Was January 3, 2007 - the Death of the United States?

 by

       M. Richard Maxson

      The end of the United States of America as envisioned and established by our Founders, according to some modern scholars, was January 3rd 2007. It is the day Democrat/Progressive Socialist party took total control over the government. By years end the Democrat Party controlled a majority in both chambers and the Presidency for the first time since the end of the 103rd Congress in 1995.

     They were elected by demonizing their rival party by using their well controlled lapdog media. The propaganda tool used was the liberals propagating the fallacy that everything is "Bush' s (and the Republicans) Fault” and that the country was in terrible shape because of it. This, and other lies, were told over and over again by a press that has long ago been removed from investigative journalism. Since they won't do it, shall we review the true facts?

At that time:

The DOW Jones closed at 12,621.77

The GDP for the previous quarter was 3.5%.

The Unemployment rate was 4.6%.

George Bush' s Economic policies 

SET A RECORD of 52 STRAIGHT MONTHS of JOB GROWTH!

      If the Democrats inherited any deficit, it was the 2007 deficit, the last of the Republican budgets. That deficit was the lowest in five years, and the fourth straight decline in deficit spending.  

After January 3, 2007:

      Democrats now controlling Congress took control of spending. Democrats Barney Frank took over the House Financial Services Committee and Chris Dodd took over the Senate Banking Committee. The economic meltdown that happened 15 months later was in what part of the economy?

                            BANKING AND FINANCIAL SERVICES!

      

     The economy collapsed, unemployment soared to a crisis point by the  dumping 5-6 Trillion Dollars of toxic loans from their Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac fiascoes! Then President Bush had asked Congress 17 TIMES  to stop Fannie & Freddie because it was financially risky for the US economy and who fought against reform of Fannie and Freddie? - Obama and the Democrat Congress. It was a reorientation of the party toward Wall Street in 1992, where Clinton, found his chief economic adviser, Robert Rubin, the co-chairman of Goldman Sachs (and a trove of new money for Democratic coffers). Rubin and his protégé, Summers, both served Clinton as Treasury secretary, and both advocated for de-regulation of the financial sector – a policy that caused the 2008 financial meltdown.

      Constitutionally the economy is controlled by the Congress and the party that controlled Congress since January 2007 is the Democrat Party.  Furthermore, the Democrats controlled the budget process for 2008 & 2009 as well as 2010 & 2011 and 2012, 2013, & 2014.

Their actions were NOT a mistake in judgement, it was part of the plan. it was the spark that ignited the fire that would fundamentally change the United States away from it's beginnings into a new entity. 

     We are where we are today due to a controlled, agenda driven by

anti-American Socialism that has taken complete control of the Democratic party. Along with the Leftist owned media(Over 80%+ of all media votes Leftist) which spews constant propaganda that demonizes the majority of American ideals while propagating the Democratic/Socialist view of the world, slowly indoctrinating the population to a new form of corporate government.

       The country is slowly changing as liberties are rarely snatched away overnight. They are often taken slowly—step by step, item by item, one degree of separation at a time. We are witnessing events that are eroding our freedom of speech and religious liberties. Slowly but surely, they are becoming things of the past and as they slip away and as citizens we are doing nothing. The mainstream media parrots the official government line of changing America instead of advocating for those freedoms. They have become the messengers for the Socialist ruling class.

      How long will it take? When will true Americans wake up? When we do we will discover that all of our cherished freedoms have gone down the drain. We will find themselves to be like sheep led to the slaughter. It is then that we will discover that the greatest experiment in human freedom since the Garden of Eden has been lost for good. As we drift away from the ideals of the Founding Fathers towards an unknown fate controlled by the foreign rich of the Left, we can only reminisce about a once great country.

John Quincy Adams on Islam

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      John Quincy Adams had the fortune to be at the birth of our Republic, at it's beginnings and to be tutored at the feet of his father, John Adams, our second President. John Quincy was literally nurtured by his father in the intricacies of the founding of the Republic. John Adams involved his son at an early age in his own activities and travels on behalf of the fledgling nation. John Quincy accompanied his father to France in 1778, became Secretary to the American Minister to Russia, was the Secretary to his father during peace negotiations that ended the American Revolution in 1783, served as U.S. foreign ambassador, both to the Netherlands and later to Portugal, under George Washington, to Prussia under his father’s presidency, and then to Russia and later to England under President James Madison. He served as a U.S. Senator, Secretary of State under President James Monroe, and then as the nation’s sixth President (1825-1829), and finally as a member of the U.S. House of Representatives, where he was a staunch and fervent opponent of slavery.

      The Founders of the American Republic had to be well-studied in the ebb and flow of human history, and the international circumstances and enemies that could potentially impact the newborn United States adversely. They were not of a multi-cultural society. They had not been indoctrinated by the pluralism, “diversity,” and political correctness that now blanket and stifle today's American culture. They had to be vigilant in all things that were evil and alien that could potentially impact the United States adversely and they were not oblivious to and unconcerned about the threat that Islam poses to the American (and Christian) way of life as society is today. In fact, they spoke openly and pointedly about the anti-American, anti-Christian nature of the (so-called) religion of Islam.

      These are the writings of an early President of the United States, John Quincy Adams. After his presidency, but before his election to Congress in 1830, John Quincy penned several essays dealing with one of the many Russo-Turkish Wars. In these essays, we see a cogent, informed portrait of the threat that Islam has posed throughout world history:

      "In the seventh century of the Christian era, a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar, the
Egyptian, (Mohammud) combining the powers of transcendent genius, with the preternatural

energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an impostor, proclaimed himself as a messenger from Heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of the Mosaic law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life, and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust, by adapting all the rewards and sanctions of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE."

       "Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. That war is yet flagrant; nor can it cease but by the extinction of that imposture, which has been permitted by Providence to prolong the degeneracy of man. While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace upon earth, and good will towards men. The hand of Ishmael will be against every man, and every man’s hand against him. It is, indeed, amongst the mysterious dealings of God, that this delusion should have been suffered for so many ages, and during so many generations of human kind, to prevail over the doctrines of the meek and peaceful and benevolent Jesus." (Blunt, 1830, 29:269, capitals in orig.).

      Adams not only documents the violent nature of Islam, in contrast with the peaceful and benevolent thrust of Christianity, he further exposes the mistreatment of women inherent in Islamic doctrine, including the degrading practice of polygamy. He also spoke of the coercive, violent nature of Islam, as well as the Muslim’s right to lie and deceive to advance Islam:

       "The precept of the koran is, perpetual war against all who deny, that Mahomet is the prophet of God. The vanquished may purchase their lives, by the payment of tribute; the victorious may be appeased by a false and delusive promise of peace; and the faithful follower of the prophet, may submit to the imperious necessities of defeat: but the command to propagate the Moslem creed by the sword is always obligatory, when it can be made effective. The commands of the prophet may be performed alike, by fraud, or by force." (Blunt, 29:274).

      A legitimate religion benefits mankind. "The fundamental doctrine of the Christian religion, is the extirpation of hatred from the human heart. It forbids the exercise of it, even towards enemies." John Quincy Adams and the other Founders were forthright in their assessment of the nature and teachings of Islam and the Quran. They realized the danger this cult of Islam is to the world. It is time for this country and the civilized world's political leaders to take a sober look at history and to call this group what it really is and take appropriate action.  Failure to do so will be catastrophic for the United States and all mankind.

False God - False Religion

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      Christians claim Muhammad was a false prophet was he?  Muhammad was born and raised in Mecca, a trading town. Since there wasn't enough trading in his adopted farming town of Medina to feed his growing clan and since he didn't know how to farm, Muhammad took to plundering passing caravans, and proved quite adept at robbery and murder. He had married a dominate strong willed woman, Khadija, whom he was married to for twenty-one years. There are some, during this time, that believed Muhammad was suffering from a type of possession, what is now called schizophrenia. One night, he told his wife Khadija about hearing voices and she told him they must be of an angel and he must be a prophet. By encouraging and interpreting his hallucinations, she was the beginning of Islam.

      With his new found enlightenment and emboldened by his successes, Muhammad then took to plundering towns and massacred the inhabitants of some to make others submit. He even massacred some of those who did submit. For example, when the Jews of Banu Qurayza surrendered to him in 627 AD after a 25 day siege, Muhammad had all of the approximately 900 bound male captives beheaded. He reveled the carnage and murder. Today,  when Muslims kill and plunder, they are following the example and the words of Muhammad to "kill the infidels wherever you find them"  Islam started and grew by the fear of Muhammad’s sword.

      Why do Christians claim Muhammad was a false prophet? When Muhammad conquered the pagan Mecca, it worshipped 360 idols. The four most important among them were the moon god, "Sin", also known as "Hubal", also known as "Allah", and his three daughters: Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Al-Manat.
Muhammad's attempt to impose monotheism by keeping just one god, Allah and ridding the other 359 other idols faced resistance from Meccans who held Allah's three daughters very dear.

      Eager to be accepted as a prophet in his native Mecca, Muhammad initially conceded that Allah approved of Al-Lat, Al-Uzza and Al-Manat. But unable to reconcile three extra goddesses with his declared monotheism, Muhammad later reversed himself, confessing, "I have fabricated things against Allah and have imputed to him words which he has not spoken." (Al Tabari, The History of Al-Tabari, vol. 6, p.111) He felt that Satan had deceived him down this wrong path. Given Allah's true identity, the words of Allah and Satan would not be hard to confuse. Had Muhammad claimed to be a prophet of the God of the Bible, however, someone who fabricates "things against" God is a false prophet whom God said above, "shall die".

       So is Allah the God of the Bible, or is Allah the moon god of ancient pagan Arabia? While "Allah" could refer to God literally, the Allah of Islam is the moon god of ancient pagan Arabia. The Arabic word for "god" is "ilah", while "al" is the Arabic for "the". Therefore, "Allah" combines "al" with "ilah" and removes the "i", to literally means, "the god". "Allah" was the personal name given to the moon god, the highest of the 360 pagan idols worshipped in Mecca, Muhammad's home town.

      What evidence is there that Islam's "Allah" is the pagan moon god of ancient Mecca?
Consider what the pagan Arabians did to worship their moon god, Allah; they prayed while bowing towards K'abah, the "house of Allah" in Mecca that houses a meteorite - a stone from space - several times a day, visited it once a year, and walked around it several times during their visit.

To worship their Allah today:
•  Muslims pray bowing towards the K'abah in Mecca five times a day.
•  About two million Muslims visit Mecca every year and walk around the K'abah (the black cube, which is 40 feet tall, on the right).
•  The Muslim "holy" month of Ramadan starts at the sighting of a new crescent moon.
•  Perched atop mosques across the world is the crescent moon (above), the symbol of Allah whom Muhammad chose as the god of Islam.

      When confronted with the details above, Muslim typically re-assert that "Allah" still means "al" + "ilah" - i.e., "the" + "god" - and is same as the God of the Bible, not the moon god of pagan Mecca. They even point out that Arabic Christian Bibles uses "Allah" to refer to God. The "Allah" in the current Arabic Christian Bibles is literally "the God" and does refer to the God of the Bible. Advise Muslims that if this is really the "Allah" they are worshipping, then they should stop bowing down toward a meteorite five times a day and the crescent moon should neither start their "holy" month of Ramadan nor top their mosques. If the Allah they are worshipping is the God of the Bible, then they should worship Him as the Bible instructs, not the Koran which are the writings of a barbarous, murdering, lunatic.

 False god - False prophet - False religion

Hands Up - Don't Lie

by

       Zeno Potas

      Perhaps it is time we have an honest discussion about race in America. An HONEST discussion, not the distortions that the Leftists want everyone to believe. You read this blog because we have promised you the truth. Are you ready for the truth? These are the facts.

•  Do you know how many blacks were killed by police by gunfire last year? - The number is 123.
•  Do you know how many whites were killed? That number is 326.
•  Police killings of blacks are down 70% in last 50 years.
•  Whites are 63% of the population, and in 2013, whites committed 4,396 murders.
•  Blacks are 13% of the population, and in 2013, blacks committed 5,375 murders.
• Officers were less likely to erroneously shoot unarmed black suspects than they were unarmed whites — 25 times less likely, in fact . (Washington State University Study)
• Officers hesitated significantly longer before shooting armed suspects who were black, compared to armed subjects who were white or Hispanic. (Washington State University Study)

      In just these few set of facts we can see that one side is out of proportion to distortion being broadcast in our slanted news media. Let's pull up a few historical facts about black America.

•  In 1950, female-headed households were 18 percent of the black population. Today it's 70 percent.
•  In 1925 New York City, 85 percent of black households were two-parent households.
• The black illegitimacy rate in 1940 was about 14 percent; black illegitimacy today is over 70 percent. 
•  In Democratic controlled urban areas, it is over 80 percent.

     The major problem in the black community that accounts for so much of the disparity in achievement and criminal behavior is that more than seven in 10 black children are born to single women and will spend much of their lives with no father present. Children are raised with no authority to respect and grow up with a distorted view of life. If we want to have an honest conversation about race, we need to begin here. This is where society's, especially in the black community, future problems begin.

      Another problem in many areas of the country is the Leftist control of our schools. These

Socialist teachers, who stand behind the Democratic party in every election, have driven the black academic achievement gap. Often, black 12th-graders can read, write and deal with scientific and math problems at only the level of white sixth-graders. This doesn't bode well for success in college or passing civil service exams or gaining any meaningful employment in their lifetimes.  By under educating young people it deprives them not only of income but also of work experience, which can be even more valuable. Without the right education, young people will be left out of legal work, and with illegal work  always available, this is just asking for trouble. So is having large numbers of idle young males, under educated, and unable to speak the acceptable English language hanging out together on the streets.

       How much of what we see today can be explained by racial discrimination? Jason Riley, a Wall Street Journal editorial board member and author of "Please Stop Helping Us: How Liberals Make It Harder for Blacks To Succeed," is certainly one man who should be listened to.  Riley's book discusses why these depressing statistics stem from cultural changes that have occurred in the black community and the unintended consequences of liberal efforts to blame everything on poverty and prejudice when it is their own actions to "help the underprivileged" that is the root cause behind America's woes. This is an important question because if we conclude that racial discrimination is the major cause of black problems when it isn't, then effective solutions will be elusive forever and we will continue down the path towards anarchy.

Discussion Without an Agenda - Propaganda Fuels Talk of War

by
       Phillip Todd

  We conclude our interview with guest is Jack Hanick who recently completed the development of a state of the art television network in Moscow, built without government funding. Its evening news program broadcasts to 65 million homes in Russia across eight time zones. Previously Jack was a TV director, where he won the New York Emmy in 1994 for best director. His biography of Desmond Tutu also won a New York Emmy. He is considered an American expert on Russia. (Additional comments by John Pilger.)

PT – You spoke of the media and it's willingness to carry story after story of so-called Russian aggression towards it neighbors - are not the elitists, who own the western media, deliberately pushing the world towards war?

JH - We are moving closer and closer to a real war. Republicans and Democrats talk tough on foreign policy towards Russia. When all politicians are in agreement, there is no discussion of alternative approaches. Any alternative to complete isolation of Russia and a NATO build up on Russia’s borders is a

sign of weakness. Any alternative to this military build up is criticized as “appeasement,” likened to the failed foreign policy of British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain toward Nazi Germany between 1937 and 1938.

JP - The most effective propaganda is found not in the Sun or on Fox News - but beneath a liberal halo. When the New York Times published claims that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, its fake evidence was believed, because it wasn't Fox News; it was the New York Times.

The same is true of the Washington Post and the Guardian, both of which have played a critical role in conditioning their readers to accept a new and dangerous cold war. All three liberal newspapers have misrepresented events in Ukraine as a malign act by Russia - when, in fact, the fascist led coup in Ukraine was the work of the United States, aided by Germany and NATO.

PT – Sanctions are continuously being applied to Russia to bring down the government. Do they think intimidation and isolation will accomplish this without another European war? 

JH - A war with Russia cannot be won economically. Russia has oil and an abundance of natural resources. It occupies the largest landmass in the world. It is growing in its ability to replace goods restricted from the west. The US flexing its military muscle will not solve the problems.

JP - This inversion of reality is so pervasive that Washington's military encirclement and intimidation of Russia is not contentious. It's not even news, but suppressed behind a smear and scare campaign of the kind I grew up with during the first cold war.

Once again, the evil empire is coming to get us, led by another Stalin or, perversely, a new Hitler. Name your demon and let rip.

JH - Sanctions are driving Russia away from the West and toward China. Chinese tourism in Russia is at record levels.

PT –Is a European war inevitable?

JH - This time the war will not be “over there.” The Russian bombers flying off the California coast on July 4 clearly demonstrate this point. Russians understand that the US has not fought a war on its soil since the civil war. If new hostilities start, Russia will not let the war be a proxy war where the US supplies weapons and advisers and lets others do the “boots on the ground” combat. Russia will take the war to the US. Imagine if Canada suddenly aligned itself with Russia or China. The US would surely see that as a threat on its border and act decisively. 

JP - "If you wonder," wrote Robert Parry, "how the world could stumble into WWIII – much as it did into WWI a century ago - all you need to do is look at the madness that has enveloped virtually the entire US political/media structure over Ukraine where a false narrative of white hats versus black hats took hold early and has proved impervious to facts or reason."

PT – The truth is that continuing along this path could truly become a world war in all hemispheres of the globe.

JH - War is not the answer but too often in history becomes the only solution when two sides refuse to see the other’s point of view. Understanding the Russian side and taking their arguments seriously can help prevent serious consequences.

PT – That would be the case for most rational people but it seems that the political elite have dollar signs in their eyes without regard for the consiquences to humanity. Thank you both for your insight into the continuing build up of these winds of war.

A Discussion Without an Agenda - The Media is Contributing to the War Hysteria

by
       Phillip Todd

      Our guest is Jack Hanick recently completed the development of a state of the art television network in Moscow, built without government funding. Its evening news program broadcasts to 65 million homes in Russia across eight time zones. Previously Jack was a TV director, where he won the New York Emmy in 1994 for best director. His biography of Desmond Tutu also won a New York Emmy. He is considered an American expert on Russia. (Additional comments by John Pilger.)

PT - Tell our readers about your recent experiences in Russia.

JH - I moved to Moscow two and a half years ago. I went to Russia to  build a non-government funded news channel with editorial views consistent with the Russian Orthodox Church. I have completed that task and returned to the west.

PT - Everyday we hear in our news media stories of Russian aggression, what is going on there?

JH - America is heading for war with Russia.

JP - The world is facing the prospect of major war, perhaps nuclear war, with the United States clearly determined to isolate and provoke Russia and eventually China.

PT – We are being told that Russia is doing this.

JH - There are two sides to this story. I believe that American and western journalists from all political persuasions are not offering critical analysis.

PT – Is that a polite way of saying we are not being told the truth?

JP - This truth is being turned upside down and inside out by journalists. We have war by media; censorship by media; demonology by media; retribution by media; diversion by media - a surreal assembly line of obedient clichés and false assumptions.

PT – The Russian people, aren't they also are as dis-informed as we are in the west? We are told that they have no free press at all.

JH - Americans believe that Russians are fed propaganda by the state-controlled media. If Russians only could hear the truth, the thinking goes, they would welcome the US position. This is not so. There are more than 300 TV stations available in Moscow. Only 6 are state-controlled. The truth is that Russians prefer hearing the news from the state rather than the Internet or other sources. This is different from almost any other country. It is not North Korea where the news is censored. Each night during the Crimea crisis, anyone could watch CNN or the BBC bash Russia.

JP - Why has so much western journalism succumbed to propaganda? Why are censorship and distortion standard practice? Why is the BBC so often a mouthpiece of rapacious pow York Times and the Washington Post deceive their readers? These are urgent questions.

PT – What is your view on the situation in Ukraine?

JH - With regard to Ukraine, Russia has drawn a red line: It will never allow Ukraine to be part of NATO. Russia sees the US as the aggressor, surrounding Russia with military bases in Eastern Europe at every opportunity since the collapse of the Soviet Union. The US sees Russia as the aggressor against its neighbors. Any small misstep could lead to war. I see both sides of this escalating conflict and unless there is a change in thinking, the result will be catastrophic.

JP - The suppression of the truth about Ukraine is one of the most complete news blackouts I can remember. The biggest Western military build-up in the Caucasus and eastern Europe since world war two is blacked out. Washington's secret aid to Kiev and its neo-Nazi brigades responsible for war crimes against the population of eastern Ukraine is blacked out.

PT – How did we reach this critical point in such a short time?

JH - When I first arrived, the relationship between the US and Russia seemed normal. As an American, my ideas were welcomed, even sought after. Then Russia passed a law that prevented sexual propaganda to minors. This was the start of tensions. The LGBT lobby in the West saw this law as anti-gay. I did not. The law was a direct copy of English law and was intended to prevent pedophilia, not consenting relationships between adults. Gay relations in Russia are not illegal (although not accepted by the majority of the public). Regarding gay protests, they were restricted from view of children. I saw this in the same way that we in America restrict children from seeing “R” rated films. The punishment for breaking this law is a fine of less than $100. Double-parking a car in Moscow carries a heavier fine of $150. Nonetheless the reaction was overwhelming against Russia.

PT – The commentary most in the west heard was very different. One could hear that statement and make the assumption that the gay community is the west, particularly in the United States, could be the spark that drives us to WWIII?  It only took a spark and mis-information to ignite the first world war.

JH -The (gay inspired) boycott of the Sochi Olympics was the West’s way of discrediting Russia. Russia saw this boycott as an aggressive act by the West to interfere with its internal politics and to embarrass Russia. Sochi was for Russians a great source of national pride and had nothing to do with politics. For the West, this was the first step in creating the narrative that Russia was the old repressive Soviet Union and Russia must be stopped.

PT - But Russia today is not the old Soviet Union.

JH -  This is the mistake that will cost America dearly and it is the assumption that Russia has the same ambitions as the Soviet Union. The cold war strategy used against the Soviet Union cannot be repeated with the same result. The Soviet Union was communist and atheistic. Modern Russia has returned to its Christian roots. There is a revival in Russian Orthodoxy with over 25,000 new churches built in Russia after the fall of Communism. On any Sunday, the churches are packed. Over 70% of the population identifies themselves as Orthodox Christians. Combine this religious revival with renewed Nationalism and Russia is growing in self-confidence. The Marxist ideology followed by the Soviet Union was evangelistic. Only when the whole world became communist will Marxist principles be realized. For this reason, the Soviet Union needed to dominate the whole world. For modern Russia, world domination is not its goal. Russia wants to keep its Russian identity and not lose it to outside forces.
JP - We need to look in the mirror. We need to call to account an unaccountable media that services power and a psychosis that threatens world war.

 

Vote the "Right Way", Say the "Right Thing"

by

       Zeno Potas

      In a representative republic, such as our nation's founders attempted to make, individuals who wish to represent the people are to first give those people an honest representation of themselves and what they stand for. Elections are meant to be the democratic portion of government. Once elected, representatives are to follow only their own consciences when voting on proposed legislation. In 21st century America the reality is far different. For decades key votes were commonly decided by the disguised bribery of corporate lobbyists. Today, outcomes are shaped large on how voting motivation will be painted for the public by an agenda-driven media.

      Every member of each chamber of Congress, as well as the president, is acutely aware that the mainstream media holds his/her career in its unforgiving grasp. Vote the "right" way (meaning the desired outcome of those corporate plutocrats who own the media) and one's future is assured." Vote "wrong," or in opposition to the big boys, and, overnight, an honest representative may be remade into demon-of-the-week. Media manipulation is the name of the game and representation of the people is history. Every elected (or hopeful) ear becomes attuned to unelected media agenda "correctness," even beyond the considerable cash lure of interconnected corporate lobbyists. The media maliciously destroys the character of the people's elected representatives if they refuse to cave to the New World Order agenda, thus changing us to a nation governed by an oligarchy rather than law.

      Those in government who lack sincerity in their political ambitions are quick to recognize and exploit this media

manipulation for personal gain. This is especially true when both

are driven by the same agenda. The use of entertainment programs as a way of inserting continous propaganda into the minds of the viewers is the norm in 2015. We, now with our latest information, can visualize Jon Stewart and the administration at their joint script session before the Daily Show's taping. White House proposals are stated to insure some high-sounding benefit for Americans, in this manufactured news program, to sway the viewers opinions to that of the administration. These proposals usually prove to be constitutionally-unlawful with a trend towards a capitalistic Socialist world-government.

      The media lionizes Mr Obama, ignoring, discrediting or minimizing his many apparently criminal, anti-constitutional acts which make the demonized George Bush become to appear saintly in comparison. Big media, owned by big money, keeps Republicans toeing the one-world agenda as witnessed by only lip service to atrocities against the Constitution by this administration that would not stand in generations past.

      So contorted is the political system in Washington that most bills of Congress sport needful sounding titles which have little or no relation to the usually unlawful Orwellian contents. By this subterfuge the controlled lawmakers hope that both the voting public and their one-world benefactors will be appeased. The media, in turn, is happy to repeat good-sounding titles of desired bills while ignoring content. In this manner, the government is erecting piecemeal a comprehensive framework of police-state dictatorship

      This deliberate dishonesty in government betrays our future generations into slavery and can only be countered by continual pressure from the people themselves. Only their demands can force the elected to truly represent the electorate by returning to obedience to the Constitutional law those elected swore to preserve and protect.