion people – enough for the entire
population of Moscow.
With
the coronation of Hillary the First just months away and her
statements that are clearly backed by the military-industrial elite,
this could get very serious.
This
situation hast he potential to literally end the US as we know it
because this time it will be nuclear and, as in Vietnam, the only ones to
win will be the elites.
* Philip Todd in the European columnist for The American Constituionalist.
