by
George Sontag
It
was quiet in eastern Ukraine last Wednesday. Indeed, it was another
quiet day in an extended stretch of relative calm. The battles
between the Ukrainian army and the pro-Russian separatists had
largely stopped and heavy weaponry was being withdrawn. The Minsk
cease-fire wasn't holding perfectly, but it was holding. On
that same day, General Philip Breedlove, the top NATO commander in
Europe, stepped
before the press in Washington. Putin, the 59- year-old said, had
once again "upped the ante" in eastern Ukraine --
with "well over a thousand combat vehicles, Russian combat
forces, some of their most sophisticated air defense, battalions of
artillery" having been sent to the Donbass. "What is
clear," Breedlove said, "is that right now, it is not
getting better. It is getting worse every day."
German leaders in
Berlin were stunned. They didn't understand what Breedlove was
talking about. And it wasn't the first time. the German authorities
are “alarmed” by
the US general’s statements on the Ukrainian conflict as his
numbers of alleged Russian presence in Donetsk and Lugansk have
always been significantly higher
than those available to European members of NATO. Once again, the
German government, supported by intelligence gathered by the
Bundesnachrichtendienst (BND), Germany's foreign intelligence agency,
did not share the view of NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Europe
(SACEUR). The German Chancellery “simply shake their
heads” each time Breedlove makes comments on Ukraine, Der
Spiegel said. “False claims and exaggerated accounts, warned a
top German official during a recent meeting on Ukraine, have put NATO
– and by extension, the entire West – in danger of losing its
credibility,” the paper wrote. The
sources in the Chancellor’s office told the reporter that
they viewed Breedlove's comments as “dangerous
propaganda.” Foreign
Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier even found it necessary recently to
bring up Breedlove's comments with NATO General Secretary
Jens Stoltenberg.
According to the
Spiegel, it is not the first time They drew several more examples of
General Breedlove’s “slips of the tongue,” including one he
dropped at the
beginning of the crisis; Breedlove
said that Russians allegedly gathered 40,000 troops on the Ukrainian
border and the situation was
“incredibly concerning” as they were preparing for an invasion.
Berlin
ordered its Federal Intelligence Service to verify the numbers
described by the top NATO commander and the check revealed “There
weren’t 40,000 soldiers on the border, they believed, rather there
were much less than 30,000 and perhaps even fewer
than 20,000. Furthermore, most of the military equipment had not been
brought to the border for a possible invasion, but had already been
there prior to the beginning of the conflict. Furthermore, there was
no evidence of logistical preparation
for an invasion, such as a field headquarters,” Der Spiegel wrote.
The German
government is alarmed and has stated that the
NATO commander also made “inexact, contradictory
or even flat-out inaccurate statements,” the
sources said. Are
the Americans trying to thwart
European efforts at mediation led by Chancellor Angela Merkel? Even
those American intelligence officials who supply the BND with
daily situation reports were much more reserved about the incidents.
One intelligence agent says it "remains
a riddle until today" how General Breedlove reached his
conclusions. There
are many at NATO headquarters in Brussels
who are likewise concerned about Breedlove's statements. On Tuesday
of last week, Breedlove's public appearances were an official item on
the agenda of the North Atlantic Council's weekly lunch meeting.
Several ambassadors present criticized Breedlove and expressed their
incredulity
at some of the commander's statements. Propaganda is one thing but
outright lies that can be easily disproven are another.
Western
leaders, specifically NATO-countries, they really need public opinion
to be backing whatever moves they are making
around the world. In the case of Ukraine this is quite an aggressive
move by NATO allies led by Washington DC. So
it requires a lot of very sophisticated media and public opinion
forming, and I think that’s what we are seeing. This is being
discredited by the wild statements from the US commander. It
is, however, unclear how far the US will push Russia – that may be
decided upon by the level to
which the American public is tricked into believing that Russia is
‘the bad guy’ in Ukraine. And although American’s appetite for
war is low right now, passiveness is very high as evidenced by the
lack of resistance to Obama’s covert wars.
Those
pushing for US control of Ukraine may have underestimated Russia, as
the situation
in Ukraine has obviously not worked out the way the US expected. So
now it appears
that the Obama administration is acting more desperately. They want
the war resumed as quickly as possible, but Angela Merkel and other
European leaders have urged that it not be resumed at all.
Consequently, there is a split in the Western alliance about this
matter. Europe doesn’t want to be involved in a war against Russia
because it could turn nuclear quickly. However, on March 12th, the US
led government's Yatsenyuk stated that “Ukraine is in a state of war with
… the Russian Federation.” That is the service he is now
providing to Barack Obama, and to the 90%+ of the members of the U.S.
Congress who likewise want this war and to begin arms shipments quickly as to keep our "war for profit" economy from
collapse. If it weren’t so tragic, it would be somewhat entertaining
to see what preposterous projection of lies the US comes
up with next. I'm sure we'll find out very soon.
No comments:
Post a Comment