To Kill A President

by

       M. Richard Maxson

 

       There was a time, before 2015, when Donald Trump was the toast of the elite. He was a guest at countless Hollywood parties rubbing elbows with the stars who considered him their friend. The same with politicians, especially the Democrats who, Trump was one until 2001, and they still loved being photographed with him as a friend. So, what happened?

           

 

 A brief recall of that facts as we know them:

• During the debates in February of 2016, Donald Trump came out and exposed the Deep State, the U.S. government, as liars in regards to Iraq. Assuming that Hillary Clinton would win, nothing was done about this leak until the race got close which spawned the infamous false statements of 51 intelligence officials. This marked the acceleration of the election interference by them across the board.
  

• After the 2016 election, when Donald Trump won, the next 24 hours were spent with the elite and the state deciding how to stop him at all costs. Assassination WAS discussed at length but due to the residue of their JFK action it was decided that sabotage of the incoming administration and using massive and  constant attacks on him from media and others would neutralize him and his peace policies.

• The sabotage began after a meeting of traitors in the White House which included Mr. Obama, Mr. Biden, Hillary Clinton and others, to set hidden “trip-up bombs” within the government to thwart and delay his administration from changing the status quo. This was done in the period of early November right up to the inauguration in January of 2017.
  

Link: Will Trump Be Assassinated? The Regime's 'Vicious Hatred' For Trump 

• Constant anti Trump media spewing outright lies were and are being allowed to fly as truth destroying the minds of many Americans and dividing them and their families, perhaps forever.

  
  
   
  

   

  
  LINK:Keith Olbermann sparks outrage by saying 'there's always the hope' Trump will be assassinated 

   
  

      Now the situation is different. Many Americans have had their eyes opened and those eyes are focused so pulling another faux election summery is out of the question. 

      Mr. Obama and his traitors still clandestinely control the government. They are once again planning another round of “trip-up bombs” just in case President Trump takes the electoral collage again.

 

Link: Leftists Falsely Suggest Biden Can Assassinate Trump

 

      But they are starting to panic. If it appears they will lose power, maybe assassination will be plausible. It could be a lone gunman. A deranged anti-Trumper with unfortunate case of TDS. That will play with the media fully behind it to, you know, unfortunate but he saved our democracy.

 

Link: Jen Psaki says some Republicans are supporting Trump because ‘maybe he will die’

                 

                      

                   

  

 Link:  Journalists caught on hot mic joking about Trump being assassinated: ‘Like JFK’

 

       For those who maintain the validity of the mainstream narrative that the Obama Administration did not commit any crimes before, during or after the transition of the Trump administration into the White House, I would ask you this simple question: does the mainstream media ever say ‘you don’t have to trust us, look at the evidence yourself and draw your own conclusions’? The answer is no. They do not. By and large they try to assure you that THEY can be trusted, and you shouldn’t bother to do all that investigative work yourself. After all, their information comes from trusted ‘sources’ and well-connected ‘officials.’ You may have noticed that more and more you are not told who these people actually are. There is a reason. The mainstream media is the greatest tool the Deep State has used in the cover-up of high-level crimes.

 Note: the CIA involvement in mainstream media is now well documented and incontestable.

UPDATE: This article was finished yesterday morning. Last night it came true...

President Trump Assassination attempt

 

We the People of the United States

by

       M. Richard Maxson* 

   The United States is living “post-Constitution,” and I urge all Americans to read the text of the Constitution themselves. “We’re literally ignoring the constitutional history and the plain text of the Constitution. I think it’s important for us to actually as citizens, to go look at the Constitution ourselves, and not just listen to the silver tongue rhetoric of the elite. 

      Most people are familiar with the Constitution’s preamble. “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”  

      A lot of people were required to memorize it in school. But while the preamble is arguably the best-known part of the Constitution, it is the least important.

     Like so many other parts of the constitution, many people today believe that the preamble authorizes all kinds of federal power it never authorized in the first place. The opening preamble The Constitution’s grant of essentially unlimited power to very one springs forth in its opening phrases: "WE, THE PEOPLE.

     For all of its poetic beauty and the sweeping principles it highlights, the Constitution’s preamble doesn’t actually do anything. You could cut the preamble completely out of the Constitution and it wouldn’t change the makeup or operation of the federal government one iota. That’s because a preamble doesn’t grant, delegate or restrict any government power.

     In a legal document, a preamble does not carry the force of law. Black’s Law Dictionary describes a preamble this way.

“A clause at the beginning of a constitution or statute explanatory of the reasons for its enactment and the objects sought to be accomplished.” 

    While they do not confer any power or carry legal force, preambles do serve a purpose. They act as “a key to open the mind of the makers.” In other words, the preamble is not a source of substantive rules, but a statement of assumptions and purposes that sheds light on the main body of the document.

      In simplest terms, the preambles serve as a guide on how to read a constitution or a statute. They identify the parties to the legal document, recite crucial facts related to the document and explain its purpose. The Constitution’s preamble serves all three of these purposes.

     While the preamble reveals the “why” of the Constitution — “to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity” — it does not tell us how the new governmental structure will accomplish these goals. 

     And again, I can’t emphasize this enough – while the preamble outlines the broad objectives of the federal government, it does not confer any authority to the government at all.

     The structure of the government and the delegation of powers follow in the various articles of the Constitution. For instance, Article 1 Sec. 8 assigns specific enumerated powers to Congress. Article II delegates specific powers to the president. Article III establishes the authority of the judiciary. Without the delegation of powers that follow, the preamble is nothing but a poetic list of objectives with no mechanism to carry them into effect.

     Many Americans don’t understand this. They believe the preamble empowers the federal government to take any action conceivable to achieve the Constitution’s stated objectives. As a result, they point to it to justify all kinds of unconstitutional federal actions. They believe that the federal government can do anything and everything to “provide for the common defense,” to “promote the general welfare,” or to “secure the blessings of liberty.”

     Conniving politicians take advantage of this ignorance. In fact, politicians began abusing the words of the preamble to justify federal actions almost before the ink was dry on the Constitution. Defenders of the Alien and Sedition Acts appealed to the preamble, claiming it supported federal laws that criminalized criticism of the government, ignored due process, and assumed power over immigration that was not delegated. James Madison dispensed with their arguments in the Report of 1800.

      “They will waste but little time on the attempt to cover the act by the preamble to the constitution; it being contrary to every acknowledged rule of construction, to set up this part of an instrument, in opposition to the plain meaning, expressed in the body of the instrument. A preamble usually contains the general motives or reasons, for the particular regulations or measures which follow it; and is always understood to be explained and limited by them. In the present instance, a contrary interpretation would have the inadmissible effect, of rendering nugatory or improper, every part of the constitution which succeeds the preamble.” [Emphasis added]

   But for the past 100 years, the federal government has rejected the Madisonian concept that it is limited to the 16 discrete powers the Constitution delegates to it, and has claimed its powers are unlimited, subject only to the express prohibitions in the Constitution. Even those prohibitions can be gotten around since government lawyers have persuaded federal courts to rule that Congress can spend tax dollars or borrowed money on any projects it wishes, whether authorized by the Constitution or not. The courts even have authorized Congress to use federal tax dollars to bribe the states into enacting laws that Congress is powerless to enact, and Congress has done so.

     The preamble is like the introduction to a book. It gives you a general idea as to what the book is about. But you would never write a book report just by reading the introduction – that is if you care about getting a decent grade.

     Anybody trying to justify this or that federal action through the words of the preamble almost certainly hopes to expand government power beyond its constitutional bounds. The preamble tells us a little, but it doesn’t reveal a lot. People need to keep those well-known words in their proper context.

 

*With much assistance from  Michael Maharrey

If I Was the Deep State

 by

        Zeno Potas

 

       If I was the Deep State, and I wanted to destroy America, I would rig the election with a puppet candidate, one that was so compromised that they would never say a word about it.

      I would create a false flag that allows for mail in ballots. I would be in charge of the ballot counting machines. I would create a false flag to blame all who question the results of the election.

      If I was the Deep State, I would make sure all the same crimes I ever committed - never happened. I would prosecute anyone that went against me. I would sue and prosecute anyone that spoke up about the fraudulent election. I would use my powers to shut down all your Internet businesses and bankrupt you.

      If I was the Deep State, I would make everyone an example why you should never question a Democrat ever winning an election. I would imprison my foes. I would use my corrupt DAs and blackmailed judges to destroy you. I would prosecute my biggest competition. I would make sure they could never run for office ever again.

      If I was the Deep State, I would convince everyone that Ukraine Nazis were good and women are men. If I was the deep state, I would own every politician that mattered.

      If I was the Deep State, I would push my pedophilia ambitions on you. If I was the Deep State, you would fear to ever resist me. If I was the Deep State, you would wish I was really the devil. If I was the Deep State, I would say mission accomplished.

Progressivism Warps Our Constitution

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      Woodrow Wilson was one of the first politicians to define and aggressively advocate the idea of a living, breathing, Constitution in his book Constitutional Government in the United States, and while stumping on the campaign trail in 1912. By living and breathing, he meant the Constitution was written as a “dynamic” document; flexible, so it can change with the times without a pesky Constitutional amendment.

      So this contract with the American people is flexible. Instead of maintaining a fixed meaning, judges, lawmakers and bureaucrats mold its various clauses and provisions to fit the needs of the day. Wilson stated, “Society is a living organism and must obey the laws of life, not of mechanics(i.e. the Constitution) - it must develop. All that progressives ask or desire is permission..” Many Americans today falsely view the Constitution “is a living, breathing document.” As a result, we live under the largest government in history.

      America’s founding document essentially serves as a contract between the people of the states. Through the Constitution, they formed the Union, set up a general government to administer specific objects and delegated to it specific, enumerated powers.

     Legally, you can’t have a living, breathing contract. Think about it. Would you sign a living, breathing mortgage? Would you enter into a living, breathing employment  contract? Would you sign a living, breathing agreement with a builder to put an addition on your house? No, because you would have no idea what that contract really means. Contractual provisions have a fixed meaning. When you sign a contract, you expect it to remain constant over time. When disagreements come up, both parties argue their position based on how they understood the contract when they signed it. Nobody would accept a any official saying, “Well, I know the contract meant so-and-so, but now it means something different. It’s a living breathing contract.”

      People can only live together and cooperate in a society with an agreed upon, consistently applied set of rules. We call this the “rule of law.” The principle roots itself in the idea that no individual or institution stands above the law, and that rules consistently apply equally to all people in any given situation. Rule of law creates a bulwark against arbitrary power, whether wielded by a totalitarian leader, promoted by mob rule, or exercised by duly elected legislators.

     The rule of law requires consistency. Otherwise, government becomes arbitrary. When the limits on government power become subject to reinterpretation by the government itself, it becomes limitless in power and authority.

      That’s exactly what we have today. The federal government makes up things as it goes along. The feds claim to power to do all kinds of things never authorized by the Constitution, all based on Wilson and his miss-guided ego thinking himself above the people, above the Founders, and above the Constitution itself.

     James Madison asserted in his letter to Henry Lee ,the sixth president of Congress under the Articles of Confederation, “On every question of construction let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed.” In his full letter Madison wasn’t merely making a theoretical observation, when he was actually launching a full attack on what we would now call “living constitutionalism.”

      So we see, this is not a new idea. Anti-originalists will contend that originalism is a creation of modern conservatives. History renders this claim false. What it is to the Constitution is a cancer that is slowly destroying it. It’s time to kill this idea of a living breathing Constitution before it completely kills our Republic.

 

 *      *      *      *      *      *      *      *      *      *      *      *      *

 

The Ashes of a Coup

by

        George Sontag

      Now that we finally have the tapes proving January 6th was not a violent insurrection 

we were told it was. That was a lie and a look in any dictionary would have proven that. 

No, this was a planned event. Planned by the Deep State in conjunction with the 

Democrat Socialists whose plans to restart wars around the globe, for profit, was their 

motivation and with President Trump in office, that could not happen. Let me enlighten

 you on what actually happened that day.

 

      Flashback to January 4th, 2021. Pence promised that he was going to “hear the objections and evidence”, in reference to the massive irregularities and voter fraud in the 2020 election. He would then send it back to the states for re-examination and certification. Pence never got to hear those electors air their objections or evidence. The January 6^th event at the Capitol was the means Pence used to justify NOT giving electors their day  in Congress. Pence claimed the acts by Trump and his supporters were so heinous, that he was just going to certify the election.

 

      Well, now that we have the January 6^th tapes, it is clear this event was facilitated and coordinated by elements in both parties and from within our own government, and the evidence of this was intentionally withheld, and still is, from the American People

in order to continue perpetuating this massive lie.

 

      You witnessed an insurrection on January 6th 2021, but it wasn’t by Trump supporters. 

It was by establishment politicians, elements within the intelligence community, and State-controlled MSM outlets, who coordinated to generate, escalate, and exaggerate

the situation in order to avoid electors airing their legitimate, and now proven truthful, 

objections, in order to certify a stolen election. Three years late, the massive proof of fraud

is now known but is still being suppressed. You and I witnessed treason and a war waged

on the American People and our freedoms.

 

       Joseph Stalin is credited with observing that, "It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes." Over the last two decades the Left has been changing both the rules of our election process and America’s demographics to suit their political agenda and THEIR candidate.

 

      For ruling class politicians to disingenuously act as if they are simple representatives of the people, when they clearly act in the interest of the billion-dollar Leftist oligarchs who finance their political adventurism, reveals a political system that clearly lacks legitimacy. The hijacking of the U.S. levers of power by a handful of elite families and institutions using crony politicians such as the Clinton's, the Obama's and the Biden's is unmistakable.

      Hatred and lies are the first words out of Mr. Biden’s mouth from the bully pulpit of this 

puppet faux leader in every speech he gives. The fighting continues and the cash rolls in so to financially enrich himself and those who have propped him up for this very purpose. This is a war for profit and anyone who gets in their way ends up being attacked and destroyed or dead. Even leaving innocent people to rot in jail for their so-called political crimes.  

 

      That’s what happened on January 6th. It was the latest American coup (The first being JFK). ALL of it was based on a lie. Our nation was stolen from us by corrupt elements within our own government in both parties. All the hatred, discrimination, censorship, and vitriol towards Trump and his supporters, which constitutes half of the country, continues to this day fueled by the Deep States desire to continue on to….WWIII?

A 232 Year History of our Fight Against Islam & Why it is no Longer Taught in our Public Schools

by

       M. Richard Maxson

      

       Most Americans are unaware of the fact that over two

hundred years ago the United States had declared war on Islam.At the height of the 18th century, Muslim pirates (the “Barbary Pirates”) were the terror of the Mediterranean and a large area of the North Atlantic. These extortionists of the high seas represented the North African Islamic nations of Tripoli, Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers - collectively referred to as the Barbary Coast - and presented a dangerous and unprovoked threat to the new American Republic. In July of 1785, Algerian pirates captured American ships and the Dye of Algiers demanded an unheard-of ransom of $60,000. It was a plain and simple case of extortion and Thomas Jefferson was vehemently opposed to any further payments. Instead, he proposed to Congress the formation of a coalition of allied nations who together could force the Islamic states into peace. A disinterested Congress decided to pay the ransom.

       In 1786, Thomas Jefferson and John Adams met with Tripoli’s ambassador to Great Britain to ask by what right his nation attacked American ships and enslaved American citizens, and why Muslims held so much hostility towards America, a nation with which they had no previous contacts.

       The two future presidents reported that Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdul Rahman Adja had answered that Islam “was founded on the Laws of their Prophet, that it was written in their Quran that all nations who would not acknowledge their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Musselman (Muslim) who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

       Despite this stunning admission of premeditated violence on non-Muslim nations, as well as the objections of many notable American leaders, including George Washington, who warned that caving in was both wrong and would only further embolden the enemy, for the following fifteen years, the American government paid the Muslims millions of dollars for the safe passage of American ships or the return of American hostages. The payments in ransom and tribute amounted to over 20 percent of the United States government annual revenues in 1800.

       Jefferson was disgusted. Shortly after his being sworn in as the third President of the United States in 1801, the Pasha of Tripoli sent him a note demanding the immediate payment of $225,000 plus $25,000 a year for every year forthcoming.

                                                    That changed everything.

       Jefferson let the Pasha know, in no uncertain terms, what he could do with his demand. The Pasha responded by cutting down the flagpole at the American consulate and declared war on the United States. Tunis, Morocco, and Algiers immediately followed suit.

       Jefferson, until now, had been against America raising a naval force for anything beyond coastal defense, but, having watched his nation be cowed by Islamic thuggery for long enough decided that it was finally time to meet force with force.

       He dispatched a squadron of frigates to the Mediterranean and taught the Muslim nations of the Barbary Coast a lesson he hoped they would never forget. Congress authorized Jefferson to empower U.S. ships to seize all vessels and goods of the Pasha of Tripoli and to “cause to be done all other acts of precaution or hostility as the state of war would justify”.

       When Algiers and Tunis, who were both accustomed to American cowardice and acquiescence saw the newly independent United States had both the will and the right to strike back, they quickly abandoned their allegiance to Tripoli.

       The war with Tripoli lasted for four more years and raged up again in 1815. The bravery of the U.S. Marine Corps in these wars led to the line “to the shores of Tripoli” in the Marine Hymn, and they would forever be known as “leathernecks” for the leather collars of their uniforms, designed to prevent their heads from being cut off by the Muslim scimitars when boarding enemy ships.

       Islam, and what its Barbary followers justified doing in the name of their prophet and their god disturbed Jefferson quite deeply. America had a tradition of religious tolerance. In fact, Jefferson, himself, had co-authored the Virginia Statute for Religious Freedom, but fundamentalist Islam was like no other religion the world had ever seen.

       It is not a true religion, it is a political system based

on male supremacy, whose so-called holy book not only condoned but mandated violence against unbelievers. This was unacceptable to Jefferson. His greatest fear was that someday this Islam would return and pose an even greater threat to the United States.

       This should concern every American. That Muslims have brought about women-only classes and swimming times in America at taxpayer-funded universities and public pools; that Christians, Jews, and Hindus have been banned from serving on juries where Muslim defendants are being judged; Piggy banks and Porky Pig tissue dispensers have been banned from workplaces because they offend Islamist sensibilities; ice cream has been discontinued at certain Burger King locations because the picture on the wrapper looks similar to the Arabic script for Allah; public schools are pulling pork from their menus; on and on and on and on…

       It’s death by a thousand cuts, or inch-by-inch as some refer to it, and most Americans have no idea that this battle is being waged every day across America. By not fighting back, by allowing groups to obfuscate what is really happening, and not insisting that the Islamists adapt to our culture, the United States is cutting its own throat with a politically correct knife and helping to further the Islamists’ agenda.

       Sadly, it appears that today America’s leaders would rather be politically correct than admit reality.

The Next Election Could Get Dangerous

By

        M. Richard Maxson 

      With each passing day, it is becoming increasingly apparent that the two biggest blemishes recently on America as a great and free nation are the stolen presidential election of 2020, and the subsequent incarceration of those patriots who exercised their guaranteed First Amendment right to free speech to contest it. The release of more video and cell phone tapes from January 6 by new House Speaker Mike Johnson shows further evidence of a setup by the Feds and that their so-called insurrection was staged. It was staged to force certification of the vote and to stop ANY conversation of illegitimacy. 

      All of the J6 Committee interview tapes are suddenly missing giving further credence that there WAS a conspiracy, by the Democrat party aligned with Deep state officials, to stop the President from contesting the obviously fraudulent election. Now that we have the tapes proving January 6th was not the violent insurrection we were told it was, let me enlighten you on what ACTUALLY happened that day.  

     Flashback to January 4th, 2021. Pence promised that he was going to “hear the objections and evidence”, in reference to the massive irregularities and voter fraud in the 2020 election. House leader, Nancy Pelosi, knew that a halt in the proceedings would lead to an investigation. And an investigation would lead to those questions being covered, albeit reluctantly, by the entire mainstream media. What actually transpired over the three additional days of counting in the 2020 Election would be exposed. And the narrative of the most secure election in American history would crumble in front of the                                              eyes of everybody in this country and across the globe.

       Pence never got to hear those electors air their objections or evidence. The January 6^th event at the Capitol was the means Pence used to justify NOT giving electors their day in Congress. Pence claimed the acts by Trump and his supporters were so heinous, that he was just going to certify the election the next day.  

      Well, now that we have the January 6^th tapes of the capitol, it is clear this event was facilitated and coordinated by elements within our own government, and the evidence of this was intentionally withheld from the American People in order to continue perpetuating this massive lie.  

      The fact that all of the J6 Committee interview tapes are suddenly missing* giving further credence that there WAS a conspiracy, by the Democrat party aligned with Deep state officials, to stop the President from contesting the obviously fraudulent election. The election tampering advanced the Left’s directive of “fundamental transformation” of the country, which included imprisonment without bail or trial of those with whom the tyrannical administration disagreed. You witnessed an insurrection on January 6th 2021, but it wasn’t by Trump supporters. It was by establishment politicians, elements within the intelligence community, and State-controlled MSM outlets, who coordinated to generate, escalate, and exaggerate the situation in order to avoid electors airing their objections, in order to certify a stolen election. You witnessed treason and war waged on the American People. You witnessed a second coup in the United States. The first being the murder of JFK. 

       That’s what happened on January 6th. Our nation was stolen from us by corrupt elements within our own government. And all the hatred, discrimination, censorship, and vitriol towards Trump supporters, ALL of it was based on a lie. They created a web of lies leaving innocent people to rot in jail for standing up for America.

 

*All J6 Witness Video Depositions Have Mysteriously Vanished