by
George Sontag
Here are just a couple of facts about immigration and immigrants in this country:
- Most
of the crimes in Texas, California, and Arizona are federal crimes,
connected to illegal aliens.
- 27
percent of all Californians were not born in the United
States. More than 40 million foreign-born immigrants currently reside
in the U.S. -- the highest number in the nation's history.
- The
Social Security Administration has told Congress that more than half
a million illegal immigrants have received new Social Security
numbers, under President Barack Obama’s 2012 executive action
allowing younger immigrants to stay in the United States and
work. Low-income
immigrants with no net tax liability could gain as much as $3 in
Social Security benefits for every $1 they pay into the system, which
means Americans will now be subsidizing these immigrants.
Our
founders, asserted their concerns publicly and routinely about the
effects of indiscriminate mass immigration. They made it clear that
the purpose of allowing foreigners into our fledgling nation was not, as it is today,
to recruit millions of new voters or to secure permanent ruling
majorities for their political parties. It was to preserve, protect
and enhance the republic they put their lives on the line to
establish.
In
a 1790 House debate on naturalization, James Madison opined: "It
is no doubt very
desirable that we should hold out as many inducements as possible for
the worthy
part of mankind to come and settle amongst us, and throw their
fortunes into
a common lot with ours. But why is this desirable? It is to increase the wealth and strength of the
community; and those
who acquire the rights of citizenship, without adding to the strength
or
wealth
of the community are not the people we are in want of."
This is a far cry from the rhetoric heard today from the left. Madison
argued plainly that America should welcome the immigrant who could assimilate,
but exclude the immigrant who could not readily "incorporate
himself into
our society." It was not because "diversity" is our greatest value, not
because big business needed
cheap labor, as Madison asserted, "Not merely to swell the
catalogue of
people."
George
Washington concurred in a letter to John Adams, similarly emphasized that immigrants
should be absorbed into American life so that "by an
intermixture
with
our people, they, or their descendants, get assimilated to our
customs, measures,
laws: in a word soon become one people." That is as relevant as ever today because that is not happening. We are allowing cultures and groups to keep their own beliefs and customs, some which are repugnant and contrary to what is American. This is causing civil unrest within the country.
Alexander
Hamilton, wrote in 1802: "The safety of
a republic
depends essentially on the energy of a common national sentiment; on
a uniformity
of principles and habits; on the exemption of the citizens from
foreign bias
and prejudice; and on that love of country which will almost
invariably be found
to be closely connected with birth, education and family." Hamilton
further warned that "The United States have already felt the
evils of incorporating
a large number of foreigners into their national mass; by promoting in
different classes different predilections in favor of particular
foreign nations, and
antipathies against others, it has served very much to divide the
community and
to distract our councils. It has been often likely to compromise the
interests of our
own country in favor of another." These words clearly were very much against what is now called 'globalism."
He
predicted, correctly, that "The permanent effect of such a
policy will be, that in times
of great public danger there will be always a numerous body of men,
of whom
there may be just grounds of distrust; the suspicion alone will
weaken the strength
of the nation, but their force may be actually employed in assisting
an invader."
The
survival of the American Republic, Hamilton maintained, depends upon
"the preservation
of a national spirit and a national character." He asserted, "To
admit foreigners
indiscriminately to the rights of citizens the moment they put foot
in our
country would be nothing less than to admit the Trojan horse into
the citadel of
our liberty and sovereignty. While
billions of immigrants may benefit by moving to this country,
this nation state has only one responsibility. We must decide if such
an admission
complies with our law and serves our national interest."
No comments:
Post a Comment