The Founding Fathers on Immigration

by

      George Sontag

     Here are just a couple of facts about immigration and immigrants in this country:

• Most of the crimes in Texas, California, and Arizona are federal crimes, connected to illegal aliens.

• 27 percent of all Californians were not born in the United States. More than 40 million foreign-born immigrants currently reside in the U.S. -- the highest number in the nation's history.

• The Social Security Administration has told Congress that more than half a million illegal immigrants have received new Social Security numbers, under President Barack Obama’s 2012 executive action allowing younger immigrants to stay in the United States and work. Low-income immigrants with no net tax liability could gain as much as $3 in Social Security benefits for every $1 they pay into the system, which means Americans will now be subsidizing these immigrants.

      Our founders, asserted their concerns publicly and routinely about the effects of indiscriminate mass immigration. They made it clear that the purpose of allowing foreigners into our fledgling nation was not, as it is today, to recruit millions of new voters or to secure permanent ruling majorities for their political parties. It was to preserve, protect and enhance the republic they put their lives on the line to establish.

      In a 1790 House debate on naturalization, James Madison opined: "It is no doubt very desirable that we should hold out as many inducements as possible for the worthy part of mankind to come and settle amongst us, and throw their fortunes into a common lot with ours. But why is this desirable? It is to increase the wealth and strength of the community; and those who acquire the rights of citizenship, without adding to the strength or

wealth of the community are not the people we are in want of."

      This is a far cry from the rhetoric heard today from the left. Madison argued plainly that America should welcome the immigrant who could assimilate, but exclude the immigrant who could not readily "incorporate himself into our society." It was not because "diversity" is our greatest value, not because big business needed cheap labor, as Madison asserted, "Not merely to swell the catalogue of people."

 

      George Washington concurred in a letter to John Adams, similarly emphasized that immigrants should be absorbed into American life so that "by an intermixture

with our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our customs, measures, laws: in a word soon become one people." That is as relevant as ever today because that is not happening. We are allowing cultures and groups to keep their own beliefs and customs, some which are repugnant and contrary to what is American. This is causing civil unrest within the country.

      Alexander Hamilton, wrote in 1802: "The safety of a republic depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on a uniformity of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from foreign bias and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost invariably be found to be closely connected with birth, education and family." Hamilton further warned that "The United States have already felt the evils of incorporating a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in different classes different predilections in favor of particular foreign nations, and antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the community and to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the interests of our own country in favor of another." These words clearly were very much against what is now called 'globalism."

 

      He predicted, correctly, that "The permanent effect of such a policy will be, that in times of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men, of whom there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will weaken the strength of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting an invader."

      The survival of the American Republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon "the preservation of a national spirit and a national character." He asserted, "To admit foreigners indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot in our country would be nothing less than to admit the Trojan horse into the citadel of our liberty and sovereignty. While billions of immigrants may benefit by moving to this country, this nation state has only one responsibility. We must decide if such an admission complies with our law and serves our national interest."

 

The Courts - The Constitution - The Threat

by

       M. Richard Maxson

         with comments from Christopher Scalia

      To complete the “fundamental changing of America” the plan was set. After years of ignoring the Constitution (because it is an obsolete document) the end game was to put Hillary Clinton in the White House and begin replacing Supreme Court justices that were originalists with left-leaning activist judges. The lower courts were already teaming with these appointees. Their campaigns financed by money from those who do not like the current United States and it's laws. Changing, restricting, and replacing the Constitution is the end game.

  

      That all came to a crashing halt with the election of 2016. The rage that came out of the Left was and still is deafening. President Trump has now appointed two Justices and the Left is doing their best to keep Justice Ginsberg healthy until they can regain power and get the ball rolling again. They pulled every dirty trick they could think of and showed true Americans just how disgusting their political leadership could be. Justice Kavanaugh was confirmed yet the Left, soon to take control of the House, has stated they will continue to go after him via impeachment. They will go to any means to get the Supreme Court stacked with anti-constitutionalists.

      The Democratic party's main supporter does not sit still. He went to plan B. The logic is that the district attorneys are the ones who decide which cases to prosecute and bring before the courts – or not. Since they cannot yet control the courts, they can control what the courts decide. Buried in the MSM are headlines like these:

• Soros put nearly $1.7 million in Philly DA’s race

• Billionaire Soros Pumps $400K Into San Diego DA’s Race

• Billionaire George Soros Pours Money Into Alameda County District Attorney's Race

• Soros buys another district attorney race, this time in Texas

      This should terrify every American patriot. Chief Justice Antonin Scalia was a champion of the Constitution. He has gone and can no longer defend his country but his son has something to say about the state of our nation. Here are his thoughts:

      “Although I don’t think my father (or anyone) could have predicted the twists and turns of the past several weeks, I don’t think he would have been shocked by the no-holds-barred fight over a Supreme Court vacancy, either. He long ago warned Americans about the excessive intrusion of politics into the judicial appointment process. And he explained that a large share of the blame belongs to the justices themselves.”

      “My father believed that a major reason the judicial confirmation process has become so heated is that federal judges too often exceed the role envisioned by our nation’s founders and usurp the power of elected representatives. Alexander Hamilton famously argued “that the judiciary is beyond comparison the weakest of the three departments of power” and that “the general liberty of the people can never be endangered from” the judicial branch. But Hamilton qualified that claim. He said it would only be true as long as “the judiciary remains truly distinct from both the legislature and the Executive.” Hamilton agreed with the French political philosopher Montesquieu, who warned that “there is no liberty, if the power of judging be not separated from the legislative and executive powers.”

      “Maintaining that separation means limiting the role of judges. My father explained that for most of American history, Supreme Court justices recognized that the meaning of legal texts – including the Constitution – did not change. Judges understood that their job was to interpret that original meaning – referring to tradition, history and precedent when necessary. When dealing with laws and statutes, this approach is known as textualism; in reference to the Constitution, it is called originalism.”

      “But over the course of 20th century, judges began to think of the Constitution as a “living document” whose meaning changed with the times. That may seem like a reasonable idea at first; after all, the Constitution was written in 1787 and a nation’s interests and priorities can change dramatically over generations. Shouldn’t the Constitution keep up with the times? In fact, the Constitution establishes democratic processes, both in the states and in Congress, with the flexibility necessary to adapt to changing circumstances. This can happen through new laws and through constitutional amendments. That is, for example, how women earned the right to vote: not by judicial decree, but through the 19^th Amendment.”

      “On the other hand, if the Constitution is a living document, consider who ends up determining its new meaning: unelected judges with lifetime appointments – men and women who are intentionally protected from the will of voters at the ballot box. As a result, many debates and compromises that should have occurred in the political realm have been short-circuited by the judicial branch for decades.”

      “A freedom-loving people respectful of the rule of law may be expected to let lawyers decide what a constitutional text means; but they cannot be expected to let lawyers decide what a Constitution ought to say,” my father said. Or as he put it in another speech, “no court can expect to remain immune from severe political pressure ... if it assumes the role of inventing solutions for social problems instead of merely applying those solutions prescribed in democratically adopted statutory or constitutional text.”

      “One way to help make our judicial confirmation battles less polarizing, then, would be for judges to return to the more limited role they had held for most of our nation’s history: applying laws and statutes according to their text and interpreting the Constitution according to its original public meaning, using history, tradition and precedent as guides.”

      “This change in perspective is long overdue, but it will not happen overnight. Right now, it is primarily only Republicans who see the value in originalist judges like Justice Kavanaugh – and we saw the lengths to which Democrats fought his confirmation.”

      Constitutionalists know that federal judges have been increasingly usurping power from the Executive branch. Too many judges believe it is their right, their duty, to act upon their sympathies and policy preferences This judicial activism is a threat to our representative government and the liberty it secures.

Activist advocates want judges who will do for them what they have been unable to achieve at the ballot box. A judge can have personal opinions on whether a government policy is or isn’t heartless but they should decide legal questions based on the law and the facts—not their policy preferences.

The Democratic Party in Florida - Gross Incompetence or Attempted Election Fraud - Again?

By

      Zeno Potas

       Here we go again as the Democratic party in Florida attempts to flip a decision by the electorate that they don't want disenfranchising the voters of the state of Florida and the nation. “We think it is a sign of desperation and goes to demonstrate the tactics that the Democrats, especially the Florida Democratic Party will resort to to steal this election from the rightful winners,” stated Michael Barnett, chairman of the Palm Beach County Republican Party.

      This is not the first time these Democratic controlled counties have been accused of fraud. It is not the second time, nor the third, it has been going on for almost three decades. It has the real appearance of the Democratic National party attempting to get Florida into the “blue” column by hook or crook. They believe that by being successful at this task they would never again lose national elections via the electoral collage.

      It's not difficult to see that something isn't right here. Counties in the panhandle, devastated by a massive hurricane were still able to get their vote totals in on time, yet......these two counties, in every election in recent memory, - can't get it done? There are no hanging chads this time to blame it on. County officials blatantly disregarded the Florida law requiring that all vote-by-mail and absentee ballots be accounted for within 30 minutes of the polls closing.

       There are other campaign laws that the Democratic party seems to forget every two years. Lawyers for the Florida Democratic gubernatorial and Senate candidates objected Friday to the rejection of a provisional ballot cast by a noncitizens. They were rebuffed by their own peers. “Noncitizens cannot vote in U.S. elections," Marc Elias, recount attorney for the Nelson campaign, said in a statement. “Not a U.S. citizen, not counted.” said Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher. “It’s shameful, there’s no excuse for objecting to the rejection of a non-U.S. citizen vote, but this is just one example of the shenanigans and corruption we’ve seen from the Democrats in Florida for so many years. We will not let them steal this election from us,” stated Michael Barnett.

     Then on Friday, the Miami Herald reported that there were invalid ballots mixed in with about 200 valid ones, but not solution was immediately found for the problem. The error was found after Brenda Snipes, a Broward County official who has a long history of controversies involving vote counting, agreed to present 205 provisional ballots to the county’s canvassing board for inspection.

      In addition Supervisor of Elections Snipes said Tuesday night that 634,000 votes had been cast in the county. But, mysteriously by Thursday night, Snipes was claiming 712,840 ballots had been cast. Though the county’s voting locations closed at 7 p.m. Tuesday, Snipes said Friday that she still didn’t know how many ballots remain to be processed. Nor could she say how many provisional, military or mismarked ballots she had in her possession. The effect of these newly discovered votes that inexplicably appeared long after they should have been counted shrunk the leads of Republicans Gov. Rick Scott in the Senate race and former U.S. Rep. Ron DeSantis in the gubernatorial contest triggering a recount. 
 
     Democratic controlled Broward county has a long list of violations just in the last few years. In 2012 Snipes was criticized for absentee ballots that never arrived, balky scanners that didn’t work, slow reporting and mounds of ballots that showed up long after Election Day.

      In 2014 Snipes demonstrated such incompetence that even fellow Democrats complained her office made it difficult for people to vote.

      In 2016 Snipes allowed her employees to campaign on county time, violated state law by posting election results half an hour before the polls closed and was sued for leaving amendments off the ballots.

     A judge also ruled that Snipes’ office violated state and federal laws by illegally destroying ballots. But the ruling regarding her action illegally obliterating evidence two years ago did not come down until this year.

And there’s more.
     In 2017, accusations of ballot stuffing swirled around Snipes’ office during local elections. She even admitted that ineligible voters who were on the rolls and had voted.

      This year Snipes has drawn more fire. It was revealed that her office broke Florida law earlier this election season by opening ballots in private without observers present.

      Then after people complained they didn’t get their absentee ballots, it turned out that Snipes failed to notify some voters that their right to cast an absentee ballot had expired. She blamed it on not having enough funds to mail notifications. Maybe that was because she wasted her budget by sending some voters ballots with duplicate pages.

      This may all be rank incompetence, but perhaps these actions by two Democratic election officials are a smokescreen for something worse – a deliberate attempt to overturn the Florida election results.

      It appears that the their corruption still continues. In the election of 2016, Republican poll watchers complained that staff was opening absentee ballots in private, thereby making it impossible for groups to question whether ballots were cast, according to Politico. The GOP sued in 2017 to make sure Election Supervisor Brenda Snipes followed the law this time. Damn the law, this week Snipes refused to allow Republican officials to inspect all ballots before they are submitted to the Canvassing Board. And she refused other requests for public records that should be available under Florida’s expansive “sunshine laws,” drawing a sharp rebuke from a judge late Friday afternoon.

      In response to Republican lawsuits, Florida state Judge Carol-Lisa Phillips ruled Friday that “there has been a violation of the Florida constitution” and the state’s public records act by Broward County officials. The judge sided with Scott and ordered that Republicans should be granted “immediate access” to information they have requested about ballots Broward County.

      There are also problems in Democrat controlled Palm Beach County. On Wednesday morning, Palm Beach County Supervisor of Elections Susan Bucher stopped filing updates of the vote count with the Florida Department of State as required by law. The law mandates that she report every 45 minutes until all the election results are in. Instead, Bucher dropped news of the 15,000 surprise ballots she’s counted. 
 
      Besides ignoring state law, Bucher is also refusing to allow designated official political party representatives into the ballot counting area. She’s kept them isolated behind a glass wall where they can’t see and hear all that’s going on – yet another violation of Florida election law.

      Then, breaking from normal practice, the Palm Beach County elections supervisor banned media from filming and photographing the high-profile midterm election ballot review process. Tensions flared and Bucher threatened to have camera operators and newspaper reporters arrested for filming ballot tabulation. This prompted NBC attorney Karen Williams to interrupt the three member canvassing board Friday afternoon to object to the camera ban “This meeting is illegal,” Williams said, before a heated exchange with Bucher’s attorney, Natalie Kato. 
 

      Despite objections from reporters, the canvassing board insisted that the meeting not be filmed or photographed. Five Palm Beach County Sheriff’s deputies watched the meeting both from inside the room and behind the glass windows lead inside. Under threat of arrest and removal from the meeting, reporters shut down their cameras. 

 
      Even more troubling, Bucher has copied vote-by-mail ballots that she claims are damaged, but without allowing witnesses to observe the process as required by Florida law. In fact, she explicitly denied requests for witnesses to see her staff at work. As election supervisor, Bucher also assumed the power to determine what constitutes a “valid vote.” Under Florida law, she doesn’t have that authority. She can only refer questionable ballots to the county’s bipartisan Canvassing Board. This is not the first time these two Board of Election supervisors have shown contempt for their official responsibilities under Florida law, especially Snipes in Broward County.

     The facts are that local Democratic officials in Broward and Palm Beach counties in Florida are recklessly violating state law in what may be an attempt to overturn the results of Tuesday’s midterm elections for governor and the U.S. Senate in the Sunshine State. Republicans have questioned the handling of the votes and have pointed to past controversies in these two counties in particular as evidence that voter fraud may be underway. In addition, at least one ballot box for provisional votes was left unattended at a polling place – a school where it was discovered days after the election. The box was locked but not sealed, and could have been tampered with or stuffed. Could there be others?

      “For everyone concerned about ‘election meddling,’ Broward County seems to be full of it. And for those worried about voter suppression, that’s taking place in liberal Broward County, too. The will of the people is being subverted by Snipes’ illegal practices and sadly, the fate of Florida hangs in the balance of Brenda Snipes’ circus.” - Richard DeNapoli, GOP State Committeeman from Broward County, via a piece for the Washington Examiner.

      This looks like a repeat of the actions in Florida in the 2000 presidential election, when Democratic officials ignored state election laws – and were slapped down by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 7-2 decision. There may be a basis for the U.S. Justice Department to intervene and investigate this troubling situation in Broward and Palm Beach counties to answer the obvious question:
Are Democratic elections officials deliberately breaking the law and playing games to delay everything just long enough so they can create just the number of ballots needed to overturn the election results? Let’s hope it’s not too late and that any election fraud in Broward and Palm Beach counties in Florida can be reversed.

             

             BREAKING NEWS 

Affidavit filed by Broward Election’s employee provides eye witness account of Elections staff filling in blank ballots. When this was reported the employee was fired and told not to come back.

These two counties have been screwing up Florida elections for 30 years. First it was the hanging chads and now,with electronic machines, they still can't give us a count on time according to law. This is either CONTINUOUS GROSS INCOMPETENCE OR OUTRIGHT FRAUD. I believe it's the later.

- M. Richard Maxson

Important Facts in an Important Election

By

       George Sontag

      Socialist Billionaire George Soros has become increasingly influential in American elections and American society. His hold over the American political left is especially strong. His organizations and shell companies are the largest donors to the Democratic party. As a result, he, indirectly of course, wields enormous influence and any Democratic politicians that don’t support or express “progressive narrative” either receive cuts to their funding or are targeted by the media -his media? Soros is the man responsible for the

constant attacks on conservative constitutionalists in the media. In the recent past George Soros, along with his puppet, Mr. Obama, went a long way to “fundamentally change America” from a Constitutional Republic to a Socialist state without borders. His financing, through his organizations, of the current migrant caravans are part of a stepped-up attack on Republican ideals and to try to swing the 2018 election back to the left.

       Soros has been accused of sowing political upheaval to advance a personal agenda. Critics around the world, including in the U.S. and in Soros’ homeland of Hungary, say the liberal financier often masquerades as a humanitarian while manipulating the political landscape. He is a key member of the shadow government disguised as a philanthropic billionaire. His donations seem heartfelt and meaningful, but if you look a little closer, you’ll realize that every donation he makes has an ulterior motive behind it, helping to secure his control over the political landscape and in turn profit from it. He has donated money to a number of “left” groups such as the Tides Foundation, Center for American Progress, and the Democracy Alliance to influence campaign finance laws.

      Soros also wants America to become subservient to international bodies. He wants more power for groups such as the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, even while saying the U.S. role in the IMF should be “downsized.” In 1998, he wrote: “Insofar as there are collective interests that transcend state boundaries, the sovereignty of states must be subordinated to international law and international institutions.”


      His control of the U.S. media by coercion through

funding is massive. Soros' influence doesn't just include connections to top mainstream news organizations such as NBC, ABC, The New York Times and Washington Post. It's bought him connections to the underpinnings of the news business. The Columbia Journalism Review, which bills itself as "a watchdog and a friend of the press in all its forms," lists several investigative reporting projects funded by one of Soros foundations. It's a strategy that Soros has been deploying extensively in media both in the United States and abroad. Since 2003, Soros has spent more than $48 million funding media properties, including the infrastructure of news - journalism schools, investigative journalism and even industry organizations. And that number is an understatement. It is gleaned from tax forms, news stories and reporting. But Soros funds foundations that fund other foundations in turn, like the Tides Foundation, which then make their own donations. A complete accounting is almost impossible because a media component is part of so many Soros-funded operations. Just trying to follow the Soros money trail almost requires your own personal accountant.

      Don’t Ignore Soros Connections to Major News Events. It’s easy to see George Soros’s imprint on most major American left-wing organizations. His financing of Black Lives Matter, The Ferguson protest, Antifa, etc, etc, are well documented. All you have to do is look at their financial forms. George Soros aids hundreds of left-wing groups in America each year under the auspices of his Open Society Foundations. In just 10 years, Soros has given more than $550 million to liberal organizations in the United States.

      Newspaper front pages are filled with protests, complaints and supposedly grassroots initiatives that are easily tied to Soros – through the Center of American Progress and other entities he funds. But, in the main stream media, that connection is almost never made made. Journalists ignore obvious funding connections and sometimes don’t even check connections openly made on organizational websites. It’s the job of news to show when organizations are blatantly working together toward an end and to show the obvious ties these groups might share. It is the deliberate omissions of the main stream media that we have over the years called propaganda and that President Trump calls “fake news” that is bringing disharmony to the nation. This election is crucial to America. It's not Democrat vs Republican this time - it's America vs Evil.

“Americans do not understand the extent to which Soros  fuels this anti-constitutional, anti-American agenda.”

- J. Christian Adams, former DOJ attorney

Politicians

Guest Column

Forward by,

       M. Richard Maxson

      Charley Reese (January 29, 1937 – May 21, 2013) was an American syndicated columnist. Reese was a conservative with many libertarian views. He was unhappy with both major parties and switched multiple times. His displeasure with politicians can be summed up in one of his quotes, “...most politicians today are not human beings. You want to pry open their mouths and shout into the darkness, 'Hello! Is there a human being in there?' Buried under all that lust for office, all that fear of offending a contributor? I know there must be.” His common sense columns were praised by all and in 1999, when C-SPAN viewers were asked to vote for their favorite columnist, Reese finished in first place. Here, over 30 years later, is one of his best that still stands the test of time.

545 vs. 300,000,000 People

       By Charlie Reese

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

Have you ever wondered, if both the Democrats and the Republicans are against deficits, WHY do we have deficits?

Have you ever wondered, if all the politicians are against inflation and high taxes, WHY do we have inflation and high taxes?

You and I don't propose a federal budget. The President does.

You and I don't have the Constitutional authority to vote on appropriations. The House of Representatives does.

You and I don't write the tax code, Congress does.

You and I don't set fiscal policy, Congress does.

You and I don't control monetary policy, the Federal Reserve Bank does.

One hundred senators, 435 congressmen, one President, and nine Supreme Court justices equates to 545 human beings out of the 300 million are directly, legally, morally, and individually responsible for the domestic problems that plague this country.

I excluded the members of the Federal Reserve Board because that problem was created by the Congress. In 1913, Congress delegated its Constitutional duty to provide a sound currency to a federally chartered, but private, central bank.

I excluded all the special interests and lobbyists for a sound reason. They have no legal authority. They have no ability to coerce a senator, a congressman, or a President to do one cotton-picking thing. I don't care if they offer a politician $1 million dollars in cash. The politician has the power to accept or reject it. No matter what the lobbyist promises, it is the legislator's responsibility to determine how he votes.

Those 545 human beings spend much of their energy convincing you that what they did is not their fault. They cooperate in this common con regardless of party.

What separates a politician from a normal human being is an excessive amount of gall. No normal human being would have the gall of a Speaker, who stood up and criticized the President for creating deficits.. ( The President can only propose a budget. He cannot force the Congress to accept it.)

The Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land, gives sole responsibility to the House of Representatives for originating and approving appropriations and taxes. The leader of the majority party and fellow House members, not the President, can approve any budget they want.  If the President vetoes it, they can pass it over his veto if they agree to.

It seems inconceivable to me that a nation of 300 million cannot replace 545 people who stand convicted -- by present facts -- of incompetence and irresponsibility. I can't think of a single domestic problem that is not traceable directly to those 545 people. When you fully grasp the plain truth that 545 people exercise the power of the federal government, then it must follow that what exists is what they want to exist.

If the tax code is unfair, it's because they want it unfair.

If the budget is in the red, it's because they want it in the red.

If the Army & Marines are in Iraq and Afghanistan it's because they want them in Iraq and Afghanistan ..

If they do not receive social security but are on an elite retirement plan not available to the people, it's because they want it that way.

There are no insoluble government problems.

Do not let these 545 people shift the blame to bureaucrats, whom they hire and whose jobs they can abolish; to lobbyists, whose gifts and advice they can reject; to regulators, to whom they give the power to regulate and from whom they can take this power.
Above all, do not let them con you into the belief that there exists disembodied mystical forces like "the economy," "inflation," or "politics" that prevent them from doing what they take an oath to do.

Those 545 people, and they alone, are responsible. They, and they alone, have the power.

They, and they alone, should be held accountable by the people who are their bosses. Provided the voters have the gumption to manage their own employees... We should vote all of them out of office and clean up their mess!

Charlie Reese is a former columnist of the Orlando Sentinel Newspaper.

What you do with this article now that you have read it... is up to you. This might be funny if it weren't so true.
Be sure to read all the way to the end:

Tax his land,
Tax his bed,
Tax the table,
At which he's fed.

Tax his tractor,
Tax his mule,
Teach him taxes
Are the rule.

Tax his work,
Tax his pay,
He works for
peanuts anyway!

Tax his cow,
Tax his goat,
Tax his pants,
Tax his coat.

Tax his ties,
Tax his shirt,
Tax his work,
Tax his dirt.

Tax his tobacco,
Tax his drink,
Tax him if he
Tries to think.

Tax his cigars,
Tax his beers,
If he cries
Tax his tears.

Tax his car,
Tax his gas,
Find other ways
To tax his ass.

Tax all he has
Then let him know
That you won't be done
Till he has no dough.

When he screams and hollers;
Then tax him some more,
Tax him till
He's good and sore.

Then tax his coffin,
Tax his grave,
Tax the sod in
Which he's laid...

Put these words
Upon his tomb,
'Taxes drove me
to my doom...'

When he's gone,
Do not relax,
Its time to apply
The inheritance tax.
Accounts Receivable Tax
Building Permit Tax
CDL license Tax
Cigarette Tax
Corporate Income Tax
Dog License Tax
Excise Taxes
Federal Income Tax
Federal Unemployment Tax (FUTA)
Fishing License Tax
Food License Tax
Fuel Permit Tax
Gasoline Tax (currently 44.75 cents per gallon)
Gross Receipts Tax
Hunting License Tax
Inheritance Tax
Inventory Tax
IRS Interest Charges IRS Penalties (tax on top of tax)
Liquor Tax
Luxury Taxes
Marriage License Tax
Medicare Tax
Personal Property Tax
Property Tax
Real Estate Tax
Service Charge Tax
Social Security Tax
Road Usage Tax
Recreational Vehicle Tax
Sales Tax
School Tax
State Income Tax
State Unemployment Tax (SUTA)
Telephone Federal Excise Tax
Telephone Federal Universal Service Fee Tax
Telephone Federal, State and Local Surcharge Taxes
Telephone Minimum Usage Surcharge Tax
Telephone Recurring and Nonrecurring Charges Tax
Telephone State and Local Tax
Telephone Usage Charge Tax
Utility Taxes
Vehicle License Registration Tax
Vehicle Sales Tax
Watercraft Registration Tax
Well Permit Tax
Workers Compensation Tax

STILL THINK THIS IS FUNNY?
Not one of these taxes existed 100 years ago, & our nation was the most prosperous in the world. We had absolutely no national debt, had the largest middle class in the world, and Mom stayed home to raise the kids.

What in the heck happened? Can you spell 'politicians?'
I hope this goes around THE USA at least 545 times!!! YOU can help it get there!!!

GO AHEAD. . . BE AN AMERICAN!!!

The Progressives Democratic Socialism - A Disaster

By

       Zeno Potas

      Socialism is something many Americans never thought they would ever see in this country. Just the thought of that anti-Constituional ideology was abhorrent to most. For the last one hundred years, in the west, the dogma was cloaked with the title “progressivism” to be more palatable. Now, the slightly different factions live in the Democratic party and are right out there for all to see. Progressives, Socialists, Democratic Socialists, and more.

      According to Karl Marx, Socialism, is the transition stage to Communism. Communist subversion holds that society must first be destabilized (by polarization) and brought to a state of crisis before it can be “normalized” under the new system. Communism is created step-by-step through the gradual destruction of traditional culture (the Constitution) and moral values (religion) through its various social movements. Communist systems attack a handful of traditional beliefs or moral concepts at a time, and through manufactured chaos and social instability, it aims to destroy the institutions that once existed so that it can re-create society according to what it wants.The differences between Progressives and Conservative Americans could not be starker: 

 

• Conservative Americans believe in self-rule by the people, in freedom, and equal justice under the law.
• Progressives believe in rule by the few - social justice that favors certain political factions over others.
  
  
• Conservative Americans believe in the Rule of Law
• Progressives believe in the Rule of Will.

• Conservative Americans believe that all men are created equal before God and the Law.
• Progressives believe that some men are more equal than others.

• Conservative Americans believe that taxes are only intended to pay for those services that every citizen requires to secure their safety and liberty from threats to both, like courthouses and armies.
• Progressives believe that taxes should be used to share success and “redistribute wealth” to provide for dole programs and subsidies for those who don't contribute. 
   
• Conservative Americans revere the principles outlined in the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the Federalist Papers. The Constitution as the greatest set of principals ever assembled by humanity.
• Progressives see such principles as antiquated and obsolete made up by rich white, slave owners and therefore they and it are tarnished and irrelevant which need to change.

      Why now is free market capitalism disfavored and threatened by many on the left? It is not because of its failure, but because of its success. Free market capitalism in America has been so successful in eliminating the traditional problems of mankind – such as disease, pestilence, hunger, and gross poverty -- that all other human problems appear both unbearable and inexcusable. The desire by many privileged Americans to eliminate these so-called unbearable and inexcusable problems has led to the call for Socialism. But as Dr. Thomas Sowell has said, "Socialism sounds great. It has always sounded great. And it will probably always continue to sound great. It is only when you go beyond rhetoric, and start looking at hard facts, that Socialism turns out to be a big disappointment, if not a disaster."

Voter Fraud is Real and It's Bad.

By

       George Sontag

      The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of voter ID in a 6-3 decision in 2008. Since that time, 34 states have adopted some form of ID laws, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. Other states, mostly controlled by the Democratic party have fought the decision. This movement is funded, in part, by the Center for Voting and Democracy, a George Soros-funded election group.

      The Democratic party constantly insists that voter fraud is almost non-existent. So why, in 2012, did Pew researchers reported that more than 24 million voter registrations were inaccurate, outdated or duplicates, that nearly 2 million dead people were on the rolls, and that nearly three million people were registered in more than one state?

Time to stop the lies and look at the facts – the real facts.

• There have been more than 1,000 convictions for voter fraud since 2000.
• 8,400 instances of double voting in the 2016 election in 20 states.
• In Los Angeles County, there are 144 registered voters for every 100 citizens of voting age, according to a Judicial Watch report from 2017.
• State elections officials in North Carolina are investigating hundreds of cases of potential voter fraud after identifying thousands of registered voters with personal information matching those of voters who voted in other states in 2012.
  
• Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch said by his calculation, around 1.1 million non-citizens voted illegally in the 2016 presidential election.
  “And of course every one of those illegal votes is a stolen vote of an honest American,” he said. “They vote in substantially large numbers, and anyone that tells you otherwise is blowing smoke in your ear.
  

Here are some stories that were buried in the US media.

Scores Of Registered Voters Over 116 Years Old Found In Ohio’s 12th District That Just Had Tight Special Election

      Eric Eggers, the research director at the Government Accountability Institute (GAI), reports that GAI accessed voter rolls in Ohio’s 12th Congressional District last August and found "170 registered voters listed as being over 116 years old [that] still existed on the [voter] rolls." Eggers notes that leftist billionaire and Democratic mega-donor George Soros pledged millions of dollars to fight against voter ID laws in Ohio before the 2016 elections.

Twice As Many Ballots Cast As There Are Voters In Georgia Precinct

     Democratic voters came back to life. Questions of electronic malfunction, outside tampering, and voter fraud — particularly in light of a pending investigation into alleged voter fraud during the Atlanta mayoral election runoff last December — linger over the state.

23,000+ Voters Incorrectly Registered by California DMV

      Officials are rushing to correct mistakes as the California DMV incorrectly registers more than 23,000 voters. The errors reveal serious flaws in California’s voting system.

Illinois Democrat Party Leader Tells Voters: “Vote Early, Vote Often. Whatever You Can Get Away With”

https://youtu.be/MUncFEbvbkQ

California's DMV finds 1,500 more people possibly wrongly registered to vote: report

      “California statewide is a mess,” said Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch. “Generally speaking, California doesn’t remove you from their voter rolls, despite you never voting, despite you dying—it looks like—they just don’t do it. What a recipe for fraud.”

THEY EVEN TRY TO CHEAT EACH OTHER

Texas Democrat Runoff Election Results Invalidated for ‘Voter Fraud’

     No Republican candidate ran on the other side of this race. The winner of the Democrat do-over primary election will run unopposed for the Precinct 4 in November.

AND: JUST YESTERDAY

Four Democrats Arrested For Running ‘Voter Fraud Ring’ - Targeted Seniors In Fort Worth 10/14/2018

       Members of an organized voter fraud ring have been arrested and indicted on charges they targeted and, in one case stole, the votes of elderly voters.
Four people (Democrats) were arrested — Leticia Sanchez, Leticia Sanchez Tepichin, Maria Solis and Laura Parra — after being indicted on 30 felony counts of voter fraud, according to a statement from the Texas Attorney General’s Office.
These people allegedly were paid to target older voters on the north side “in a scheme to generate a large number of mail ballots and then harvest those ballots for specific candidates in 2016. The harvesters sit around and fill these out by the hundreds, often by the thousands,” the statement read.

FINALLY DOING SOMETHING?

US House Approves Measure Against Non-Citizen Voting

      65 percent of House says only citizens should be allowed to vote in US elections.

BUT WILL IT MATTER?

Nation's Top Voting Machine Vendor Admits It Installed Remote-Access Software...

MOTHERBOARD reports:
      The nation's top voting machine maker has admitted in a letter to a federal lawmaker that the company installed remote-access software on election-management systems it sold over a period of six years, AND LIED ABOUT IT, raising questions about the security of those systems and the integrity of elections that were conducted with them.

      It’s not as if the Right Wing was engaged in voter fraud. in Philedelphia during the last election. . . Democrats won 100 percent of the vote in multiple districts. “That is outrageous. That is criminal. That is wrong, and it shouldn’t be allowed to go any further without substantial investigations from our local district attorneys who are the ones charged with enforcing these laws. We have the 'Walking Dead,' and now we've got the 'Voting Dead. "I guess the reason there's no proof of voter fraud is because we weren't looking for it," said Sen. Bob Rucho. That and we are constantly being told that it doesn't exist.

*For more, see the American Civil Rights Union’s paper, The Truth about Voter ID.