The Supreme Court Had No Choice

 by

       M. Richard Maxson

      As we at the American Constitutionalist expected, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear the claims of the states that the election of 2020 was fraudulent. It was expected because there is no clear cut clause in the Constitution to deal with massive vote fraud. The four states in a filing asked the justices to reject the lawsuit, which they said had no legal grounds. The Supreme Court agreed. The Court, if it took it up, would have to set new precedent outside of the Constitution and since it is the job of Congress to make law, NOT the court, it was denied.

      It was expected because the Constitution expected it’s citizens to be honest and honorable in making such an important choice. They never foresaw a situation of massive fraud, an organized effort from within the country by a political party, paid for with millions of dollars from foreign entities and anti-American values millionaire and billionaire Socialists within.

      So on Friday, the highest court in the land decided that Texas “lacked standing” to challenge the conduct of elections in Georgia, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin under Article 3 of the US Constitution. "Texas has not demonstrated a judicially cognisable interest in the manner in which another state conducts its elections," the court said in its ruling.

      Alan West of Texas remarked, “The Supreme Court, in tossing the Texas lawsuit that was joined by seventeen (21 at last count) states and 106 US congressman,(over 120 at last count) decreed that a state can take unconstitutional actions and violate its own election law -- resulting in damaging effects on other states that abide by the law, while the guilty state suffers no consequences,” West wrote, “This decision establishes a precedent that says states can violate the U.S. Constitution and not be held accountable,” West continued. “This decision will have far-reaching ramifications for the future of our Constitutional Republic.

                             What is the constitutional point that is in discussion?

Article III, Section 2 - Signed in convention September 17, 1787. Ratified June 21, 1788.

       “The judicial Power shall extend to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority;--to all Cases affecting Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls;--to all Cases of admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction;--to Controversies to which the United States shall be a Party;--to Controversies between two or more States;--between a State and Citizens of another State;--between Citizens of different States;--between Citizens of the same State claiming Lands under Grants of different States, and between a State, or the Citizens thereof, and foreign States, Citizens or Subjects.”

      Article III, Section 2 creates a series of categories of “cases” or “controversies” to which the judicial power “shall extend.” Examples include “all Cases, in Law and Equity,” arising under the Constitution, cases “of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction,” and controversies in which the parties come from different states (“diversity jurisdiction”).

      However, a portion of Article III, Section 2, was changed by the 11th Amendment. The Eleventh Amendment’s text prohibits the federal courts from hearing certain lawsuits against states. “The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.” Yet the article in question explicitly states that the SCOTUS will be the original jurisdiction in “Controversies between two or more States; – between a State and Citizens of another State; – between Citizens of different States,” among other things.

      The conflict of the Amendment and the wildly different voter laws in the individual states have given rise to enforcing another part of the Constitution, the selection of the electors to the electoral collage. As of this writing, eighteen states and more than 100 Republicans in Congress endorsed discarding the results of the election and putting the White House in the hands of state legislatures.

      The global Socialist elite have made a Biden-Harris administration, now but inevitable. He and his followers have said they want to cancel Jefferson and Washington among other Founders as a racist and “change” America in the name of “equity.” Part of that agenda is abolishing the Senate filibuster and “packing” the Supreme Court by appointing additional justices, to cancel the supposed conservative majority. This Socialist coup is something Constitutional Americans - and the history books - won't soon forget.